» Articles » PMID: 31549521

Harsh Communication: Characteristics of Caregivers and Persons with Dementia

Overview
Publisher Routledge
Specialty Geriatrics
Date 2019 Sep 25
PMID 31549521
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

While ways to reduce caregiver burden have dominated dementia care research, there is little understanding of daily communication and its relationship to caregiver burden and depression. In this study, we sought to: (1) describe the frequency of harsh communication used by caregivers; (2) examine the relationship between harsh communication, caregiver and person with dementia characteristics; and (3) determine the contributions of caregiver depression and burden on such communication. Cross-sectional baseline data were drawn from 250 dyads, who participated in the Dementia Behavior Study (NCT01892579). Hierarchical linear regression models were used to examine the relationship between dyad characteristics and harsh communication scores (using the 6-item Negative Communication Scale), controlling for three groups of covariates: sociodemographic, relationship characteristics and health factors. More than half of the caregivers (mean age = 65.4, 81.2% women, 45.6% spouses) reported they felt like screaming/yelling ( = 138, 55.2%) or used a harsh tone ( = 129, 51.6%) at persons with dementia (Mini Mental Status Examination mean = 14.3, SD: 7.8) at least sometimes. When controlling for all covariates, for each unit increase in caregiver burden, harsh communication increased by 0.486 units ( < 0.001); similarly, for each unit increase in caregiver depression, harsh communication increased by 0.301units ( < 0.001). Over half of dementia caregivers reported they felt like or used one or more harsh forms of communication. Caregiver burden and depression were incrementally associated with greater use of negative communication. Providing caregivers with knowledge, support and specific communication skills may lessen the frequency of harsh communication and possibly reduce burden and depression.

Citing Articles

Sleep quality differences among caregivers for persons living with and without dementia.

Petrovsky D, Geisser S, Kolte S, Luth E Aging Ment Health. 2024; 28(12):1760-1766.

PMID: 38818868 PMC: 11560601. DOI: 10.1080/13607863.2024.2354888.


Shared Activities as a Protective Factor Against Behavioral and Psychological Symptoms of Dementia and Caregiver Stress.

Petrovsky D, Yildiz M, Yefimova M, Sefcik J, Baker Z, Ma K Innov Aging. 2024; 8(5):igae034.

PMID: 38660116 PMC: 11037273. DOI: 10.1093/geroni/igae034.


Communication Patterns and Characteristics of Family Caregivers and Persons Living With Dementia: Secondary Analysis of Video Observation.

Kim S, Liu W, Daack-Hirsch S, Williams K West J Nurs Res. 2024; 46(4):264-277.

PMID: 38400741 PMC: 10955794. DOI: 10.1177/01939459241233360.

References
1.
Gitlin L, Roth D, Burgio L, Loewenstein D, Winter L, Nichols L . Caregiver appraisals of functional dependence in individuals with dementia and associated caregiver upset: psychometric properties of a new scale and response patterns by caregiver and care recipient characteristics. J Aging Health. 2005; 17(2):148-71. PMC: 2579270. DOI: 10.1177/0898264304274184. View

2.
Folstein M, Folstein S, McHugh P . "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975; 12(3):189-98. DOI: 10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6. View

3.
Savundranayagam M, Hummert M, Montgomery R . Investigating the effects of communication problems on caregiver burden. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2005; 60(1):S48-55. DOI: 10.1093/geronb/60.1.s48. View

4.
Cooper C, Manela M, Katona C, Livingston G . Screening for elder abuse in dementia in the LASER-AD study: prevalence, correlates and validation of instruments. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2007; 23(3):283-8. DOI: 10.1002/gps.1875. View

5.
Fortinsky R, Gitlin L, Pizzi L, Piersol C, Grady J, Robison J . Translation of the Care of Persons with Dementia in their Environments (COPE) intervention in a publicly-funded home care context: Rationale and research design. Contemp Clin Trials. 2016; 49:155-65. PMC: 4979745. DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2016.07.006. View