A Characterization of Personal Care Product Use Among Undergraduate Female College Students in South Carolina, USA

Overview

Journal J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol

Specialties Environmental Health
Public Health

Date 2019 Sep 25

PMID 31548624

Citations 9

Authors

Leslie B Hart

Joanna Walker

Barbara Beckingham

Ally Shelley

Moriah Alten Flagg

Kerry Wischusen

Beth Sundstrom

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Some chemicals used in personal care products (PCPs) are associated with endocrine disruption, developmental abnormalities, and reproductive impairment. Previous studies have evaluated product use among various populations; however, information on college women, a population with a unique lifestyle, is scarce. The proportion and frequency of product use were measured using a self-administered survey among 138 female undergraduates. Respondents were predominately Caucasian (80.4%, reflecting the college's student body), and represented all years of study (freshman: 24.6%; sophomore: 30.4%; junior: 18.8%; senior: 26.1%). All respondents reported use of at least two PCPs within 24 h prior to sampling (maximum = 17; median = 8; IQR = 6-11). Compared with studies of pregnant and postpartum women, adult men, and Latina adolescents, college women surveyed reported significantly higher use of deodorant, conditioner, perfume, liquid soap, hand/body lotion, sunscreen, nail polish, eyeshadow, and lip balm (Chi Square, p < 0.05). More study is needed to understand the magnitude and racial disparities of PCP chemical exposure, but given the potential effects on reproduction and fertility, our findings of abundant and frequent product use among these reproductive-aged women highlight opportunities for intervention and information on endocrine disrupting chemical (EDC)-free alternative products and behaviors.

Citing Articles

Evaluating personal care product use by Environmental Working Group hazard scores in relation to consumers' sociodemographic characteristics, purchasing behaviors, and product safety perceptions.

Barrett E, Wadie K, Getz K, Greenberg P, Moore T, Llanos A J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2025; .

PMID: 39979547 DOI: 10.1038/s41370-025-00751-9.

Impact of Skin Care Products on Phthalates and Phthalate Replacements in Children: the ECHO-FGS.

Bloom M, Clark J, Pearce J, Ferguson P, Newman R, Roberts J Environ Health Perspect. 2024; 132(9):97001.

PMID: 39230332 PMC: 11373421. DOI: 10.1289/EHP13937.

Silicone wristbands reveal ubiquitous human exposure to ortho-phthalates and non-ortho-phthalate plasticizers in Southern California.

Reddam A, Herkert N, Stapleton H, Volz D Environ Res. 2024; 258:119465.

PMID: 38908658 PMC: 11323145. DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2024.119465.

Risk perception and use of personal care products by race and ethnicity among a diverse population.

Mandeville J, Alkhalaf Z, Joannidis C, Ryan M, Nelson D, Quiros-Alcala L UCL Open Environ. 2024; 6:e3038.

PMID: 38757092 PMC: 11098005. DOI: 10.14324/111.444/ucloe.3038.

Evaluating Neighborhood-Level Differences in Hair Product Safety by Environmental Working Group Ratings among Retailers in Boston, Massachusetts.

Chan M, Parikh S, Shyr D, Shamasunder B, Adamkiewicz G, James-Todd T Environ Health Perspect. 2023; 131(9):97002.

PMID: 37702490 PMC: 10498863. DOI: 10.1289/EHP10653.

References

De Coster S, van Larebeke N . Endocrine-disrupting chemicals: associated disorders and mechanisms of action. J Environ Public Health. 2012; 2012:713696. PMC: 3443608. DOI: 10.1155/2012/713696. View

Darbre P, Aljarrah A, Miller W, Coldham N, Sauer M, Pope G . Concentrations of parabens in human breast tumours. J Appl Toxicol. 2004; 24(1):5-13. DOI: 10.1002/jat.958. View

Rachon D . Endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs) and female cancer: Informing the patients. Rev Endocr Metab Disord. 2016; 16(4):359-64. PMC: 4801991. DOI: 10.1007/s11154-016-9332-9. View

Dodson R, Nishioka M, Standley L, Perovich L, Brody J, Rudel R . Endocrine disruptors and asthma-associated chemicals in consumer products. Environ Health Perspect. 2012; 120(7):935-43. PMC: 3404651. DOI: 10.1289/ehp.1104052. View

Koniecki D, Wang R, Moody R, Zhu J . Phthalates in cosmetic and personal care products: concentrations and possible dermal exposure. Environ Res. 2011; 111(3):329-36. DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2011.01.013. View

Guo Y, Kannan K . A survey of phthalates and parabens in personal care products from the United States and its implications for human exposure. Environ Sci Technol. 2013; 47(24):14442-9. DOI: 10.1021/es4042034. View

Liao C, Kannan K . Widespread occurrence of benzophenone-type UV light filters in personal care products from China and the United States: an assessment of human exposure. Environ Sci Technol. 2014; 48(7):4103-9. DOI: 10.1021/es405450n. View

Braun J, Just A, Williams P, Smith K, Calafat A, Hauser R . Personal care product use and urinary phthalate metabolite and paraben concentrations during pregnancy among women from a fertility clinic. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2013; 24(5):459-66. PMC: 4016195. DOI: 10.1038/jes.2013.69. View

Parlett L, Calafat A, Swan S . Women's exposure to phthalates in relation to use of personal care products. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2012; 23(2):197-206. PMC: 4097177. DOI: 10.1038/jes.2012.105. View

10.

Wu X, Bennett D, Ritz B, Cassady D, Lee K, Hertz-Picciotto I . Usage pattern of personal care products in California households. Food Chem Toxicol. 2010; 48(11):3109-19. DOI: 10.1016/j.fct.2010.08.004. View

11.

Manova E, von Goetz N, Keller C, Siegrist M, Hungerbuhler K . Use patterns of leave-on personal care products among Swiss-German children, adolescents, and adults. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2013; 10(7):2778-98. PMC: 3734457. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph10072778. View

12.

Biesterbos J, Dudzina T, Delmaar C, Bakker M, Russel F, von Goetz N . Usage patterns of personal care products: important factors for exposure assessment. Food Chem Toxicol. 2012; 55:8-17. DOI: 10.1016/j.fct.2012.11.014. View

13.

Pelletier J, Laska M . Balancing healthy meals and busy lives: associations between work, school, and family responsibilities and perceived time constraints among young adults. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2012; 44(6):481-9. PMC: 3496024. DOI: 10.1016/j.jneb.2012.04.001. View

14.

Deliens T, Clarys P, De Bourdeaudhuij I, Deforche B . Determinants of eating behaviour in university students: a qualitative study using focus group discussions. BMC Public Health. 2014; 14:53. PMC: 3905922. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-53. View

15.

Chan L, Chalupka S, Barrett R . Female college student awareness of exposures to environmental toxins in personal care products and their effect on preconception health. Workplace Health Saf. 2015; 63(2):64-70. DOI: 10.1177/2165079914565347. View

16.

Nassan F, Coull B, Gaskins A, Williams M, Skakkebaek N, Ford J . Personal Care Product Use in Men and Urinary Concentrations of Select Phthalate Metabolites and Parabens: Results from the Environment And Reproductive Health (EARTH) Study. Environ Health Perspect. 2017; 125(8):087012. PMC: 5783668. DOI: 10.1289/EHP1374. View

17.

Li S, Lozano P, C Grossman D, Graham E . Hormone-containing hair product use in prepubertal children. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2002; 156(1):85-6. DOI: 10.1001/archpedi.156.1.85. View

18.

Philippat C, Bennett D, Calafat A, Picciotto I . Exposure to select phthalates and phenols through use of personal care products among Californian adults and their children. Environ Res. 2015; 140:369-76. PMC: 4724203. DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2015.04.009. View

19.

Bell F . Effects of phthalate esters on lipid metabolism in various tissues, cells and organelles in mammals. Environ Health Perspect. 1982; 45:41-50. PMC: 1568983. DOI: 10.1289/ehp.824541. View

20.

Mathieu-Denoncourt J, Wallace S, de Solla S, Langlois V . Plasticizer endocrine disruption: Highlighting developmental and reproductive effects in mammals and non-mammalian aquatic species. Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2014; 219:74-88. DOI: 10.1016/j.ygcen.2014.11.003. View