» Articles » PMID: 31544628

Cervical Cord Neurodegeneration in Traumatic and Non-Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury

Overview
Journal J Neurotrauma
Publisher Mary Ann Liebert
Date 2019 Sep 24
PMID 31544628
Citations 26
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This study aimed to compare macrostructural and microstructural neurodegenerative changes remote from a cervical spinal cord injury in traumatic spinal cord injury (tSCI) and degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) patients using quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Twenty-nine tSCI patients, 20 mild/moderate DCM patients, and 22 healthy controls underwent a high-resolution MRI protocol at the cervical cord (C2/C3). High-resolution T2*-weighted and diffusion-weighted scans provided data to calculate tissue-specific cross-sectional areas of the spinal cord and tract-specific diffusion indices of cord white matter, respectively. Regression analysis determined associations between neurodegeneration and clinical impairment. tSCI patients showed more impairment in upper limb strength and manual dexterity when compared with DCM patients. While macrostructural MRI measures revealed a similar extent of remote cord atrophy at cervical level, microstructural measures (diffusion indices) were able to distinguish more pronounced tract-specific neurodegeneration in tSCI patients when compared with DCM patients. Tract-specific neurodegeneration was associated with upper limb impairment. Despite clinical differences between severely impaired tSCI compared with mildly affected DCM patient, extensive cord atrophy is present remotely from the focal spinal cord injury. Diffusion indices revealed greater tract-specific alterations in tSCI patients. Therefore, diffusion indices are more sensitive than macrostructural MRI measures as these are able to distinguish between traumatic and non-traumatic spinal cord injury. Neuroimaging biomarkers of cervical cord integrity hold potential as predictors of recovery and might be suitable biomarkers for interventional trials both in traumatic and non-traumatic SCI.

Citing Articles

Evaluation of magnetic resonance spectroscopy total sodium concentration measures, and associations with microstructure and physical impairment in cervical myelopathy.

Solanky B, Prados F, Tur C, Grussu F, Al-Ahmad S, Yang X Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):7014.

PMID: 40016502 PMC: 11868613. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-91658-w.


Harmonization of Longitudinal Diffusion Tensor Imaging Data of the Pediatric Cervical and Thoracic Spinal Cord at 3T Using Longitudinal ComBat.

Li Y, Middleton D, Chen A, Shinohara R, Krisa L, Faro S Res Sq. 2024; .

PMID: 39011114 PMC: 11247925. DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-4536023/v1.


Potential thresholds of critically increased cardiac-related spinal cord motion in degenerative cervical myelopathy.

Pfender N, Jutzeler C, Hubli M, Scheuren P, Pfyffer D, Zipser C Front Neurol. 2024; 15:1411182.

PMID: 38978814 PMC: 11228334. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1411182.


Quantifying neurodegeneration of the cervical cord and brain in degenerative cervical myelopathy: A multicentre study using quantitative magnetic resonance imaging.

Freund P, Boller V, Emmenegger T, Akbar M, Hupp M, Pfender N Eur J Neurol. 2024; 31(7):e16297.

PMID: 38713645 PMC: 11235710. DOI: 10.1111/ene.16297.


Biomedical applications of stimuli-responsive "smart" interpenetrating polymer network hydrogels.

Wu J, Xue W, Yun Z, Liu Q, Sun X Mater Today Bio. 2024; 25:100998.

PMID: 38390342 PMC: 10882133. DOI: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2024.100998.


References
1.
Fehlings M, Skaf G . A review of the pathophysiology of cervical spondylotic myelopathy with insights for potential novel mechanisms drawn from traumatic spinal cord injury. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1999; 23(24):2730-7. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199812150-00012. View

2.
Kalsi-Ryan S, Curt A, Verrier M, Fehlings M . Development of the Graded Redefined Assessment of Strength, Sensibility and Prehension (GRASSP): reviewing measurement specific to the upper limb in tetraplegia. J Neurosurg Spine. 2012; 17(1 Suppl):65-76. DOI: 10.3171/2012.6.AOSPINE1258. View

3.
Ones K, Yilmaz E, Beydogan A, Gultekin O, Caglar N . Comparison of functional results in non-traumatic and traumatic spinal cord injury. Disabil Rehabil. 2007; 29(15):1185-91. DOI: 10.1080/09638280600902661. View

4.
Grabher P, Mohammadi S, Trachsler A, Friedl S, David G, Sutter R . Voxel-based analysis of grey and white matter degeneration in cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Sci Rep. 2016; 6:24636. PMC: 4837346. DOI: 10.1038/srep24636. View

5.
Karadimas S, Gatzounis G, Fehlings M . Pathobiology of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Eur Spine J. 2014; 24 Suppl 2:132-8. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-014-3264-4. View