» Articles » PMID: 31543319

A Growth Model of Neuroendocrine Tumor Surrogates and the Efficacy of a Novel Somatostatin-receptor-guided Antibody-drug Conjugate: Perspectives on Clinical Response?

Overview
Journal Surgery
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2019 Sep 24
PMID 31543319
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: As patient-derived xenografts and other preclinical models of neuroendocrine tumors for testing personalized therapeutics are lacking, we have developed a perfused, 3D bioreactor model to culture tumor surrogates from patient-derived neuroendocrine tumors. This work evaluates the duration of surrogate culture and surrogate response to a novel antibody-drug conjugate.

Methods: Twenty-seven patient-derived neuroendocrine tumors were cultured. Histologic sections of a pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor xenograft (BON-1) tumor were assessed for SSTR2 expression before tumor implantation into 2 bioreactors. One surrogate was treated with an antibody-drug conjugate composed of an anti-mitotic Monomethyl auristatin-E linked to a somatostatin receptor 2 antibody. Viability and therapeutic response were assessed by pre-imaging incubation with IR-783 and the RealTime-Glo AnnexinV Apoptosis and Necrosis Assay (Promega Corporation, Madison, WI) over 6 days. A primary human pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor was evaluated similarly.

Results: Mean surrogate growth duration was 34.8 days. Treated BON-1 surrogates exhibited less proliferation (1.2 vs 1.9-fold) and greater apoptosis (1.5 vs 1.1-fold) than controls, whereas treated patient-derived neuroendocrine tumor bioreactors exhibited greater degrees of apoptosis (13- vs 9-fold) and necrosis (2.5- vs 1.6-fold).

Conclusion: Patient-derived neuroendocrine tumor surrogates can be cultured reliably within the bioreactor. This model can be used to evaluate the efficacy of antibody-guided chemotherapy ex vivo and may be useful for predicting clinical responses.

Citing Articles

Models in Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: Current Perspectives and Future Directions.

Forsythe S, Pu T, Andrews S, Madigan J, Sadowski S Cancers (Basel). 2023; 15(15).

PMID: 37568572 PMC: 10416968. DOI: 10.3390/cancers15153756.


A hitchhiker's guide to cancer models.

Budhwani K, Patel Z, Guenter R, Charania A Trends Biotechnol. 2022; 40(11):1361-1373.

PMID: 35534320 PMC: 9588514. DOI: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2022.04.003.


Modeling of Human Neuroendocrine Tumors in Tissue Surrogates.

Herring B, Jang S, Whitt J, Goliwas K, Aburjania Z, Dudeja V Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022; 12:710009.

PMID: 35002949 PMC: 8734644. DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2021.710009.

References
1.
Foster D, Jensen R, Norton J . Management of Liver Neuroendocrine Tumors in 2018. JAMA Oncol. 2018; 4(11):1605-1606. DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.3035. View

2.
Kawasaki K, Fujii M, Sato T . Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: genes, therapies and models. Dis Model Mech. 2018; 11(2). PMC: 5894937. DOI: 10.1242/dmm.029595. View

3.
Vandamme T, Beyens M, Peeters M, Van Camp G, Op de Beeck K . Next generation exome sequencing of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor cell lines BON-1 and QGP-1 reveals different lineages. Cancer Genet. 2015; 208(10):523. DOI: 10.1016/j.cancergen.2015.07.003. View

4.
Strosberg J, El-Haddad G, Wolin E, Hendifar A, Yao J, Chasen B . Phase 3 Trial of Lu-Dotatate for Midgut Neuroendocrine Tumors. N Engl J Med. 2017; 376(2):125-135. PMC: 5895095. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1607427. View

5.
Lee L, Ito T, Jensen R . Everolimus in the treatment of neuroendocrine tumors: efficacy, side-effects, resistance, and factors affecting its place in the treatment sequence. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2018; 19(8):909-928. PMC: 6064188. DOI: 10.1080/14656566.2018.1476492. View