» Articles » PMID: 31540831

Development and Acceptability Testing of a Patient Decision Aid for Individuals with Localized Renal Masses Considering Surgical Removal with Partial or Radical Nephrectomy

Overview
Journal Urol Oncol
Publisher Elsevier
Date 2019 Sep 22
PMID 31540831
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Patient decision aids are structured clinical tools that facilitate shared decision-making. In urology, the decision between partial and radical nephrectomy for a renal mass can be difficult. We sought to develop and evaluate a decision aid for patients with a localized renal mass considering surgery. This paper describes the development process and acceptability testing of our patient decision aid.

Material And Methods: A decision aid was systematically created using the International Patient Decision Aids Standards. Review of the literature identified evidence regarding patient-important outcomes of partial and radical nephrectomy. A mixed methods survey was designed to assess acceptability of the decision aid. Kidney cancer survivors, patient advocates, methodological experts, and urologists were recruited to evaluate the decision aid. The primary outcome was the acceptability of the decision aid reported by survey responders.

Results: An evidence-based decision aid was created. Included benefits were overall survival, cancer-free survival, and length of hospital stay. Included harms were postoperative bleeding, urine leak, stage 3 renal failure, renal replacement therapy, and flank bulge. The decision aid met the International Patient Decision Aids Standards defining (6 of 6), certification (6 of 6), and quality criteria (21 of 23). Results of acceptability testing were highly favorable. Responders (n = 22) reported the decision aid had acceptable language (91%), an appropriate length (82%), and presented balanced options (91%). Nine of 11 urologists (82%) reported intended use with future patients.

Conclusions: A novel, evidence-based decision aid was created for patients with renal masses considering surgery. The decision aid is available at https://decisionaid.ohri.ca/AZsumm.php?ID=1913. A separate decision aid addressing the management of small renal masses is currently under development.

Citing Articles

Decision aid development and its acceptability among adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorders regarding treatment discontinuation after remission.

Tsujii N, Okada T, Usami M, Kuwabara H, Fujita J, Negoro H PCN Rep. 2024; 1(4):e57.

PMID: 38868662 PMC: 11114424. DOI: 10.1002/pcn5.57.


Asking those who know their needs best: A framework for active engagement and involvement of childhood cancer survivors and parents in the process of psychosocial research-A workshop report.

Weiler-Wichtl L, Schneider C, Gsell H, Maletzky A, Kienesberger A, Rohl C Cancer Rep (Hoboken). 2024; 7(5):e2071.

PMID: 38767531 PMC: 11104286. DOI: 10.1002/cnr2.2071.


Clinical Decision Support for Surgery: A Mixed Methods Study on Design and Implementation Perspectives From Urologists.

Tan H, Spratte B, Deal A, Heiling H, Nazzal E, Meeks W Urology. 2024; 190:15-23.

PMID: 38697362 PMC: 11344670. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2024.04.033.


The Development and Testing of a Patient Decision Aid for Individuals with Homologous Recombinant Proficient Ovarian Cancer Who Are Considering Niraparib Maintenance Therapy.

Hopkins L, Carey M, Brown L, McCrea S, Milne M, Tokaryk D Curr Oncol. 2024; 31(3):1416-1425.

PMID: 38534940 PMC: 10969309. DOI: 10.3390/curroncol31030107.


Development and acceptability testing of a decision aid for considering whether to reduce antipsychotics in individuals with stable schizophrenia.

Aoki Y, Takaesu Y, Matsui K, Tokumasu T, Tani H, Takekita Y Neuropsychopharmacol Rep. 2023; 43(3):391-402.

PMID: 37452456 PMC: 10496039. DOI: 10.1002/npr2.12366.