» Articles » PMID: 31536571

Detailed Global Modelling of Soil Organic Carbon in Cropland, Grassland and Forest Soils

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2019 Sep 20
PMID 31536571
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Assessments of the global carbon (C) cycle typically rely on simplified models which consider large areas as homogeneous in terms of the response of soils to land use or consider very broad land classes. For example, "cropland" is typically modelled as an aggregation of distinct practices and individual crops over large regions. Here, we use the process-based Rothamsted soil Carbon Model (RothC model), which has a history of being successfully applied at a global scale, to calculate attainable SOC stocks and C mineralization rates for each of c. 17,000 regions (combination of soil type and texture, climate type, initial land use and country) in the World, under near-past climate conditions. We considered 28 individual crops and, for each, multiple production practices, plus 16 forest types and 1 grassland class (total of 80 classes). We find that conversion to cropland can result in SOC increases, particularly when the soil remains covered with crop residues (an average gain of 12 t C/ha) or using irrigation (4 t C/ha), which are mutually reinforcing effects. Attainable SOC stocks vary significantly depending on the land use class, particularly for cropland. Common aggregations in global modelling of a single agricultural class would be inaccurate representations of these results. Attainable SOC stocks obtained here were compared to long-term experiment data and are well aligned with the literature. Our results provide a regional and detailed understanding of C sequestration that will also enable better greenhouse gas reporting at national level as alternatives to IPCC tier 2 defaults.

Citing Articles

Temporal adjustment approach for high-resolution continental scale modeling of soil organic carbon.

Bokati L, Somenahally A, Kumar S, Robatjazi J, Talchabadel R, Sarkar R Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):6483.

PMID: 39987305 PMC: 11846914. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-89503-1.


A global dataset for the production and usage of cereal residues in the period 1997-2021.

Smerald A, Rahimi J, Scheer C Sci Data. 2023; 10(1):685.

PMID: 37813901 PMC: 10562449. DOI: 10.1038/s41597-023-02587-0.


Climate-smart forestry through innovative wood products and commercial afforestation and reforestation on marginal land.

Zhang B, Lan K, Harris T, Ashton M, Yao Y Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023; 120(23):e2221840120.

PMID: 37252998 PMC: 10265990. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2221840120.


A generalizable framework for spatially explicit exploration of soil organic carbon sequestration on global marginal land.

Albers A, Avadi A, Hamelin L Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1):11144.

PMID: 35778406 PMC: 9249906. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-14759-w.


Global process-based characterization factors of soil carbon depletion for life cycle impact assessment.

Teixeira R, Morais T, Domingos T Sci Data. 2021; 8(1):237.

PMID: 34504111 PMC: 8429584. DOI: 10.1038/s41597-021-01018-2.


References
1.
Harris N, Brown S, Hagen S, Saatchi S, Petrova S, Salas W . Baseline map of carbon emissions from deforestation in tropical regions. Science. 2012; 336(6088):1573-6. DOI: 10.1126/science.1217962. View

2.
Wang G, Luo Z, Han P, Chen H, Xu J . Critical carbon input to maintain current soil organic carbon stocks in global wheat systems. Sci Rep. 2016; 6:19327. PMC: 4725856. DOI: 10.1038/srep19327. View

3.
Lal R . Soil carbon sequestration impacts on global climate change and food security. Science. 2004; 304(5677):1623-7. DOI: 10.1126/science.1097396. View

4.
Teixeira R, Morais T, Domingos T . Consolidating Regionalized Global Characterization Factors for Soil Organic Carbon Depletion Due to Land Occupation and Transformation. Environ Sci Technol. 2018; 52(21):12436-12444. DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.8b00721. View

5.
Jebari A, Del Prado A, Pardo G, Martin J, Alvaro-Fuentes J . Modeling Regional Effects of Climate Change on Soil Organic Carbon in Spain. J Environ Qual. 2018; 47(4):644-653. DOI: 10.2134/jeq2017.07.0294. View