» Articles » PMID: 31534946

The Dawn of Geostationary Air Quality Monitoring: Case Studies from Seoul and Los Angeles

Overview
Date 2019 Sep 20
PMID 31534946
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

With the near-future launch of geostationary pollution monitoring satellite instruments over North America, East Asia, and Europe, the air quality community is preparing for an integrated global atmospheric composition observing system at unprecedented spatial and temporal resolutions. One of the ways that NASA has supported this community preparation is through demonstration of future space-borne capabilities using the Geostationary Trace gas and Aerosol Sensor Optimization (GeoTASO) airborne instrument. This paper integrates repeated high-resolution maps from GeoTASO, ground-based Pandora spectrometers, and low Earth orbit measurements from the Ozone Mapping and Profiler Suite (OMPS), for case studies over two metropolitan areas: Seoul, South Korea on June 9, 2016 and Los Angeles, California on June 27, 2017. This dataset provides a unique opportunity to illustrate how geostationary air quality monitoring platforms and ground-based remote sensing networks will close the current spatiotemporal observation gap. GeoTASO observes large differences in diurnal behavior between these urban areas, with NO accumulating within the Seoul Metropolitan Area through the day but NO peaking in the morning and decreasing throughout the afternoon in the Los Angeles Basin. In both areas, the earliest morning maps exhibit spatial patterns similar to emission source areas (e.g., urbanized valleys, roadways, major airports). These spatial patterns change later in the day due to boundary layer dynamics, horizontal transport, and chemistry. The nominal resolution of GeoTASO is finer than will be obtained from geostationary platforms, but when NO data over Los Angeles are up-scaled to the expected resolution of TEMPO, spatial features discussed are conserved. Pandora instruments installed in both metropolitan areas capture the diurnal patterns observed by GeoTASO, continuously and over longer time periods, and will play a critical role in validation of the next generation of satellite measurement.. These case studies demonstrate that different regions can have diverse diurnal patterns and that day-to-day variability due to meteorology or anthropogenic patterns such as weekday/weekend variations in emissions is large. Low Earth orbit measurements, despite their inability to capture the diurnal patterns at fine spatial resolution, will be essential for intercalibrating the geostationary radiances and cross-validating the geostationary retrievals in an integrated global observing system.

Citing Articles

NO retrievals from NOAA-20 OMPS: Algorithm, evaluation, and observations of drastic changes during COVID-19.

Huang X, Yang K, Kondragunta S, Wei Z, Valin L, Szykman J Atmos Environ (1994). 2022; :119367.

PMID: 36092473 PMC: 9441478. DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2022.119367.


Comprehensive evaluations of diurnal NO measurements during DISCOVER-AQ 2011: effects of resolution-dependent representation of NO emissions.

Li J, Wang Y, Zhang R, Smeltzer C, Weinheimer A, Herman J Atmos Chem Phys. 2022; 21(14):11133-11160.

PMID: 35949546 PMC: 9359208. DOI: 10.5194/acp-21-11133-2021.


Overview of the Lake Michigan Ozone Study 2017.

Stanier C, Pierce R, Abdi-Oskouei M, Adelman Z, Al-Saadi J, Alwe H Bull Am Meteorol Soc. 2022; 102(12):E2207-E2225.

PMID: 35837596 PMC: 9275376. DOI: 10.1175/BAMS-D-20-0061.1.


Augmenting the Standard Operating Procedures of Health and Air Quality Stakeholders With NASA Resources.

Duncan B, Malings C, Knowland K, Anderson D, Prados A, Keller C Geohealth. 2021; 5(9):e2021GH000451.

PMID: 34585034 PMC: 8456713. DOI: 10.1029/2021GH000451.


Evaluating Sentinel-5P TROPOMI tropospheric NO column densities with airborne and Pandora spectrometers near New York City and Long Island Sound.

Judd L, Al-Saadi J, Szykman J, Valin L, Janz S, Kowalewski M Atmos Meas Tech. 2021; 13(11):6113-6140.

PMID: 34122664 PMC: 8193800. DOI: 10.5194/amt-13-6113-2020.


References
1.
Jaegle L, Steinberger L, Martin R, Chance K . Global partitioning of NOx sources using satellite observations: relative roles of fossil fuel combustion, biomass burning and soil emissions. Faraday Discuss. 2005; 130:407-23. DOI: 10.1039/b502128f. View

2.
Zoogman P, Liu X, Suleiman R, Pennington W, Flittner D, Al-Saadi J . Tropospheric Emissions: Monitoring of Pollution (TEMPO). J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transf. 2020; 186:17-39. PMC: 7430511. DOI: 10.1016/j.jqsrt.2016.05.008. View

3.
Russell A, Valin L, Bucsela E, Wenig M, Cohen R . Space-based constraints on spatial and temporal patterns of NO(x) emissions in California, 2005-2008. Environ Sci Technol. 2010; 44(9):3608-15. DOI: 10.1021/es903451j. View

4.
Travis K, Jacob D, Fisher J, Kim P, Marais E, Zhu L . Why do Models Overestimate Surface Ozone in the Southeastern United States?. Atmos Chem Phys. 2018; 16(21):13561-13577. PMC: 5880041. DOI: 10.5194/acp-16-13561-2016. View

5.
Knepp T, Pippin M, Crawford J, Chen G, Szykman J, Long R . Estimating surface NO and SO mixing ratios from fast-response total column observations and potential application to geostationary missions. J Atmos Chem. 2015; 72(3-4):261-286. PMC: 4665805. DOI: 10.1007/s10874-013-9257-6. View