» Articles » PMID: 31533798

Habitat-related Differences in Song Structure and Complexity in a Songbird with a Large Repertoire

Overview
Journal BMC Ecol
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2019 Sep 20
PMID 31533798
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Urbanisation has been shown to influence many aspects of animal vocal communication. Much attention has been paid to anthropogenic noise, which is often described as one of the most challenging disturbances for urban dwellers. While a large body of literature describes associations between vocal behavior of avian populations and background noise level, most of these studies were conducted on species with relatively simple songs and small repertoire sizes. This study focuses on the song thrush, Turdus philomelos, a common Eurasian songbird with a complex singing style and large syllable repertoire. Our objective was to determine whether frequency, repertoire and temporal organisation of song parameters vary between birds inhabiting urban and adjacent forest habitats in which ambient noise levels differ.

Results: Songs of urban males were found to be more complex than in conspecifics from natural forest populations. Urban dwellers possessed greater syllable repertoires and repeated syllable sequences more often. In addition, they used a smaller proportion of whistles and a higher proportion of twitter syllables when singing compared to the nonurban males. Moreover, we found significant differences in the minimum and peak frequency of the whistle syllable between studied populations.

Conclusions: These findings may be an example of adaptation of acoustic communication in noisy urban environments, but we also discuss other possible explanations. We emphasize the need for further investigation into the relationships between birdsong and habitat characteristics, male quality, population density and ambient noise level in populations occupying urban and nonurban habitats.

Citing Articles

The adaptation and fitness costs to urban noise in the calls of the tree sparrow (Passer montanus).

Cho D, Lee J, Jang J, Son J, Sung H Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):5359.

PMID: 39948397 PMC: 11825673. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-88287-8.


Natural Patterns in the Dawn and Dusk Choruses of a Neotropical Songbird in Relation to an Urban Sound Environment.

Bustamante N, Garitano-Zavala A Animals (Basel). 2024; 14(4).

PMID: 38396616 PMC: 10886165. DOI: 10.3390/ani14040646.


Sexual selection for both diversity and repetition in birdsong.

Sierro J, de Kort S, Hartley I Nat Commun. 2023; 14(1):3600.

PMID: 37328501 PMC: 10275917. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-39308-5.


Subspecies Taxonomy and Inter-Population Divergences of the Critically Endangered Yellow-Breasted Bunting: Evidence from Song Variations.

Bao W, Kathait A, Li X, Ozaki K, Hanada Y, Thomas A Animals (Basel). 2022; 12(17).

PMID: 36078012 PMC: 9454650. DOI: 10.3390/ani12172292.


A preliminary comparison of a songbird's song repertoire size and other song measures between an urban and a rural site.

Brewer D, Fudickar A Ecol Evol. 2022; 12(2):e8602.

PMID: 35222968 PMC: 8848481. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.8602.


References
1.
Templeton C, Zollinger S, Brumm H . Traffic noise drowns out great tit alarm calls. Curr Biol. 2016; 26(22):R1173-R1174. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2016.09.058. View

2.
Hough 2nd , Nelson , Volman . Re-expression of songs deleted during vocal development in white-crowned sparrows, Zonotrichia leucophrys. Anim Behav. 2000; 60(3):279-287. DOI: 10.1006/anbe.2000.1498. View

3.
Pollard K, Blumstein D . Evolving communicative complexity: insights from rodents and beyond. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2012; 367(1597):1869-78. PMC: 3367702. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2011.0221. View

4.
Verzijden M, Ripmeester E, Ohms V, Snelderwaard P, Slabbekoorn H . Immediate spectral flexibility in singing chiffchaffs during experimental exposure to highway noise. J Exp Biol. 2010; 213(Pt 15):2575-81. DOI: 10.1242/jeb.038299. View

5.
Tryjanowski P, Skorka P, Sparks T, Biadun W, Brauze T, Hetmanski T . Urban and rural habitats differ in number and type of bird feeders and in bird species consuming supplementary food. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2015; 22(19):15097-103. PMC: 4592493. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-015-4723-0. View