» Articles » PMID: 31533693

The Effect of Smoke-free Legislation on the Mortality Rate of Acute Myocardial Infarction: a Meta-analysis

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Public Health
Date 2019 Sep 20
PMID 31533693
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Several studies have demonstrated that smoke-free legislation is associated with a reduced risk of mortality from acute myocardial infarction (AMI). This study aimed to examine and quantify the potential effect of smoke-free legislation on AMI mortality rate in different countries.

Methods: Studies were identified using a systematic search of the scientific literature from electronic databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, Embase, Google Scholar, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), from their inception through September 30, 2017. A random effects model was employed to estimate the overall effects of smoke-free legislation on the AMI mortality rate. Subgroup analysis was performed to explore the possible causes of heterogeneity in risk estimates based on sex and age. The results of meta-analysis after excluding the studies with a high risk of bias were reported in this study.

Results: A total of 10 eligible studies with 16 estimates of effect size were included in this meta-analysis. Significant heterogeneity in the risk estimates was identified (overall I = 94.6%, p < 0.001). Therefore, a random effects model was utilized to estimate the overall effect of smoke-free legislation. There was an 8% decline in AMI mortality after introducing smoke-free legislation (RR = 0.92, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.90-0.94). The results of subgroup analyses showed that smoke-free legislation was significantly associated with lower rates of mortality for the following 5 diagnostic subgroups: smoke-free in workplaces, restaurants and bars (RR = 0.92, 95% CI: 0.90-0.95), smaller sample size (RR = 0.92, 95% CI: 0.89-0.95), study location in Europe (RR = 0.90, 95% CI: 0.85-0.94), regional study area (RR = 0.92, 95% CI: 0.89-0.94), and no previous local smoke-free legislation (RR = 0.91, 95% CI: 0.90-0.93). However, there was not much difference in AMI mortality rates after the legislation between the longer (RR = 0.92, 95% CI: 0.86-0.98) and shorter follow-up duration subgroups (RR = 0.92, 95% CI: 0.89-0.94).

Conclusion: Smoke-free legislation could significantly reduce the AMI mortality rate by 8%. The reduction in the AMI mortality rate was more significant in studies with more comprehensive laws, without prior smoke-free bans, with a smaller sample size, at the regional level, and with a location in Europe.

Citing Articles

Impact of smoke-free legislation on stroke risk: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Chua Z, Yeh Lai Amanda C, Lam T, Ong J, Lim S, Kumar S Eur Stroke J. 2024; :23969873241293566.

PMID: 39475361 PMC: 11556582. DOI: 10.1177/23969873241293566.


Best practices for expansion of smoke-free and aerosol-free environments in Europe: Protocol for the consultation to experts.

Carnicer-Pont D, Luque A, Kilibarda B, Vasic M, Penzes M, Stival C Tob Prev Cessat. 2024; 10.

PMID: 39430870 PMC: 11487914. DOI: 10.18332/tpc/192786.


Association of national smoke-free policies with per-capita cigarette consumption and acute myocardial infarction mortality in Europe.

Sassano M, Mariani M, Pastorino R, Ricciardi W, La Vecchia C, Boccia S J Epidemiol Community Health. 2024; 78(6):388-394.

PMID: 38485217 PMC: 11103332. DOI: 10.1136/jech-2023-220746.


Health effects associated with exposure to secondhand smoke: a Burden of Proof study.

Flor L, Anderson J, Ahmad N, Aravkin A, Carr S, Dai X Nat Med. 2024; 30(1):149-167.

PMID: 38195750 PMC: 10803272. DOI: 10.1038/s41591-023-02743-4.


Association between the extension of smoke-free legislation and incident acute myocardial infarctions in Singapore from 2010 to 2019: an interrupted time-series analysis.

Ho J, Ho A, Jou E, Liu N, Zheng H, Aik J BMJ Glob Health. 2023; 8(10).

PMID: 37816537 PMC: 10565237. DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-012339.


References
1.
Fichtenberg C, Glantz S . Effect of smoke-free workplaces on smoking behaviour: systematic review. BMJ. 2002; 325(7357):188. PMC: 117445. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.325.7357.188. View

2.
Musk A, de Klerk N . History of tobacco and health. Respirology. 2003; 8(3):286-90. DOI: 10.1046/j.1440-1843.2003.00483.x. View

3.
Barnoya J, Glantz S . Cardiovascular effects of secondhand smoke: nearly as large as smoking. Circulation. 2005; 111(20):2684-98. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.104.492215. View

4.
Bartecchi C, Alsever R, Nevin-Woods C, Thomas W, Estacio R, Bucher Bartelson B . Reduction in the incidence of acute myocardial infarction associated with a citywide smoking ordinance. Circulation. 2006; 114(14):1490-6. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.615245. View

5.
Weisfeldt M, Zieman S . Advances in the prevention and treatment of cardiovascular disease. Health Aff (Millwood). 2007; 26(1):25-37. DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.26.1.25. View