» Articles » PMID: 31532046

Chaotic Peak Propagation in Patients with Jackhammer Esophagus

Overview
Date 2019 Sep 19
PMID 31532046
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The contractile activity of Jackhammer esophagus(JE) is heterogeneous and abnormalities in the balance of pre- and post-peak contractile activity has been reported. We observed that the progression of the peak contraction is disordered in JE patients, which reflect underlying abnormalities in the inhibitory and excitatory influence in esophageal contraction. In order to better define this abnormality, we developed novel time metrics to define trajectory of the pressure wave peak and assessed it in healthy controls and JE patients.

Methods: 38 patients with JE (ages 43-70, 19 females) and 71 asymptomatic controls (ages 19-48; 33 females) were retrospectively evaluated. High resolution manometry was performed in all subjects with 10 supine liquid swallows. The first 5 intact supine swallows and supine swallow with the greatest DCI were analyzed using ManoView™ software and customized MATLAB program. The time distance, negative time distance sum and chaotic ratio were calculated. JE patients were subcategorized by the Brief Esophageal Dysphagia Questionnaire (BEDQ) with cut-off of 6.

Key Results: Jackhammer patients had longer time distance, longer negative time distance, and higher chaotic ratio than controls( p < 0.001). The distribution of the number of negative time distances differed between JE patients with BEDQ>6 and BEDQ≤6.

Conclusions & Inferences: The trajectory of the pressure wave peak propagation commonly occurred in an unordered fashion in JE, but rarely in controls. Additionally, differences in pressure propagation trajectory was associated with higher symptom scores thus trajectory of the pressure wave peak may be an important marker of abnormal esophageal motor function.

Citing Articles

Symptom Severity Related With Contraction Peaks in Patients With Jackhammer Esophagus.

Xiao Y, Carlson D, Pandolfino J J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2021; 27(4):540-544.

PMID: 34642274 PMC: 8521457. DOI: 10.5056/jnm20229.


Esophageal motility disorders on high-resolution manometry: Chicago classification version 4.0.

Yadlapati R, Kahrilas P, Fox M, Bredenoord A, Gyawali C, Roman S Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2020; 33(1):e14058.

PMID: 33373111 PMC: 8034247. DOI: 10.1111/nmo.14058.


The hypercontractile esophagus: Still a tough nut to crack.

Savarino E, Smout A Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2020; 32(11):e14010.

PMID: 33043556 PMC: 7685127. DOI: 10.1111/nmo.14010.

References
1.
Taft T, Riehl M, Sodikoff J, Kahrilas P, Keefer L, Doerfler B . Development and validation of the brief esophageal dysphagia questionnaire. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2016; 28(12):1854-1860. PMC: 5340311. DOI: 10.1111/nmo.12889. View

2.
Xiao Y, Carlson D, Lin Z, Rinella N, Sifrim D, Pandolfino J . Assessing the pre- and postpeak phases in a swallow using esophageal pressure topography. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2017; 29(9). PMC: 5673102. DOI: 10.1111/nmo.13099. View

3.
Clouse R, Staiano A, Alrakawi A . Topographic analysis of esophageal double-peaked waves. Gastroenterology. 2000; 118(3):469-76. DOI: 10.1016/s0016-5085(00)70252-6. View

4.
Mauro A, Quader F, Tolone S, Savarino E, De Bortoli N, Franchina M . Provocative testing in patients with jackhammer esophagus: evidence for altered neural control. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2018; 316(3):G397-G403. DOI: 10.1152/ajpgi.00342.2018. View

5.
Rattan S, Gidda J, Goyal R . Membrane potential and mechanical responses of the opossum esophagus to vagal stimulation and swallowing. Gastroenterology. 1983; 85(4):922-8. View