» Articles » PMID: 31528519

The Disability Cascade: A Preventable Consequence of the Loss of Disc Height Following Lumbar Microdiscectomy

Overview
Journal Cureus
Date 2019 Sep 19
PMID 31528519
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Lumbar discectomy is a mainstay surgical treatment for herniation of the lumbar discs and is effective at treating radicular symptomology. Despite the overall success of the procedure; the potential for reherniation and reoperation is significant. To avoid this potential recurrence, surgeons often perform discectomy more aggressively, removing a larger volume of nuclear material in the hopes of minimizing the likelihood of reherniation. This approach, while beneficial in minimizing the chance of reherniation, is associated with a volumetric reduction of the nucleus within the disc space, making the disc more prone to collapse and thus inducing a significant post-operative loss of disc height. While potentially minor in isolation, the loss of disc height, in fact, impacts several aspects of overall patient well-being. We hypothesize that the loss of disc height following discectomy causes an increase in pain and subsequent disability, the combination of which ultimately impacts socioeconomic factors affecting both the patient and the healthcare system as a whole. In this report, we outline the evidence in support of this disability cascade and provide recommendations on methods for limiting its impact. Given the current focus on cost-effectiveness in healthcare decision-making, methods for limiting this potentially damaging sequence of events must be investigated.

Citing Articles

Annulus Fibrosus Repair via Interpenetration of a Non-Woven Scaffold Supports Tissue Integration and Prevents Re-Herniation.

Ongini E, Abdullah M, Engiles J, Orozco B, Moehl A, Peredo A JOR Spine. 2025; 8(1):e70045.

PMID: 39925750 PMC: 11803139. DOI: 10.1002/jsp2.70045.


Effective Management of McKenzie Derangement VI With Urge Urinary Incontinence Through Surgical Intervention and Customized Physiotherapy: A Case Report.

Kaur G, Gangwani N, Samal S Cureus. 2024; 16(10):e70610.

PMID: 39483563 PMC: 11527502. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.70610.


Correlation between Disc Imaging Observations and Clinical Efficacy after Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy: A 1-Year Follow-up Study.

Li B, Wang T, Huang Y, Fan Y, Yu H, Li A Orthop Surg. 2024; 16(4):851-863.

PMID: 38384172 PMC: 10984810. DOI: 10.1111/os.14013.


Correlation between Pain Scores and Disc Height Changes after Discectomy in Patients with Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Zheng Y, Lan T, Chen X, Hus Z, Zhang R Comput Intell Neurosci. 2022; 2022:2580004.

PMID: 36035825 PMC: 9410963. DOI: 10.1155/2022/2580004.


Effect of a strutted intradiscal spacer (DIVA®) on disc reherniation following lumbar discectomy: A 2-year retrospective matched cohort study.

Srour R, El Arbi A, Rahmouni A, Aljohani H, Orenstein D, Hoarau X J Orthop. 2021; 25:173-178.

PMID: 34025061 PMC: 8131955. DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2021.05.007.


References
1.
Carragee E, Han M, Suen P, Kim D . Clinical outcomes after lumbar discectomy for sciatica: the effects of fragment type and anular competence. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003; 85(1):102-8. View

2.
Carragee E, Spinnickie A, Alamin T, Paragioudakis S . A prospective controlled study of limited versus subtotal posterior discectomy: short-term outcomes in patients with herniated lumbar intervertebral discs and large posterior anular defect. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006; 31(6):653-7. DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000203714.76250.68. View

3.
Barth M, Diepers M, Weiss C, Thome C . Two-year outcome after lumbar microdiscectomy versus microscopic sequestrectomy: part 2: radiographic evaluation and correlation with clinical outcome. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008; 33(3):273-9. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31816201a6. View

4.
Brinckmann P, Grootenboer H . Change of disc height, radial disc bulge, and intradiscal pressure from discectomy. An in vitro investigation on human lumbar discs. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1991; 16(6):641-6. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199106000-00008. View

5.
Watters 3rd W, McGirt M . An evidence-based review of the literature on the consequences of conservative versus aggressive discectomy for the treatment of primary disc herniation with radiculopathy. Spine J. 2008; 9(3):240-57. DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2008.08.005. View