» Articles » PMID: 31522256

Fatal and Non-fatal Self-Injury in the USA: Critical Review of Current Trends and Innovations in Prevention

Overview
Publisher Current Science
Specialty Psychiatry
Date 2019 Sep 16
PMID 31522256
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose Of Review: To examine current trends in suicide and self-injury in the USA, as well as potential contributors to their change over time, and to reflect on innovations in prevention and intervention that can guide policies and programs to reduce the burden of suicide and self-injury in the USA.

Recent Findings: Suicide and non-fatal self-injury are on the rise in the USA. Reasons for such trends over time remain speculative, although they seem linked to coincident increases in mood disorders and drug use and overdose. Promising innovative prevention and intervention programs that engage new technologies, such as machine learning-derived prediction tools and computerized ecologic momentary assessments, are currently in development and require additional evidence. Recent increases in fatal and non-fatal self-harm in the USA raise questions about the causes, interventions, and preventive measures that should be taken. Most innovative prevention efforts target individuals seeking to improve risk prediction and access to evidence-based care. However, as Durkheim pointed out over 100 years ago, suicide rates vary enormously between societal groups, suggesting that certain causal factors of suicide act and, hence, should be targeted at an ecological level. In the next generation of suicide research, it is critical to examine factors beyond the proximal and clinical to allow for a reimagining of prevention that is life course and socially focused.

Citing Articles

Occupation-specific risk estimates for suicide and non-fatal self-harm from a Swedish cohort of male construction workers followed 1987-2018.

Mehlig K, Toren K, LaMontagne A, Wahlstrom V, Nyberg J, Waern M Occup Environ Med. 2024; 81(3):142-149.

PMID: 38418223 PMC: 10958292. DOI: 10.1136/oemed-2023-109246.


Evaluation of an Intensive Suicide- Reattempt–Prevention Programme based on Problem-Solving Therapy in a Catchment Area of 430,000 people in Madrid, Spain.

Ricardo A, Gonzalo M, Miguel Angel J, Mercedes N, Enrique B Actas Esp Psiquiatr. 2022; 50(3):134-143.

PMID: 35643972 PMC: 10803829.


Predictors of nonfatal suicide attempts within 30 days of discharge from psychiatric hospitalization: Sex-specific models developed using population-based registries.

Zelkowitz R, Jiang T, Horvath-Puho E, Street A, Lash T, Sorensen H J Affect Disord. 2022; 306:260-268.

PMID: 35304235 PMC: 9062818. DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2022.03.034.


Suicide and the agent-host-environment triad: leveraging surveillance sources to inform prevention.

Keyes K, Kandula S, Olfson M, Gould M, Martinez-Ales G, Rutherford C Psychol Med. 2021; 51(4):529-537.

PMID: 33663629 PMC: 8020492. DOI: 10.1017/S003329172000536X.


Why Are Suicide Rates Increasing in the United States? Towards a Multilevel Reimagination of Suicide Prevention.

Martinez-Ales G, Hernandez-Calle D, Khauli N, Keyes K Curr Top Behav Neurosci. 2020; 46:1-23.

PMID: 32860592 PMC: 8699163. DOI: 10.1007/7854_2020_158.


References
1.
Motto J, Bostrom A . A randomized controlled trial of postcrisis suicide prevention. Psychiatr Serv. 2001; 52(6):828-33. DOI: 10.1176/appi.ps.52.6.828. View

2.
Chaudhury S, Galfalvy H, Biggs E, Choo T, Mann J, Stanley B . Affect in response to stressors and coping strategies: an ecological momentary assessment study of borderline personality disorder. Borderline Personal Disord Emot Dysregul. 2017; 4:8. PMC: 5438851. DOI: 10.1186/s40479-017-0059-3. View

3.
Hawton K . Assessment of suicide risk. Br J Psychiatry. 1987; 150:145-53. DOI: 10.1192/bjp.150.2.145. View

4.
Riblet N, Shiner B, Young-Xu Y, Watts B . Strategies to prevent death by suicide: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Br J Psychiatry. 2017; 210(6):396-402. DOI: 10.1192/bjp.bp.116.187799. View

5.
Rose G . Sick individuals and sick populations. Int J Epidemiol. 2001; 30(3):427-32; discussion 433-4. DOI: 10.1093/ije/30.3.427. View