» Articles » PMID: 31521723

Studies Registered in Non-ClinicalTrials.gov Accounted for an Increasing Proportion of Protocol Registrations in Medical Research

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Public Health
Date 2019 Sep 16
PMID 31521723
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To compare the recent trends and characteristics of studies registered as non-ClinicalTrials.gov in the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP).

Study Design And Setting: We included all studies on the ICTRP from January 1, 2014, to December 31, 2018. We described the characteristics of included studies and examined whether the proportion of studies registered in non-ClinicalTrials.gov on ICTRP increased by interventional design or noninterventional design. We further compared the characteristics of studies registered in non-ClinicalTrials.gov to those registered in ClinicalTrials.gov.

Results: We identified 235,830 studies (182,771 studies having interventional design and 53,059 studies having noninterventional design). The proportion of studies registered in non-ClinicalTrials.gov among studies registered on ICTRP increased from 2014 to 2018 (38.3% to 53.3% overall, 39.3% to 53.0% for interventional design, and 34.1% to 54.2% for noninterventional design). Studies registered in non-ClinicalTrials.gov were more often retrospectively registered as interventional design and lacked sufficient information about target sample sizes than studies registered in ClinicalTrials.gov irrespective of study design.

Conclusion: Studies registered in non-ClinicalTrials.gov increasingly accounted for the proportion of protocol registration among the ICTRP irrespective of study designs since 2014. Systematic reviewers should search ICTRP in addition to ClinicalTrials.gov.

Citing Articles

The Maastricht Intensive Care COVID Cohort: A Critical Appraisal of the Predefined Research Questions.

Wintjens M, Aydeniz E, van Rosmalen F, Driessen R, Hulshof A, Bergmans D Crit Care Explor. 2025; 7(2):e1211.

PMID: 39899442 PMC: 11793260. DOI: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000001211.


Completion and reporting of COVID-19 clinical trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov during the first 6 months of the pandemic: cohort study.

Tornhammar P, Julner A, Al Moosawi N, Wicksell E, Lim C, Andersson D BMJ Open. 2024; 14(11):e085906.

PMID: 39542470 PMC: 11575289. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085906.


Are orthopedic clinical trials representative? An analysis of race and ethnicity reported in clinical trials between 2007 and 2022 : Running title: representation of clinical trials in orthopedic surgery.

Hecht Ii C, Friedl S, Ong C, Burkhart R, Porto J, Kamath A Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024; 144(5):1977-1987.

PMID: 38554209 DOI: 10.1007/s00402-024-05285-7.


The international clinical trials registry platform (ICTRP): data integrity and the trends in clinical trials, diseases, and drugs.

Namiot E, Smirnovova D, Sokolov A, Chubarev V, Tarasov V, Schioth H Front Pharmacol. 2023; 14:1228148.

PMID: 37790806 PMC: 10544909. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1228148.


Analysis of Rates of Completion, Delays, and Participant Recruitment in Randomized Clinical Trials in Surgery.

Shadbolt C, Naufal E, Bunzli S, Price V, Rele S, Schilling C JAMA Netw Open. 2023; 6(1):e2250996.

PMID: 36648945 PMC: 9857498. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.50996.