Identifying Pulmonary Nodules or Masses on Chest Radiography Using Deep Learning: External Validation and Strategies to Improve Clinical Practice
Overview
Affiliations
Aim: To test the diagnostic performance of a deep learning-based system for the detection of clinically significant pulmonary nodules/masses on chest radiographs.
Materials And Methods: Using a retrospective study of 100 patients (47 with clinically significant pulmonary nodules/masses and 53 control subjects without pulmonary nodules), two radiologists verified clinically significantly pulmonary nodules/masses according to chest computed tomography (CT) findings. A computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) software using a deep-learning approach was used to detect pulmonary nodules/masses to determine the diagnostic performance in four algorithms (heat map, abnormal probability, nodule probability, and mass probability).
Results: A total of 100 cases were included in the analysis. Among the four algorithms, mass algorithm could achieve a 76.6% sensitivity (36/47, 11 false negative) and 88.68% specificity (47/53, six false-positive) in the detection of pulmonary nodules/masses at the optimal probability score cut-off of 0.2884. Compared to the other three algorithms, mass probability algorithm had best predictive ability for pulmonary nodule/mass detection at the optimal probability score cut-off of 0.2884 (AUC: 0.916 versus AUC: 0.682, p<0.001; AUC: 0.916 versus AUC: 0.810, p=0.002; AUC: 0.916 versus AUC: 0.813, p=0.014).
Conclusion: In conclusion, the deep-learning based computer-aided diagnosis system will likely play a vital role in the early detection and diagnosis of pulmonary nodules/masses on chest radiographs. In future applications, these algorithms could support triage workflow via double reading to improve sensitivity and specificity during the diagnostic process.
El-Gedaily M, Euler A, Guldimann M, Schulz B, Aghapour Zangeneh F, Prause A Medicine (Baltimore). 2025; 103(47):e40485.
PMID: 39809217 PMC: 11596649. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000040485.
Kim J, Ryu W, Kim D, Kim E Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):15967.
PMID: 38987309 PMC: 11237128. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-66530-y.
Bhatia B, Morlese J, Yusuf S, Xie Y, Schallhorn B, Gruen D BJR Open. 2024; 6(1):tzad009.
PMID: 38352188 PMC: 10860529. DOI: 10.1093/bjro/tzad009.
Ma Y, Zhang X, Yi Z, Ding L, Cai B, Jiang Z Cancer Med. 2024; 13(3):e6854.
PMID: 38189547 PMC: 10904961. DOI: 10.1002/cam4.6854.
A Systematic Literature Review of 3D Deep Learning Techniques in Computed Tomography Reconstruction.
Rahman H, Khan A, Sadiq T, Farooqi A, Khan I, Lim W Tomography. 2023; 9(6):2158-2189.
PMID: 38133073 PMC: 10748093. DOI: 10.3390/tomography9060169.