» Articles » PMID: 31521138

Diagnosis and Management of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis in Primary Care in France: a Survey of General Practitioners

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialties Orthopedics
Physiology
Date 2019 Sep 16
PMID 31521138
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is a common spinal condition and the most frequent indication for spinal surgery in elderly people. General practitioners (GPs) are on the 1 line for its diagnosis and treatment. We aimed to assess how GPs diagnose and treat people with LSS in France.

Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional survey in a primary care setting. French GPs were selected by a random draw from the French Medical Board. The questionnaire was designed by 3 physicians specialized in physical and rehabilitation medicine and a resident in general practice. A provisional questionnaire was tested in a pilot survey of 11 French GPs. Participants' feedbacks served to build the final questionnaire. This latter was submitted by e-mail or mail to 330 GPs. GPs were surveyed about the 3 main domains relevant to the management of people with LSS in primary care: 1/ diagnosis, 2/ pharmacological treatments and 3/ non-pharmacological treatments, using self-administered open- and closed-ended questions and visual analog scales.

Results: Overall, 90/330 (27.3%) GPs completed the survey. 51/89 (57.3%) GPs were confident with managing people with LSS. Low back pain 51/87 (58.6%), neurogenic claudication 38/87 (43.7%) and paresthesia in the lower limbs 31/87 (35.6%) were the 3 most frequently cited clinical signs leading to the diagnosis of LSS. Improvement with lumbar flexion was mentioned by 9/87 (10.3%) GPs. 85/86 (98.8%) would consider prescribing lumbar imaging, 60/84 (71.4%) corticoid spinal injections and 42/79 (53.2%) would never prescribe lumbar flexion-based endurance training. All GPs would refer people with LSS to another specialist.

Conclusions: French GPs lack confidence with diagnosing LSS and prescribing pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments for people with LSS.

Citing Articles

A Rare Case of Bilateral Foot Drop Following Cervical Decompression in Tandem Spinal Stenosis.

Ishfaq M, George R, Tan G Cureus. 2025; 16(12):e76581.

PMID: 39877785 PMC: 11774600. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.76581.


Older Adults' Experiences Living With and Having Spine Surgery for Degenerative Spine Disease.

Strayer A, King B Gerontologist. 2022; 63(7):1201-1210.

PMID: 36516467 PMC: 10448989. DOI: 10.1093/geront/gnac184.


Comparison of Postoperative Outcomes Between Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.

Lin L, Liu X, Shi L, Cheng S, Wang Z, Ge Q Front Surg. 2022; 9:916087.

PMID: 35784932 PMC: 9240389. DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.916087.


Caudal epidural steroid injections versus selective nerve root blocks for single-level lumbar spinal stenosis: a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Osman A, Hu W, Jianhua-Sun , Li J, Luo X, Han N Trials. 2021; 22(1):524.

PMID: 34372906 PMC: 8351452. DOI: 10.1186/s13063-021-05485-1.

References
1.
Iversen M, Fossel A, Katz J . Enhancing function in older adults with chronic low back pain: a pilot study of endurance training. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003; 84(9):1324-31. DOI: 10.1016/s0003-9993(03)00198-9. View

2.
White K, Williams T, Greenberg B . The ecology of medical care. N Engl J Med. 1961; 265:885-92. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM196111022651805. View

3.
Eysenbach G . Improving the quality of Web surveys: the Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys (CHERRIES). J Med Internet Res. 2004; 6(3):e34. PMC: 1550605. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.6.3.e34. View

4.
Perrot S . [Management strategies for the treatment of non malignant chronic pain in the elderly]. Psychol Neuropsychiatr Vieil. 2006; 4(3):163-70. View

5.
Aota Y, Niwa T, Yoshikawa K, Fujiwara A, Asada T, Saito T . Magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance myelography in the presurgical diagnosis of lumbar foraminal stenosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007; 32(8):896-903. DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000259809.75760.d5. View