» Articles » PMID: 31519795

Compliance of E-cigarette Refill Liquids with Regulations on Labelling, Packaging and Technical Design Characteristics in Nine European Member States

Overview
Journal Tob Control
Specialty Psychiatry
Date 2019 Sep 15
PMID 31519795
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To evaluate electronic cigarette (e-cigarette) product compliance with European regulations (Tobacco Products Directive (TPD), Implementing Decisions), with a focus on labelling/packaging practices and technical design/safety features.

Methods: Before the implementation of the TPD, in early 2016, we randomly selected e-cigarette refill liquids from the five top-selling companies in France, Poland, Germany, Netherlands, UK, Spain, Romania, Hungary and Greece. Identical products were purchased after the implementation of the TPD (early 2018) and assessment of compliance was performed on self-matched samples (n=107) using a prospective cohort design. Compliance with the Classification, Labelling and Packaging (CLP) regulations was also evaluated.

Results: Following the implementation of the TPD, improvements were noted with regards to the existence of text-only warnings (32.7% pre vs 86.0% post, p<0.001), child-resistant fastenings (93.3% pre vs 100.0% post, p=0.016), tamper-proof vials (58.9% pre vs 86.9%, post p<0.001) and maximum refill volume ≤10 mL in vials (86.9% pre vs 94.4% post, p=0.008). Lower compliance was noted with regards to the inclusion of a leaflet (26.2% pre vs 53.3% post, p<0.001), refilling instructions (28.0% pre vs 51.4% post, p<0.001) and health warnings on the box, vial or leaflet (32.7% pre vs 86.0%, p<0.001). Overall, 86.0% of products had a warning label in the post-TPD phase in comparison to 32.7% of products before the implementation of the TPD (p<0.001). Compliance with the CLP regulations, also increased in the post TPD follow-up phase.

Conclusions: This is the first study to evaluate the level of implementation of the e-cigarette regulations in nine EU member states. Our results indicate that refill liquids had substantial but not full compliance in most of the characteristics evaluated. Further effort is needed to ensure complete compliance.

Citing Articles

Dose by design: How limits on nicotine flux and puff duration affect the abuse liability of electronic nicotine delivery systems.

Bono R, White A, Imran R, Maldonado G, Lipato T, Barnes A Drug Alcohol Depend. 2024; 266():112508.

PMID: 39657440 PMC: 11736901. DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2024.112508.


A Content Analysis of Nicotine Descriptors on the Front of Vape Packaging in the United Kingdom.

Ford A, MacKintosh A, Morgan A, Jones D, Moodie C, Hunt K Nicotine Tob Res. 2024; 27(1):152-156.

PMID: 39051935 PMC: 11663797. DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntae168.


A systematic review for the impacts of global approaches to regulating electronic nicotine products.

Yan D, Wang Z, Laestadius L, Mosalpuria K, Wilson F, Yan A J Glob Health. 2023; 13:04076.

PMID: 37622721 PMC: 10451104. DOI: 10.7189/jogh.13.04076.


E-Liquids from Seven European Countries-Warnings Analysis and Freebase Nicotine Content.

Bebenek P, Gholap V, Halquist M, Sobczak A, Kosmider L Toxics. 2022; 10(2).

PMID: 35202238 PMC: 8875468. DOI: 10.3390/toxics10020051.


Changes in electronic cigarette use and label awareness among smokers before and after the European Tobacco Products Directive implementation in six European countries: findings from the EUREST-PLUS ITC Europe Surveys.

Nikitara K, Girvalaki C, N Kyriakos C, Driezen P, Filippidis F, Kahnert S Eur J Public Health. 2020; 30(Suppl_3):iii62-iii67.

PMID: 32918814 PMC: 7526788. DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckaa081.