» Articles » PMID: 31516600

Prognostic Value of EGFR 19-del and 21-L858R Mutations in Patients with Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

Overview
Journal Oncol Lett
Specialty Oncology
Date 2019 Sep 14
PMID 31516600
Citations 30
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Previous studies have demonstrated a significant difference in clinical characteristics between patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring exon 19 deletion (19-del) and an exon point mutation (21-L858R) in EGFR. The present retrospective study aimed to investigate the differential prognosis in patients with NSCLC harboring exon 19-del and 21-L858R mutations. The clinical and follow-up data of 137 patients treated at the Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University (Wuhan, Hubei, China) between August 2012 and August 2016, who were diagnosed with stage IIIB-IV NSCLC harboring either exon 19-del or 21-L858R mutations, were analyzed. The patients were divided into the first-line tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), first-line chemotherapy and second-line TKI treatment groups. The median progression-free survival (PFS) time of patients harboring the exon 19-del mutation was significantly improved compared with that in patients harboring the 21-L858R mutation (11.3 vs. 8.8 months, respectively; P=0.017) following first-line TKI treatments. However, no significant difference in the median PFS time was observed between the exon 19-del and 21-L858R groups following the first-line chemotherapy or second-line TKI treatment. In patients with the exon 19-del, first-line TKI treatment achieved an increased objective response rate (ORR; 51.9 vs. 18.5%; P=0.004) and disease control rate (96.2 vs. 77.8%; P=0.030), and a longer PFS time (11.3 vs. 8.0 months; P=0.034) compared with that in the patients following first-line chemotherapy. First- and second-line TKI treatment achieved a similar PFS time (11.3 vs. 11.0 months, respectively; P=0.140). However, in patients with the 21-L858R mutation, the first-line TKI therapy and first-line chemotherapy groups exhibited a similar PFS time (8.8 vs. 3.5 months, respectively; P=0.063), while the second-line TKI treatment group exhibited a significantly longer PFS time compared with the first-line TKI treatment group (13.6 vs. 8.8 months, respectively; P=0.030). There was a differential sensitivity to treatment between patients harboring the exon 19-del and 21-L858R mutations. Therefore, chemotherapy may increase the sensitivity to TKIs in patients harboring the 21-L858R mutation.

Citing Articles

Patients with non‑small cell lung cancer with the exon 21 L858R mutation: From distinct mechanisms to epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatments (Review).

Liu J, Wang S, Yuan H, Li J, Xing P Oncol Lett. 2025; 29(3):109.

PMID: 39776649 PMC: 11704875. DOI: 10.3892/ol.2024.14855.


Clinical characteristics of EGFR-ctDNA shedders in EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients.

Ruglioni M, Petrini I, Crucitta S, Sbrana A, Luculli G, Sadeghi Gol L Transl Oncol. 2024; 52:102228.

PMID: 39709717 PMC: 11832947. DOI: 10.1016/j.tranon.2024.102228.


High throughput virtual screening and validation of Plant-Based EGFR L858R kinase inhibitors against Non-Small cell lung Cancer: An integrated approach Utilizing GC-MS, network Pharmacology, Docking, and molecular dynamics.

Gao K, Chen Z, Zhang N, Jiang P Saudi Pharm J. 2024; 32(9):102139.

PMID: 39139718 PMC: 11318564. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsps.2024.102139.


Real-world efficacy of low dose osimertinib as second-line treatment in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor-mutated advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Poh M, Balakrishnan S, Tan S, Abidin M, Liam C, Tan J Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2024; 13(7):1649-1659.

PMID: 39118879 PMC: 11304135. DOI: 10.21037/tlcr-24-243.


Brain metastasis magnetic resonance imaging-based deep learning for predicting epidermal growth factor receptor () mutation and subtypes in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer.

Cao R, Fu L, Huang B, Liu Y, Wang X, Liu J Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2024; 14(7):4749-4762.

PMID: 39022238 PMC: 11250349. DOI: 10.21037/qims-23-1744.


References
1.
Lynch T, Bell D, Sordella R, Gurubhagavatula S, Okimoto R, Brannigan B . Activating mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor underlying responsiveness of non-small-cell lung cancer to gefitinib. N Engl J Med. 2004; 350(21):2129-39. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa040938. View

2.
Paez J, Janne P, Lee J, Tracy S, Greulich H, Gabriel S . EGFR mutations in lung cancer: correlation with clinical response to gefitinib therapy. Science. 2004; 304(5676):1497-500. DOI: 10.1126/science.1099314. View

3.
Sordella R, Bell D, Haber D, Settleman J . Gefitinib-sensitizing EGFR mutations in lung cancer activate anti-apoptotic pathways. Science. 2004; 305(5687):1163-7. DOI: 10.1126/science.1101637. View

4.
Pao W, Miller V, Politi K, Riely G, Somwar R, Zakowski M . Acquired resistance of lung adenocarcinomas to gefitinib or erlotinib is associated with a second mutation in the EGFR kinase domain. PLoS Med. 2005; 2(3):e73. PMC: 549606. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0020073. View

5.
Risbud M, Fertala J, Vresilovic E, Albert T, Shapiro I . Nucleus pulposus cells upregulate PI3K/Akt and MEK/ERK signaling pathways under hypoxic conditions and resist apoptosis induced by serum withdrawal. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005; 30(8):882-9. DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000159096.11248.6d. View