» Articles » PMID: 31509813

A Monte Carlo Model for Organ Dose Reconstruction of Patients in Pencil Beam Scanning (PBS) Proton Therapy for Epidemiologic Studies of Late Effects

Overview
Journal J Radiol Prot
Specialty Radiology
Date 2019 Sep 12
PMID 31509813
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Significant efforts such as the Pediatric Proton/Photon Consortium Registry (PPCR) involving multiple proton therapy centers have been made to conduct collaborative studies evaluating outcomes following proton therapy. As a groundwork dosimetry effort for the late effect investigation, we developed a Monte Carlo (MC) model of proton pencil beam scanning (PBS) to estimate organ/tissue doses of pediatric patients at the Maryland Proton Treatment Center (MPTC), one of the proton centers involved in the PPCR. The MC beam modeling was performed using the TOPAS (TOol for PArticle Simulation) MC code and commissioned to match measurement data within 1% for range, and 0.3 mm for spot sizes. The established MC model was then tested by calculating organ/tissue doses for sample intracranial and craniospinal irradiations on whole-body pediatric computational human phantoms. The simulated dose distributions were compared with the treatment planning system dose distributions, showing the 3 mm/3% gamma index passing rates of 94%-99%, validating our simulations with the MC model. The calculated organ/tissue doses per prescribed doses for the craniospinal irradiations (1 mGy Gy to 1 Gy Gy) were generally much higher than those for the intracranial irradiations (2.1 μGy Gy to 0.1 Gy Gy), which is due to the larger field coverage of the craniospinal irradiations. The largest difference was observed at the adrenal dose, i.e. ∼3000 times. In addition, the calculated organ/tissue doses were compared with those calculated with a simplified MC model, showing that the beam properties (i.e. spot size, spot divergence, mean energy, and energy spread) do not significantly influence dose calculations despite the limited irradiation cases. This implies that the use of the MC model commissioned to the MPTC measurement data might be dosimetrically acceptable for patient dose reconstructions at other proton centers particularly when their measurement data are unavailable. The developed MC model will be used to reconstruct organ/tissue doses for MPTC pediatric patients collected in the PPCR.

Citing Articles

A framework for in-field and out-of-field patient specific secondary cancer risk estimates from treatment plans using the TOPAS Monte Carlo system.

Meyer I, Peters N, Tamborino G, Lee H, Bertolet A, Faddegon B Phys Med Biol. 2024; 69(16).

PMID: 39019051 PMC: 11345907. DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ad64b6.


The Pediatric Proton and Photon Therapy Comparison Cohort: Study Design for a Multicenter Retrospective Cohort to Investigate Subsequent Cancers After Pediatric Radiation Therapy.

Berrington de Gonzalez A, Gibson T, Lee C, Albert P, Griffin K, Kitahara C Adv Radiat Oncol. 2023; 8(6):101273.

PMID: 38047226 PMC: 10692298. DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2023.101273.


Complete patient exposure during paediatric brain cancer treatment for photon and proton therapy techniques including imaging procedures.

De Saint-Hubert M, Boissonnat G, Schneider U, Baumer C, Verbeek N, Esser J Front Oncol. 2023; 13:1222800.

PMID: 37795436 PMC: 10546320. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1222800.


Comparison of out-of-field normal tissue dose estimates for pencil beam scanning proton therapy: MCNP6, PHITS, and TOPAS.

Griffin K, Yeom Y, Mille M, Lee C, Jung J, Hertel N Biomed Phys Eng Express. 2022; 9(1).

PMID: 36562506 PMC: 10772933. DOI: 10.1088/2057-1976/acaab1.


Fetal dose from proton pencil beam scanning craniospinal irradiation during pregnancy: a Monte Carlo study.

Yeom Y, Griffin K, Mille M, Lee C, OReilly S, Dong L Phys Med Biol. 2022; 67(3).

PMID: 35026741 PMC: 9890509. DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ac4b38.


References
1.
Trinkl S, Mares V, Englbrecht F, Wilkens J, Wielunski M, Parodi K . Systematic out-of-field secondary neutron spectrometry and dosimetry in pencil beam scanning proton therapy. Med Phys. 2017; 44(5):1912-1920. DOI: 10.1002/mp.12206. View

2.
Perl J, Shin J, Schumann J, Faddegon B, Paganetti H . TOPAS: an innovative proton Monte Carlo platform for research and clinical applications. Med Phys. 2012; 39(11):6818-37. PMC: 3493036. DOI: 10.1118/1.4758060. View

3.
Hess C, Indelicato D, Paulino A, Hartsell W, Hill-Kayser C, Perkins S . An Update From the Pediatric Proton Consortium Registry. Front Oncol. 2018; 8:165. PMC: 5976731. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2018.00165. View

4.
Brenner D, Hall E . Secondary neutrons in clinical proton radiotherapy: a charged issue. Radiother Oncol. 2008; 86(2):165-70. DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2007.12.003. View

5.
Eley J, Newhauser W, Homann K, Howell R, Schneider C, Durante M . Implementation of an analytical model for leakage neutron equivalent dose in a proton radiotherapy planning system. Cancers (Basel). 2015; 7(1):427-38. PMC: 4381266. DOI: 10.3390/cancers7010427. View