» Articles » PMID: 31509534

Research Applications of Primary Biodiversity Databases in the Digital Age

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2019 Sep 12
PMID 31509534
Citations 27
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Our world is in the midst of unprecedented change-climate shifts and sustained, widespread habitat degradation have led to dramatic declines in biodiversity rivaling historical extinction events. At the same time, new approaches to publishing and integrating previously disconnected data resources promise to help provide the evidence needed for more efficient and effective conservation and management. Stakeholders have invested considerable resources to contribute to online databases of species occurrences. However, estimates suggest that only 10% of biocollections are available in digital form. The biocollections community must therefore continue to promote digitization efforts, which in part requires demonstrating compelling applications of the data. Our overarching goal is therefore to determine trends in use of mobilized species occurrence data since 2010, as online systems have grown and now provide over one billion records. To do this, we characterized 501 papers that use openly accessible biodiversity databases. Our standardized tagging protocol was based on key topics of interest, including: database(s) used, taxa addressed, general uses of data, other data types linked to species occurrence data, and data quality issues addressed. We found that the most common uses of online biodiversity databases have been to estimate species distribution and richness, to outline data compilation and publication, and to assist in developing species checklists or describing new species. Only 69% of papers in our dataset addressed one or more aspects of data quality, which is low considering common errors and biases known to exist in opportunistic datasets. Globally, we find that biodiversity databases are still in the initial stages of data compilation. Novel and integrative applications are restricted to certain taxonomic groups and regions with higher numbers of quality records. Continued data digitization, publication, enhancement, and quality control efforts are necessary to make biodiversity science more efficient and relevant in our fast-changing environment.

Citing Articles

Climatic and edaphic niche shifts during plant radiation in the Mediterranean biodiversity hotspot.

Fernandez-Mazuecos M, Glover B Ann Bot. 2024; 135(4):717-734.

PMID: 39673382 PMC: 11904899. DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcae205.


African bat database: curated data of occurrences, distributions and conservation metrics for sub-Saharan bats.

Monadjem A, Montauban C, Webala P, Laverty T, Bakwo-Fils E, Torrent L Sci Data. 2024; 11(1):1309.

PMID: 39622813 PMC: 11611906. DOI: 10.1038/s41597-024-04170-7.


Data mobilisation at the Fund of Invertebrates of the State Museum of Natural History of the NAS of Ukraine.

Novikov A, Rizun V, Susulovsky A, Hushtan H, Hushtan K, Kuzyarin O Biodivers Data J. 2024; 12:e131188.

PMID: 39206123 PMC: 11350277. DOI: 10.3897/BDJ.12.e131188.


Biodiversity patterns of epipelagic copepods in the South Pacific Ocean: Strengths and limitations of current data bases.

Perez-Aragon M, Escribano R, Rivera R, Hidalgo P PLoS One. 2024; 19(7):e0306440.

PMID: 38991030 PMC: 11238982. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0306440.


How to fill the biodiversity data gap: Is it better to invest in fieldwork or curation?.

Vargas C, Bottin M, Sarkinen T, Richardson J, Celis M, Villanueva B Plant Divers. 2024; 46(1):39-48.

PMID: 38343600 PMC: 10851292. DOI: 10.1016/j.pld.2023.06.003.


References
1.
Tydecks L, Jeschke J, Wolf M, Singer G, Tockner K . Spatial and topical imbalances in biodiversity research. PLoS One. 2018; 13(7):e0199327. PMC: 6033392. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0199327. View

2.
McMurry J, Juty N, Blomberg N, Burdett T, Conlin T, Conte N . Identifiers for the 21st century: How to design, provision, and reuse persistent identifiers to maximize utility and impact of life science data. PLoS Biol. 2017; 15(6):e2001414. PMC: 5490878. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2001414. View

3.
Wilkinson M, Dumontier M, Aalbersberg I, Appleton G, Axton M, Baak A . The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Sci Data. 2016; 3:160018. PMC: 4792175. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2016.18. View

4.
Otegui J, Guralnick R . The geospatial data quality REST API for primary biodiversity data. Bioinformatics. 2016; 32(11):1755-7. PMC: 4892415. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw057. View

5.
Whitlock M . Data archiving in ecology and evolution: best practices. Trends Ecol Evol. 2010; 26(2):61-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2010.11.006. View