» Articles » PMID: 31508532

Testing the Feasibility of a Guided Imagery Tobacco Cessation Intervention Delivered by a Telephone Quitline: Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Feasibility Trial

Overview
Date 2019 Sep 12
PMID 31508532
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Guided imagery (GI) is an evidence-based method that uses the imagination to practice and achieve a desired outcome. Little research has focused on how GI can be delivered to smokers using remote or virtual methods, such as a telephone-based intervention. Telephone-based services for tobacco cessation (quitlines) have emerged as standard of care for tobacco cessation. However, quitlines reach only a small fraction of smokers, and men and racial/ethnic minorities are less likely to use quitlines than majority women. GI has the potential to attract under-served minority groups as well as smokers who are looking for an alternative approach to cessation. The present study is designed to test the feasibility and potential impact of a GI tobacco cessation intervention delivered by telephone. This study compares the GI intervention with a standard behavioral (SB) intervention.

Methods: Participants (N = 100) are randomized to either the GI (intervention) or SB (control) condition. Each condition features a 6-week intervention in which participants work with coaches to quit tobacco. Primary outcomes are feasibility related (recruitment, retention, adherence), and secondary outcomes include cessation at 6 months post-intervention (7-day and 30-day abstinence).

Discussion: A GI intervention delivered via quitline would allow for scalability and dissemination, potentially reaching a more representative group of smokers. Results from this study will determine the feasibility of delivering the GI intervention, and describe the reach of the intervention to under-represented tobacco users. If successful, our study results will guide the design and conduct of a future efficacy trial.

Citing Articles

Predictors of Enrollment and Adherence in a Randomized Tobacco Cessation Clinical Trial.

Coffee Z, Hsu C, Vanderah T, Gordon J Tob Use Insights. 2024; 17:1179173X241308136.

PMID: 39678308 PMC: 11638983. DOI: 10.1177/1179173X241308136.


Testing the Efficacy of a Scalable Telephone-Delivered Guided Imagery Tobacco Cessation Treatment: Protocol for a Randomized Clinical Trial.

Gordon J, Armin J, Giacobbi Jr P, Hsu C, Marano K, Sheffer C JMIR Res Protoc. 2023; 12:e48898.

PMID: 37351932 PMC: 10337344. DOI: 10.2196/48898.


Developing a Guided Imagery Telephone-Based Tobacco Cessation Program for a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Armin J, Nair U, Giacobbi P, Povis G, Barraza Y, Gordon J Tob Use Insights. 2020; 13:1179173X20949267.

PMID: 32922107 PMC: 7446272. DOI: 10.1177/1179173X20949267.


A telephone-based guided imagery tobacco cessation intervention: results of a randomized feasibility trial.

Gordon J, Bell M, Armin J, Giacobbi P, Nair U Transl Behav Med. 2020; 11(2):516-529.

PMID: 32542352 PMC: 7963280. DOI: 10.1093/tbm/ibaa052.

References
1.
Bandura A . Social cognitive theory: an agentic perspective. Annu Rev Psychol. 2001; 52:1-26. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1. View

2.
Hopkins D, Briss P, Ricard C, Husten C, Fielding J, Alao M . Reviews of evidence regarding interventions to reduce tobacco use and exposure to environmental tobacco smoke. Am J Prev Med. 2001; 20(2 Suppl):16-66. DOI: 10.1016/s0749-3797(00)00297-x. View

3.
Severson H, Andrews J, Lichtenstein E, Gordon J, Barckley M, Akers L . A self-help cessation program for smokeless tobacco users: comparison of two interventions. Nicotine Tob Res. 2001; 2(4):363-70. DOI: 10.1080/713688152. View

4.
Molenberghs G, Thijs H, Jansen I, Beunckens C, Kenward M, Mallinckrodt C . Analyzing incomplete longitudinal clinical trial data. Biostatistics. 2004; 5(3):445-64. DOI: 10.1093/biostatistics/5.3.445. View

5.
Shiffman S, Sayette M . Validation of the nicotine dependence syndrome scale (NDSS): a criterion-group design contrasting chippers and regular smokers. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2005; 79(1):45-52. PMC: 2659852. DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2004.12.009. View