» Articles » PMID: 31506392

Potential Life-Years Lost: The Impact of the Cancer Drug Regulatory and Funding Process in Canada

Overview
Journal Oncologist
Specialty Oncology
Date 2019 Sep 12
PMID 31506392
Citations 21
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Canada has an established publicly funded health care system with a complex drug approval and funding process. After proof of efficacy (POE; key publication/presentation) and before becoming publicly accessible, each drug undergoes a Health Canada approval process, a health technology assessment (HTA), a pricing negotiation, and finally individual provincial funding agreements. We quantified potential life-years lost during this process.

Methods: We analyzed drugs for advanced lung, breast, and colorectal cancer that underwent the HTA process between 2011 and 2016. Life-years lost were calculated by multiplying documented improvement in progression-free and overall survival, number of eligible patients, and time from POE to first public funding. For conservative calculation, we assumed all eligible patients in Canada had access at the time of first public funding, whereas in reality provinces fund at different time points.

Results: We analyzed 21 drugs. Of these, 15 have been funded publicly. The time from POE to first public funding ranged from 14.0 to 99.2 months (median 26.6 months). Total overall life-years lost from POE to first public funding were 39,067 (lung 32,367; breast 6,691). Progression-free life-years lost from POE to first public funding were 48,037 (lung 9,139, breast 15,827, colorectal 23,071).

Conclusion: The number of potential life-years lost during the drug regulatory and funding process in Canada is substantial, largely driven by delays to funding of colorectal cancer drugs. Recognizing that interprovincial differences exist and that eligible patients may not all receive a given drug, if even a fraction does so, the impact of delays remains substantive. Collaborative national initiatives are required to address this major barrier to treatment access.

Implications For Practice: Patients may spend lengthy periods of time awaiting access to new and effective cancer drugs. Patients with private drug insurance or personal funds or who reside in certain Canadian provinces may obtain some drugs sooner than others, potentially creating a two-tiered access system. The cancer drug access and public funding system must be expedited to improve equity.

Citing Articles

Real-World Outcomes of Incurable Cancer Patients Treated with Unlisted Anticancer Treatments in an Academic Center in Quebec, Canada.

Miller A, Panet F, Korsos V, Miller Jr W, Batist G Curr Oncol. 2024; 31(10):5908-5918.

PMID: 39451744 PMC: 11506447. DOI: 10.3390/curroncol31100440.


Timeliness of Health Technology Assessments and Price Negotiations for Oncology Drugs in Canada.

Rawson N, Stewart D Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2024; 16:437-445.

PMID: 38812711 PMC: 11135564. DOI: 10.2147/CEOR.S462872.


The impact of proposed price regulations on new patented medicine launches in Canada: a retrospective cohort study.

Zhang W, Sun H, Guh D, Grootendorst P, Hollis A, Anis A CMAJ. 2024; 196(20):E691-E701.

PMID: 38802136 PMC: 11142024. DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.231485.


New Anticancer Drugs: Reliably Assessing "Value" While Addressing High Prices.

Stewart D, Bradford J, Sehdev S, Ramsay T, Navani V, Rawson N Curr Oncol. 2024; 31(5):2453-2480.

PMID: 38785465 PMC: 11119944. DOI: 10.3390/curroncol31050184.


Access to Oncology Medicines in Canada: Consensus Forum for Recommendations for Improvement.

Sehdev S, Rawson N, Aseyev O, Buick C, Butler M, Edwards S Curr Oncol. 2024; 31(4):1803-1816.

PMID: 38668039 PMC: 11048816. DOI: 10.3390/curroncol31040136.


References
1.
Griebsch I, Palmer M, Fayers P, Ellis S . Is progression-free survival associated with a better health-related quality of life in patients with lung cancer? Evidence from two randomised trials with afatinib. BMJ Open. 2014; 4(10):e005762. PMC: 4216861. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005762. View

2.
Miller K, Siegel R, Lin C, Mariotto A, Kramer J, Rowland J . Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2016. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016; 66(4):271-89. DOI: 10.3322/caac.21349. View

3.
Finn R, Crown J, Lang I, Boer K, Bondarenko I, Kulyk S . The cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor palbociclib in combination with letrozole versus letrozole alone as first-line treatment of oestrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative, advanced breast cancer (PALOMA-1/TRIO-18): a randomised phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol. 2014; 16(1):25-35. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)71159-3. View

4.
Sequist L, Yang J, Yamamoto N, OByrne K, Hirsh V, Mok T . Phase III study of afatinib or cisplatin plus pemetrexed in patients with metastatic lung adenocarcinoma with EGFR mutations. J Clin Oncol. 2013; 31(27):3327-34. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2012.44.2806. View

5.
Solomon B, Mok T, Kim D, Wu Y, Nakagawa K, Mekhail T . First-line crizotinib versus chemotherapy in ALK-positive lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2014; 371(23):2167-77. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1408440. View