Influence of Infant Cleft Dimensions on Velopharyngeal Function in 5-Year-Old Danish Children Born With Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate
Overview
General Surgery
Authors
Affiliations
Aim: To examine the association of cleft severity at infancy and velopharyngeal competence in preschool children with unilateral cleft lip and palate operated with early or delayed hard palate repair.
Design: Subgroup analysis within a multicenter randomized controlled trial of primary surgery (Scandcleft).
Setting: Tertiary health care. One surgical center.
Patients And Methods: One hundred twenty-five infants received cheilo-rhinoplasty and soft palate repair at age 3 to 4 months and were randomized to hard palate closure at age 12 or 36 months. Cleft size and cleft morphology were measured 3 dimensionally on digital models, obtained by laser surface scanning of preoperative plaster models (mean age: 1.8 months).
Main Outcome Measurements: Velopharyngeal competence (VPC) and hypernasality assessed from a naming test (VPC-Sum) and connected speech (VPC-Rate). In both scales, higher scores indicated a more severe velopharyngeal insufficiency.
Results: No difference between surgical groups was shown. A low positive correlation was found between posterior cleft width and VPC-Rate (Spearman = .23; = .025). The role of the covariate "cleft size at tuberosity level" was confirmed in an ordinal logistic regression model (odds ratio [OR] = 1.17; 95% confidence interval [CI]:1.01-1.35). A low negative correlation was shown between anteroposterior palatal length and VPC-Sum (Spearman = -.27; = .004) and confirmed by the pooled scores VPC-Pooled (OR = 0.82; 95% CI: 0.69-0.98) and VPC-Dichotomic (OR = 0.82; 95% CI: 0.68-0.99).
Conclusions: Posterior cleft dimensions can be a modest indicator for the prognosis of velopharyngeal function at age 5 years, when the soft palate is closed first, independently on the timing of hard palate repair. Antero-posterior palatal length seems to protect from velopharyngeal insufficiency and hypernasality. However, the association found was significant but low.
The Rate of Secondary Speech Surgery After Cleft Palate Repair: A Systematic Review.
Plonkowski A, Choi D, Naidu P, Turk M, Yao C, Magee 3rd W Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2025; 13(2):e6465.
PMID: 39995475 PMC: 11850049. DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000006465.
Karah Bash A, Ercelebi E Children (Basel). 2021; 8(12).
PMID: 34943317 PMC: 8699834. DOI: 10.3390/children8121121.
Long-term Speech Outcomes of Cleft Palate Repair in Robin Sequence versus Isolated Cleft Palate.
Logjes R, Upton S, Mendelsohn B, Badiee R, Breugem C, Hoffman W Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2021; 9(1):e3351.
PMID: 33564582 PMC: 7859383. DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000003351.