» Articles » PMID: 31502091

Morphometric Evaluation of Bone Regeneration in Segmental Mandibular Bone Defects Filled with Bovine Bone Xenografts in a Split-mouth Rabbit Model

Abstract

Background: Bovine bone grafts have been widely used in dentistry for guided tissue regeneration and can support new bone formation in direct contact with the graft. The aim of this study was to compare the morphometric and bone density changes after using two different bovine bone graft blocks in segmental osseous defects in the mandible of rabbits following different postoperative periods.

Material And Methods: Critical size segmental defects were surgically created bilaterally in the jaw of 18 rabbits. The defects were filled with either deproteinized bovine bone mineral with 10% collagen (DBBM-C; BioOss Collagen®), lyophilized bovine medullary bone (LBMB; Orthogen®), or left untreated according to a split-mouth design. Animals were sacrificed after 3 or 6 months of healing. The hemimandibles were scanned ex vivo using a high-resolution (19 μm) microcomputed tomography. Morphometric and bone density parameters were calculated in the region of the defect using CT-Analyser (Bruker). Initial graft blocks were used as baseline.

Results: DBBM-C presented a denser microarchitecture, in comparison to LBMB at baseline. DBBM-C and LBMB grafted regions showed a similar progressive remodeling, with a significant decrease in structure complexity and maintenance of bone volume fraction during the postoperative follow-up periods. Both graft materials showed an enhanced bone replacement and more complex structure compared to untreated defects. The apparent fusion between the graft and host bone was observed only in the defects filled with LBMB.

Conclusion: LBMB grafts showed a similar behavior as DBBM-C regarding structural remodeling. In LBMB samples, apparent integration between the host bone and the graft was present.

Citing Articles

Significance and considerations of establishing standardized critical values for critical size defects in animal models of bone tissue regeneration.

Wei J, Chen X, Xu Y, Shi L, Zhang M, Nie M Heliyon. 2024; 10(13):e33768.

PMID: 39071581 PMC: 11283167. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e33768.


Characterization of eggshell as a bio-regeneration material.

Opris H, Baciut M, Bran S, Dinu C, Armencea G, Opris D Med Pharm Rep. 2023; 96(1):93-100.

PMID: 36818316 PMC: 9924816. DOI: 10.15386/mpr-2476.


Effects of ultraviolet irradiation on beta-tricalcium phosphate as a bone graft substitute.

Moroi A, Takayama A, Kobayashi G, Ueki K Odontology. 2022; 110(4):682-696.

PMID: 35332382 DOI: 10.1007/s10266-022-00704-w.


Computed Tomography as a Characterization Tool for Engineered Scaffolds with Biomedical Applications.

Olaret E, Stancu I, Iovu H, Serafim A Materials (Basel). 2021; 14(22).

PMID: 34832165 PMC: 8619049. DOI: 10.3390/ma14226763.


Bone tissue engineering techniques, advances and scaffolds for treatment of bone defects.

Alonzo M, Primo F, Kumar S, Mudloff J, Dominguez E, Fregoso G Curr Opin Biomed Eng. 2021; 17.

PMID: 33718692 PMC: 7948130. DOI: 10.1016/j.cobme.2020.100248.

References
1.
Valentini P, Abensur D, Wenz B, Peetz M, Schenk R . Sinus grafting with porous bone mineral (Bio-Oss) for implant placement: a 5-year study on 15 patients. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2001; 20(3):245-53. View

2.
Tadic D, Epple M . A thorough physicochemical characterisation of 14 calcium phosphate-based bone substitution materials in comparison to natural bone. Biomaterials. 2003; 25(6):987-94. DOI: 10.1016/s0142-9612(03)00621-5. View

3.
Fabbro M, Testori T, Francetti L, Weinstein R . Systematic review of survival rates for implants placed in the grafted maxillary sinus. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2005; 24(6):565-77. View

4.
Karageorgiou V, Kaplan D . Porosity of 3D biomaterial scaffolds and osteogenesis. Biomaterials. 2005; 26(27):5474-91. DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.02.002. View

5.
Sculean A, Chiantella G, Windisch P, Arweiler N, Brecx M, Gera I . Healing of intra-bony defects following treatment with a composite bovine-derived xenograft (Bio-Oss Collagen) in combination with a collagen membrane (Bio-Gide PERIO). J Clin Periodontol. 2005; 32(7):720-4. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2005.00758.x. View