Comparison of Mix-and-Match Implanted Bifocal IOLs and Bilateral Implanted Trifocal IOLs After Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Cataract Surgery
Overview
Affiliations
Purpose: To compare the visual performance of mix-and-match implanted bifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) and bilateral implanted trifocal IOLs from the same manufacturer with the same IOL platform after femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS).
Methods: This prospective, comparative, non-randomized study included patients who underwent FLACS (LenSx; Alcon Laboratories, Inc., Fort Worth, Texas) with bilateral implantation of bifocal IOLs (ReSTOR +2.50 D/+3.00 D; Alcon Laboratories, Inc.) or trifocal IOLs (PanOptix; Alcon Laboratories, Inc.). Visual acuities, manifest refraction, defocus curve, contrast sensitivity, quality of life measured by the Visual Function Index (VF-14), and spectacle independence were assessed at 6 months after surgery.
Results: A total of 70 eyes of 35 patients were included in this study. There was no difference in patient demographics and preoperative measurements between groups (P > .05). There was no difference in uncorrected distance visual acuity and corrected distance visual acuity outcomes between groups (P > .05), but uncorrected intermediate visual acuity and uncorrected near visual acuity outcomes were significantly better in the PanOptix group (P < .01). Correspondingly, the binocular defocus curve of the PanOptix IOLs showed significantly better visual acuity between -1.00 and -3.00 diopters compared to the ReSTOR IOLs (P < .05). The PanOptix group showed higher contrast sensitivity scores than the ReSTOR group for 12 and 18 spatial frequencies in photopic conditions and for 18 spatial frequencies in mesopic conditions (P < .05). The average VF-14 score was similar between groups (P = .78). None of the patients required spectacles.
Conclusions: Bilateral implanted PanOptix IOLs seem to provide better intermediate and near vision, defocus curve, and contrast sensitivity compared to mix-and-match implanted ReSTOR IOLs. However, similar vision-related quality of life and spectacle independence were achieved with both IOLs. [J Refract Surg. 2019;35(9):559-564.].
Kabbani J, Price L, Patel R, Din N, Bizrah M BMC Ophthalmol. 2024; 24(1):397.
PMID: 39243067 PMC: 11378387. DOI: 10.1186/s12886-024-03639-8.
Stereopsis Following Implantation of Presbyopia-Correcting Intraocular Lenses: A Narrative Review.
He Y, Zhu B, Li B, Zou H, Ma Y Ophthalmol Ther. 2024; 13(9):2331-2341.
PMID: 39095681 PMC: 11341506. DOI: 10.1007/s40123-024-01004-y.
Wang D, Ma Y, Hu T, Wang Y, Cai K Medicine (Baltimore). 2024; 103(29):e38905.
PMID: 39029047 PMC: 11398791. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000038905.
Tana-Rivero P, Orts-Vila P, Aguilar-Corcoles S, Tana-Sanz P, Tana-Sanz S Clin Ophthalmol. 2023; 17:247-258.
PMID: 36698852 PMC: 9869798. DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S400136.
Moshirfar M, Stapley S, Corbin W, Bundogji N, Conley M, Darquea I J Clin Med. 2022; 11(24).
PMID: 36555990 PMC: 9781237. DOI: 10.3390/jcm11247374.