» Articles » PMID: 31496841

An Automated Mammogram Classification System Using Modified Support Vector Machine

Overview
Publisher Dove Medical Press
Date 2019 Sep 10
PMID 31496841
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Breast cancer remains a serious public health problem that results in the loss of lives among women. However, early detection of its signs increases treatment options and the likelihood of cure. Although mammography has been established to be a proven technique of examining symptoms of cancer in mammograms, the manual observation by radiologists is demanding and often prone to diagnostic errors. Therefore, computer aided diagnosis (CADx) systems could be a viable alternative that could facilitate and ease cancer diagnosis process; hence this study.

Methodology: The inputs to the proposed model are raw mammograms downloaded from the Mammographic Image Analysis Society database. Prior to the classification, the raw mammograms were preprocessed. Then, gray level co-occurrence matrix was used to extract fifteen textural features from the mammograms at four different angular directions: θ={0°, 45°, 90°, 135°}, and two distances: D={1,2}. Afterwards, a two-stage support vector machine was used to classify the mammograms as normal, benign and malignant.

Results: All of the 37 normal images used as test data were classified as normal (no false positive) and all 41 abnormal images were correctly classified to be abnormal (no false negative), meaning that the sensitivity and specificity of the model in detecting abnormality is 100%. After the detection of abnormality, the system further classified the abnormality on the mammograms to be either "benign" or "malignant". Out of 23 benign images, 21 were truly classified as benign. Also, out of 18 malignant images, 17 were truly classified to be malignant. From these findings, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the system are 94.4%, 91.3%, 89.5%, and 95.5%, respectively.

Conclusion: This article has further affirmed the prowess of automated CADx systems as a viable tool that could facilitate breast cancer diagnosis by radiologists.

Citing Articles

An updated overview of radiomics-based artificial intelligence (AI) methods in breast cancer screening and diagnosis.

Elahi R, Nazari M Radiol Phys Technol. 2024; 17(4):795-818.

PMID: 39285146 DOI: 10.1007/s12194-024-00842-6.


Usefulness of machine learning and deep learning approaches in screening and early detection of breast cancer.

Ghorbian M, Ghorbian S Heliyon. 2023; 9(12):e22427.

PMID: 38076050 PMC: 10709063. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e22427.


Application of Machine Learning for Differentiating Bone Malignancy on Imaging: A Systematic Review.

Ong W, Zhu L, Tan Y, Teo E, Tan J, Kumar N Cancers (Basel). 2023; 15(6).

PMID: 36980722 PMC: 10047175. DOI: 10.3390/cancers15061837.


Enhancement of Mammographic Images Using Histogram-Based Techniques for Their Classification Using CNN.

Alshamrani K, Alshamrani H, Alqahtani F, Almutairi B Sensors (Basel). 2023; 23(1).

PMID: 36616832 PMC: 9824687. DOI: 10.3390/s23010235.


The Systematic Review of Artificial Intelligence Applications in Breast Cancer Diagnosis.

Ozsahin D, Emegano D, Uzun B, Ozsahin I Diagnostics (Basel). 2023; 13(1).

PMID: 36611337 PMC: 9818874. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13010045.


References
1.
Elmore J, Miglioretti D, Reisch L, Barton M, Kreuter W, Christiansen C . Screening mammograms by community radiologists: variability in false-positive rates. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002; 94(18):1373-80. PMC: 3142994. DOI: 10.1093/jnci/94.18.1373. View

2.
Duijm L, Louwman M, Groenewoud J, van de Poll-Franse L, Fracheboud J, Coebergh J . Inter-observer variability in mammography screening and effect of type and number of readers on screening outcome. Br J Cancer. 2009; 100(6):901-7. PMC: 2661777. DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604954. View

3.
Moayedi F, Azimifar Z, Boostani R, Katebi S . Contourlet-based mammography mass classification using the SVM family. Comput Biol Med. 2010; 40(4):373-83. DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2009.12.006. View

4.
Dougherty G . Image analysis in medical imaging: recent advances in selected examples. Biomed Imaging Interv J. 2011; 6(3):e32. PMC: 3097774. DOI: 10.2349/biij.6.3.e32. View

5.
Mohd Khuzi A, Besar R, Wan Zaki W, Ahmad N . Identification of masses in digital mammogram using gray level co-occurrence matrices. Biomed Imaging Interv J. 2011; 5(3):e17. PMC: 3097782. DOI: 10.2349/biij.5.3.e17. View