» Articles » PMID: 31496791

Ultrasound-guided Glossopharyngeal Nerve Block Via the Styloid Process for Glossopharyngeal Neuralgia: a Retrospective Study

Overview
Journal J Pain Res
Publisher Dove Medical Press
Date 2019 Sep 10
PMID 31496791
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To examine the effectiveness and safety of ultrasound-guided glossopharyngeal nerve block via the styloid process for primary glossopharyngeal neuralgia.

Methods: This retrospective study included all patients receiving glossopharyngeal nerve block via the styloid process under ultrasound guidance for primary glossopharyngeal neuralgia between January 2015 and May 2018 at our hospital. The primary outcome of the study was pain relief as assessed using the visual analog scale (VAS). Treatment was considered effective if the VAS score decreased by more than 2 points.

Results: Twelve patients were included in the analysis. The baseline VAS scores ranged from 5 to 9. All patients received previous pharmacotherapy. Other previous treatments included pulsed mode radiofrequency (n=4), microvascular decompression (n=2), and glossopharyngeal nerve block (not under ultrasound guidance; n=2). The patients completed a total of 48 injections for glossopharyngeal nerve block. At discharge from the hospital, and at 6, 12, and 18 months thereafter, 10/12, 10/12, 7/12, and 4/12 patients achieved pain relief and the effective rate was 83.3% at discharge, 83.3% at 6 months, 58.3% at 1 year, and 33.3% at 18 months, respectively.

Conclusion: Ultrasound-guided glossopharyngeal nerve block via the styloid process is a safe, radiation-free, repeatable, convenient, and effective treatment. It can provide a treatment option for patients with glossopharyngeal neuralgia.

Citing Articles

The efficacy of ultrasound-guided pulsed radiofrequency in the treatment of primary glossopharyngeal neuralgia.

Li F, Lu H, Gong G, Ou C, Zhang Y Front Neurol. 2024; 15:1453598.

PMID: 39669105 PMC: 11634690. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1453598.


A Narrative Review on Pain Management in Head and Neck Cancer: Integrating Multimodal Analgesia and Interventional Procedures.

Imani F, Mohebbi S, Mohseni M, Karimi B, Rahimi S, Dikafraz Shokooh G Anesth Pain Med. 2024; 14(3):e146825.

PMID: 39416798 PMC: 11473993. DOI: 10.5812/aapm-146825.


Long-Term Follow-Up of Ultrasound-Guided Glossopharyngeal Nerve Block Treatment for Glossopharyngeal Neuralgia: A Retrospective Clinical Study of 43 Cases.

You S, Qin X, Tong L, Feng Z J Pain Res. 2024; 17:913-921.

PMID: 38476875 PMC: 10927459. DOI: 10.2147/JPR.S437609.


Percutaneous radiofrequency thermocoagulation and microvascular decompression for treating glossopharyngeal neuralgia: a retrospective clinical study.

Wu Z, Zhao Y, Wu F, Fan Y, Yang Y BMC Neurol. 2023; 23(1):384.

PMID: 37872489 PMC: 10591372. DOI: 10.1186/s12883-023-03415-z.


Neuropathic Pain in the Emergency Setting: Diagnosis and Management.

Doneddu P, Pensato U, Iorfida A, Alberti C, Nobile-Orazio E, Fabbri A J Clin Med. 2023; 12(18).

PMID: 37762968 PMC: 10531819. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12186028.


References
1.
Patel A, Kassam A, Horowitz M, Chang Y . Microvascular decompression in the management of glossopharyngeal neuralgia: analysis of 217 cases. Neurosurgery. 2002; 50(4):705-10; discussion 710-1. DOI: 10.1097/00006123-200204000-00004. View

2.
Moretti R, Torre P, Antonello R, Bava A, Cazzato G . Gabapentin treatment of glossopharyngeal neuralgia: a follow-up of four years of a single case. Eur J Pain. 2002; 6(5):403-7. DOI: 10.1016/s1090-3801(02)00026-5. View

3.
Cepeda M, Africano J, Polo R, Alcala R, Carr D . What decline in pain intensity is meaningful to patients with acute pain?. Pain. 2003; 105(1-2):151-7. DOI: 10.1016/s0304-3959(03)00176-3. View

4.
. The International Classification of Headache Disorders: 2nd edition. Cephalalgia. 2004; 24 Suppl 1:9-160. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2982.2003.00824.x. View

5.
Ozveren M, Ture U . The microsurgical anatomy of the glossopharyngeal nerve with respect to the jugular foramen lesions. Neurosurg Focus. 2004; 17(2):E3. DOI: 10.3171/foc.2004.17.2.3. View