» Articles » PMID: 31496639

Retrospective Analysis of an Intraoperative Aberrometry Database: a Study Investigating Absolute Prediction in Eyes Implanted with Low Cylinder Power Toric Intraocular Lenses

Overview
Journal Clin Ophthalmol
Publisher Dove Medical Press
Specialty Ophthalmology
Date 2019 Sep 10
PMID 31496639
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the spherical equivalent outcomes of intraoperative aberrometry (IA) power calculations compared with the surgeons' preoperative power calculations in eyes implanted with AcrySof IQ T3 intraocular lenses (IOLs).

Patients And Methods: We assessed data collected by an IA system from multiple centers in the United States. Data was from patients who had undergone cataract extraction by phacoemulsification with the use of the Optiwave Refractive Analysis System and whose eyes had been implanted with model SN6AT3 (1.5 diopter [D] at IOL plane) aspheric lenses. The analysis was performed in 2 stages: hypothesis generation and confirmatory testing. Confirmatory endpoints were a comparison of absolute prediction errors for IA for the implanted IOL versus preoperative formula power calculations.

Design: Retrospective analysis of preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative data concerning eyes implanted with model SN6AT3 (1.5 D) aspheric lenses from the AnalyzOR™ database.

Results: Mean absolute IA prediction error was significantly lower than preoperative prediction error (paired difference: -0.06 D; <0.0001); this was mirrored by the median paired difference of -0.04 D (<0.0001). For eyes where the power of the implanted IOL differed from the power of the preoperatively planned lens, mean and median paired differences in prediction errors were greater: -0.13 D (<0.0001) and -0.15 D (<0.0001), respectively. The percentage of eyes with prediction error ≤0.50 D was significantly higher with IA (83.4%, n=5388/6460) than with the preoperative formula (76.5%, n=4942/6460, <0.0001). When the powers of the implanted IOL and the preoperatively planned lens were different, the percentage of eyes with prediction error ≤0.50 D was 83.3% (2155/2587) for IA and 68.8% (1781/2587, <0.0001) for the preoperative formula.

Conclusion: IA produces more accurate spherical equivalent outcomes for eyes implanted with a low toric IOL than the preoperative formulas.

Citing Articles

Accuracy of intraoperative aberrometry versus preoperative biometry for intraocular lens power selection in short and long eyes.

Tana-Rivero P, Orts-Vila P, Tana-Sanz P, Tana-Sanz S, Ruiz-Mesa R, Montes-Mico R Front Med (Lausanne). 2024; 11:1466885.

PMID: 39473501 PMC: 11518733. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1466885.


A comparison of operating room toric placement tools: CALLISTO eye vs. e Wavetec AnalyzOR (CORTCO).

Scott M BMC Ophthalmol. 2024; 24(1):470.

PMID: 39468473 PMC: 11514893. DOI: 10.1186/s12886-024-03723-z.


Comparing clinical outcomes of Optiwave Refractive Analysis, Lenstar, and surgeon's modified method for intraocular lens power calculation in Asian eyes.

Lin H, Kao S, Chen S, Chuang Y, Lin P Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):14447.

PMID: 37660153 PMC: 10475043. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-41720-2.


Comparative evaluation of intraoperative aberrometry and Barrett's toric calculator in toric intraocular lens implantation.

Mukhija R, Vanathi M, Verma M, Raj N, Gupta N, Tandon R Indian J Ophthalmol. 2023; 71(5):1918-1923.

PMID: 37203056 PMC: 10391498. DOI: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_2092_22.


Refractive Outcomes Following Trifocal Intraocular Lens Implantation in Post-Myopic LASIK and PRK Eyes.

Blaylock J, Hall B Clin Ophthalmol. 2022; 16:2129-2136.

PMID: 35800671 PMC: 9255410. DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S370061.


References
1.
Olsen T . Calculation of intraocular lens power: a review. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2007; 85(5):472-85. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0420.2007.00879.x. View

2.
Ferrer-Blasco T, Montes-Mico R, Peixoto-de-Matos S, Gonzalez-Meijome J, Cervino A . Prevalence of corneal astigmatism before cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008; 35(1):70-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2008.09.027. View

3.
Khan M, Muhtaseb M . Prevalence of corneal astigmatism in patients having routine cataract surgery at a teaching hospital in the United Kingdom. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011; 37(10):1751-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2011.04.026. View

4.
Ianchulev T, Hoffer K, Yoo S, Chang D, Breen M, Padrick T . Intraoperative refractive biometry for predicting intraocular lens power calculation after prior myopic refractive surgery. Ophthalmology. 2013; 121(1):56-60. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.08.041. View

5.
Lee H, Kim T, Kim E . Corneal astigmatism analysis for toric intraocular lens implantation: precise measurements for perfect correction. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2014; 26(1):34-8. DOI: 10.1097/ICU.0000000000000119. View