» Articles » PMID: 31494820

Safety and Efficacy of Cerebrolysin in Acute Brain Injury and Neurorecovery: CAPTAIN I-a Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Double-blind, Asian-Pacific Trial

Overview
Journal Neurol Sci
Specialty Neurology
Date 2019 Sep 9
PMID 31494820
Citations 17
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of Cerebrolysin as an add-on therapy to local standard treatment protocol in patients after moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury.

Methods: The patients received the study medication in addition to standard care (50 mL of Cerebrolysin or physiological saline solution daily for 10 days, followed by two additional treatment cycles with 10 mL daily for 10 days) in a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multi-centre phase IIIb/IV trial. The primary endpoint was a multidimensional ensemble of 14 outcome scales pooled to be analyzed by means of the multivariate, correlation-sensitive Wei-Lachin procedure.

Results: In 46 enrolled TBI patients (Cerebrolysin 22, placebo 24), three single outcomes showed stand-alone statistically significant superiority of Cerebrolysin [Stroop Word/Dots Interference (p = 0.0415, Mann-Whitney(MW) = 0.6816, 95% CI 0.51-0.86); Color Trails Tests 1 and 2 (p = 0.0223/0.0170, MW = 0.72/0.73, 95% CI 0.53-0.90/0.54-0.91), both effect sizes lying above the benchmark for "large" superiority (MW > 0.71)]. While for the primary multivariate ensemble, statistical significance was just missed in the intention-to-treat population (p < 0.1, MW = 0.63, 95% CI 0.48-0.77, derived standardized mean difference (SMD) 0.45, 95% CI -0.07 to 1.04, derived OR 2.1, 95% CI 0.89-5.95), the per-protocol analysis showed a statistical significant superiority of Cerebrolysin (p = 0.0240, MW = 0.69, 95% CI 0.53 to 0.85, derived SMD 0.69, 95% CI 0.09 to 1.47, derived OR 3.2, 95% CI 1.16 to 12.8), with effect sizes of six single outcomes lying above the benchmark for "large" superiority. Safety aspects were comparable to placebo.

Conclusion: Our trial suggests beneficial effects of Cerebrolysin on outcome after TBI. Results should be confirmed by a larger RCT with a comparable multidimensional approach.

Citing Articles

Update on Neuroprotection after Traumatic Brain Injury.

Cook A, Michas M, Robbins B CNS Drugs. 2025; .

PMID: 40087248 DOI: 10.1007/s40263-025-01173-9.


Neuroprotective and neuroregenerative drugs after severe traumatic brain injury : A narrative review from a clinical perspective.

Grgac I, Herzer G, Voelckel W, Secades J, Trimmel H Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2024; 136(23-24):662-673.

PMID: 38748062 DOI: 10.1007/s00508-024-02367-9.


Comparing the biological activity and composition of Cerebrolysin with other peptide preparations.

Seidl L, Aigner L J Med Life. 2024; 17(1):24-27.

PMID: 38737662 PMC: 11080511. DOI: 10.25122/jml-2024-0129.


A retrospective study of Cerebrolysin in patients with moderate to severe traumatic brain injury: Cognitive and functional outcomes.

Soto C, Salinas P, Munoz D, Olivares S, Gonzalez J, Saez V J Med Life. 2023; 16(7):1017-1021.

PMID: 37900065 PMC: 10600656. DOI: 10.25122/jml-2023-0125.


Neuroprotective Effects of Nanowired Delivery of Cerebrolysin with Mesenchymal Stem Cells and Monoclonal Antibodies to Neuronal Nitric Oxide Synthase in Brain Pathology Following Alzheimer's Disease Exacerbated by Concussive Head Injury.

Sharma H, Muresanu D, Nozari A, Lafuente J, Buzoianu A, Tian Z Adv Neurobiol. 2023; 32:139-192.

PMID: 37480461 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-32997-5_4.


References
1.
Chen C, Wei S, Tsaia S, Chen X, Cho D . Cerebrolysin enhances cognitive recovery of mild traumatic brain injury patients: double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study. Br J Neurosurg. 2013; 27(6):803-7. DOI: 10.3109/02688697.2013.793287. View

2.
Bretz F, Koenig F, Brannath W, Glimm E, Posch M . Adaptive designs for confirmatory clinical trials. Stat Med. 2009; 28(8):1181-217. DOI: 10.1002/sim.3538. View

3.
Olesen J, Gustavsson A, Svensson M, Wittchen H, Jonsson B . The economic cost of brain disorders in Europe. Eur J Neurol. 2011; 19(1):155-62. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2011.03590.x. View

4.
Lu M, Tilley B . Use of odds ratio or relative risk to measure a treatment effect in clinical trials with multiple correlated binary outcomes: data from the NINDS t-PA stroke trial. Stat Med. 2001; 20(13):1891-901. DOI: 10.1002/sim.841. View

5.
Lee T, Chan C . Stroop interference in Chinese and English. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2000; 22(4):465-71. DOI: 10.1076/1380-3395(200008)22:4;1-0;FT465. View