» Articles » PMID: 31493848

Systematic Review and Consensus Definitions for the Standardised Endpoints in Perioperative Medicine Initiative: Patient-centred Outcomes

Overview
Journal Br J Anaesth
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Anesthesiology
Date 2019 Sep 9
PMID 31493848
Citations 64
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Patient-centred outcomes are increasingly used in perioperative clinical trials. The Standardised Endpoints in Perioperative Medicine (StEP) initiative aims to define which measures should be used in future research to facilitate comparison between studies and to enable robust evidence synthesis.

Methods: A systematic review was conducted to create a longlist of patient satisfaction, health-related quality of life, functional status, patient well-being, and life-impact measures for consideration. A three-stage Delphi consensus process involving 89 international experts was then conducted in order to refine this list into a set of recommendations.

Results: The literature review yielded six patient-satisfaction measures, seven generic health-related quality-of-life measures, eight patient well-being measures, five functional-status measures, and five life-impact measures for consideration. The Delphi response rates were 92%, 87%, and 100% for Rounds 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Three additional measures were added during the Delphi process as a result of contributions from the StEP group members. Firm recommendations have been made about one health-related quality-of-life measure (EuroQol 5 Dimension, five-level version with visual analogue scale), one functional-status measure (WHO Disability Assessment Schedule version 2.0, 12-question version), and one life-impact measure (days alive and out of hospital at 30 days after surgery). Recommendations with caveats have been made about the Bauer patient-satisfaction measure and two life-impact measures (days alive and out of hospital at 1 yr after surgery, and discharge destination).

Conclusions: Several patient-centred outcome measures have been recommended for use in future perioperative studies. We suggest that every clinical study should consider using at least one patient-centred outcome within a suite of endpoints.

Citing Articles

Relative efficacy of prehabilitation interventions and their components: systematic review with network and component network meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials.

McIsaac D, Kidd G, Gillis C, Branje K, Al-Bayati M, Baxi A BMJ. 2025; 388():e081164.

PMID: 39843215 PMC: 11752451. DOI: 10.1136/bmj-2024-081164.


Development of a Core Outcome Set of Domains to Evaluate Acute Pain Treatment After Lumbar Spine Surgery: A Modified Delphi Study.

van de Wijgert I, Vissers K, Fenten M, Rood A, van Boekel R, van Hooff M Eur J Pain. 2025; 29(2):e4784.

PMID: 39805733 PMC: 11729254. DOI: 10.1002/ejp.4784.


Intrathecal Morphine and Ropivacaine for Quality of Recovery After Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Yang Y, Lin W, Zhuo Y, Luo Y, Wu X, Li J Drug Des Devel Ther. 2024; 18():6133-6143.

PMID: 39717198 PMC: 11664109. DOI: 10.2147/DDDT.S500316.


Days at Home After Cancer Surgery: Impact of Area Deprivation and Association with Long-Term Outcomes.

Chatzipanagiotou O, Khalil M, Woldesenbet S, Catalano G, Pawlik T Ann Surg Oncol. 2024; 32(4):2393-2402.

PMID: 39699616 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-16709-4.


Effect of Continuous Erector Spinae Plane Block on Postoperative Recovery in Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery: A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.

Jin L, Yu Y, Miao P, Huang Y, Yu S, Guo K Curr Med Sci. 2024; 44(6):1103-1112.

PMID: 39673581 DOI: 10.1007/s11596-024-2593-4.