» Articles » PMID: 31493767

Chronic Non-discriminatory Social Defeat is an Effective Chronic Stress Paradigm for Both Male and Female Mice

Overview
Date 2019 Sep 8
PMID 31493767
Citations 32
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Stress-related mood disorders are more prevalent in females than males, yet preclinical chronic stress paradigms were developed in male rodents and are less effective in female rodents. Here we characterize a novel chronic non-discriminatory social defeat stress (CNSDS) paradigm that results in comparable stress effects in both sexes. Male and female C57BL/6J mice were simultaneously introduced into the home cage of resident CD-1 aggressors for 10 daily 5-min sessions. CD-1 aggressors attacked males and females indiscriminately, resulting in stress resilient and susceptible subpopulations in both sexes. CD-1 aggressors attacked C57BL/6J male intruders faster and more frequently than female intruders. However, CNSDS similarly induced negative valence behaviors in SUS mice of both sexes relative to RES and CNTRL mice. Furthermore, SUS male and female mice displayed similar increases in plasma corticosterone levels following CNSDS exposure relative to pre-stress exposure levels. The estrous cycle did not impact CD-1 attack behavior or negative valence behaviors. Thus, CNSDS induces chronic stress behavioral and neuroendocrine effects in both male and female C57BL/6J mice and allows direct comparisons between sexes. Adoption of this modified social defeat paradigm will help advance the initiative to include female rodents in preclinical chronic stress research.

Citing Articles

Heightened lateral habenula activity during stress produces brainwide and behavioral substrates of susceptibility.

Zhukovskaya A, Zimmerman C, Willmore L, Pan-Vazquez A, Janarthanan S, Lynch L Neuron. 2024; 112(23):3940-3956.e10.

PMID: 39393349 PMC: 11624084. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2024.09.009.


Neurobiology and systems biology of stress resilience.

Kalisch R, Russo S, Muller M Physiol Rev. 2024; 104(3):1205-1263.

PMID: 38483288 PMC: 11381009. DOI: 10.1152/physrev.00042.2023.


Individual Differences in Volitional Social Self-Administration and Motivation in Male and Female Mice Following Social Stress.

Navarrete J, Schneider K, Smith B, Goodwin N, Zhang Y, Salazar A Biol Psychiatry. 2024; 96(4):309-321.

PMID: 38244753 PMC: 11255129. DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2024.01.007.


Thyroid hormones mediate the impact of early-life stress on ventral tegmental area gene expression and behavior.

Bennett S, Chang A, Rogers F, Jones P, Pena C Horm Behav. 2023; 159:105472.

PMID: 38141539 PMC: 10922504. DOI: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2023.105472.


Transcriptional signatures of early-life stress and antidepressant treatment efficacy.

Parel S, Bennett S, Cheng C, Timmermans O, Fiori L, Turecki G Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023; 120(49):e2305776120.

PMID: 38011563 PMC: 10710023. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2305776120.


References
1.
David D, Samuels B, Rainer Q, Wang J, Marsteller D, Mendez I . Neurogenesis-dependent and -independent effects of fluoxetine in an animal model of anxiety/depression. Neuron. 2009; 62(4):479-93. PMC: 2759281. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2009.04.017. View

2.
Guilloux J, Seney M, Edgar N, Sibille E . Integrated behavioral z-scoring increases the sensitivity and reliability of behavioral phenotyping in mice: relevance to emotionality and sex. J Neurosci Methods. 2011; 197(1):21-31. PMC: 3086134. DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2011.01.019. View

3.
Takahashi A, Chung J, Zhang S, Zhang H, Grossman Y, Aleyasin H . Establishment of a repeated social defeat stress model in female mice. Sci Rep. 2017; 7(1):12838. PMC: 5634448. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-12811-8. View

4.
Shansky R . Sex differences in PTSD resilience and susceptibility: Challenges for animal models of fear learning. Neurobiol Stress. 2015; 1:60-65. PMC: 4340080. DOI: 10.1016/j.ynstr.2014.09.005. View

5.
Covington 3rd H, Maze I, Vialou V, Nestler E . Antidepressant action of HDAC inhibition in the prefrontal cortex. Neuroscience. 2015; 298:329-35. PMC: 4441835. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2015.04.030. View