» Articles » PMID: 31489199

Robustness of Sepsis-3 Criteria in Critically Ill Patients

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Critical Care
Date 2019 Sep 7
PMID 31489199
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Early recognition of sepsis is challenging, and diagnostic criteria have changed repeatedly. We assessed the robustness of sepsis-3 criteria in intensive care unit (ICU) patients.

Methods: We studied the apparent incidence and associated mortality of sepsis-3 among patients who were prospectively enrolled in the Molecular Diagnosis and Risk Stratification of Sepsis (MARS) cohort in the Netherlands, and explored the effects of minor variations in the precise definition and timing of diagnostic criteria for organ failure.

Results: Among 1081 patients with suspected infection upon ICU admission, 648 (60%) were considered to have sepsis according to prospective adjudication in the MARS study, whereas 976 (90%) met sepsis-3 criteria, yielding only 64% agreement at the individual patient level. Among 501 subjects developing ICU-acquired infection, these rates were 270 (54%) and 260 (52%), respectively (yielding 58% agreement). Hospital mortality was 234 (36%) vs 277 (28%) for those meeting MARS-sepsis or sepsis-3 criteria upon presentation ( < 0.001), and 121 (45%) vs 103 (40%) for those having sepsis onset in the ICU ( < 0.001). Minor variations in timing and interpretation of organ failure criteria had a considerable effect on the apparent prevalence of sepsis-3, which ranged from 68 to 96% among those with infection at admission, and from 22 to 99% among ICU-acquired cases.

Conclusion: The sepsis-3 definition lacks robustness as well as discriminatory ability, since nearly all patients presenting to ICU with suspected infection fulfill its criteria. These should therefore be specified in greater detail, and applied more consistently, during future sepsis studies.

Trial Registration: The MARS study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (identifier NCT01905033).

Citing Articles

Sepsis and delayed cerebral ischemia are associated and have a cumulative effect on poor functional outcome in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.

Centner F, Wenz H, Oster M, Dally F, Sauter-Servaes J, Pelzer T Front Neurol. 2024; 15:1393989.

PMID: 38882701 PMC: 11179438. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1393989.


Big data insights into the diagnostic values of CBC parameters for sepsis and septic shock in burn patients: a retrospective study.

Kim M, Kym D, Park J, Yoon J, Cho Y, Hur J Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):800.

PMID: 38191787 PMC: 10774327. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-50695-z.


Septic shock 3.0 criteria application in severe COVID-19 patients: An unattended sepsis population with high mortality risk.

Cidade J, Coelho L, Costa V, Morais R, Moniz P, Morais L World J Crit Care Med. 2022; 11(4):246-254.

PMID: 36051940 PMC: 9305684. DOI: 10.5492/wjccm.v11.i4.246.


Comparative Analyses of the Impact of Different Criteria for Sepsis Diagnosis on Outcome in Patients with Spontaneous Subarachnoid Hemorrhage.

Centner F, Oster M, Dally F, Sauter-Servaes J, Pelzer T, Schoettler J J Clin Med. 2022; 11(13).

PMID: 35807158 PMC: 9267349. DOI: 10.3390/jcm11133873.


Impact of different consensus definition criteria on sepsis diagnosis in a cohort of critically ill patients-Insights from a new mathematical probabilistic approach to mortality-based validation of sepsis criteria.

Centner F, Schoettler J, Fairley A, Lindner H, Schneider-Lindner V, Weiss C PLoS One. 2020; 15(9):e0238548.

PMID: 32898161 PMC: 7478755. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238548.


References
1.
Levy M, Fink M, Marshall J, Abraham E, Angus D, Cook D . 2001 SCCM/ESICM/ACCP/ATS/SIS International Sepsis Definitions Conference. Intensive Care Med. 2003; 29(4):530-8. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-003-1662-x. View

2.
Bone R, Balk R, Cerra F, Dellinger R, Fein A, Knaus W . Definitions for sepsis and organ failure and guidelines for the use of innovative therapies in sepsis. The ACCP/SCCM Consensus Conference Committee. American College of Chest Physicians/Society of Critical Care Medicine. Chest. 1992; 101(6):1644-55. DOI: 10.1378/chest.101.6.1644. View

3.
Annane D, Bellissant E, Cavaillon J . Septic shock. Lancet. 2005; 365(9453):63-78. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17667-8. View

4.
Calandra T, Cohen J . The international sepsis forum consensus conference on definitions of infection in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med. 2005; 33(7):1538-48. DOI: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000168253.91200.83. View

5.
Horan T, Andrus M, Dudeck M . CDC/NHSN surveillance definition of health care-associated infection and criteria for specific types of infections in the acute care setting. Am J Infect Control. 2008; 36(5):309-32. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajic.2008.03.002. View