» Articles » PMID: 31488166

Early Versus Late Surgery After Cervical Spinal Cord Injury: a Japanese Nationwide Trauma Database Study

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2019 Sep 7
PMID 31488166
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The management of cervical spinal cord injury (SCI) has changed drastically in the last decades, and surgery is the primary treatment. However, the optimum timing of early surgical treatment (within 24 h or 72 h after injury) is still controversial. We sought to determine the optimum timing of surgery for cervical SCI, comparing the length of the intensive care unit (ICU) stay and in-hospital mortality in patients who underwent surgical treatments (decompression and stabilization) for cervical SCI within 24 h after injury and within 7 days after injury.

Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study using Japan Trauma Data Bank (JTDB) which is a nationwide, multicenter database. We selected adult isolated cervical SCI patients who underwent operative management within 7 days after injury, between 2004 and 2015. The main outcome measures were the length of ICU stay and in-hospital mortality. We grouped the patients into two, based on the time from onset of injury to surgery, an early group (within 24 h) and a late group (from 25 h to 7 days). Next, we performed multivariable analyses for analyzing the relevance between the timing of surgery and the length of ICU stay after adjusting for baseline characteristics using propensity score. We also performed the Cox survival analyses to evaluate in-hospital mortality.

Results: From 236,698 trauma patients registered in JTDB, we analyzed 514 patients. The early group comprised 291 patients (56.6%), and the late group comprised 223 (43.4%). The length of ICU stay did not differ between the two groups (early, 10 days; late, 11 days; p = 0.29). There was no significant difference for length of ICU stay between the early and late group even after adjustment by multivariate analysis (p = 0.64). There was no significant difference in in-hospital mortality between the two groups (the early group 3.8%, the late group 2.2%, p = 0.32), and no significant difference was found in the Cox survival analysis.

Conclusions: Our study showed that neither the length of ICU stay nor in-hospital mortality after spinal column stabilization or spinal cord decompression for cervical SCI significantly differed according to the timing of surgery between 24 h and 7 days.

Citing Articles

Risk factors for postoperative DVT exacerbation or new DVT in patients with spinal cord injury complicated with cervical fracture.

Wang H, Lv B, Li W, Xu J, Ma C Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024; 11:1458941.

PMID: 39403592 PMC: 11471601. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1458941.


Tracing the evolving dynamics and research hotspots of spinal cord injury and surgical decompression from 1975 to 2024: a bibliometric analysis.

Wang S, Xu W, Wang J, Hu X, Wu Z, Li C Front Neurol. 2024; 15:1442145.

PMID: 39161868 PMC: 11330800. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1442145.


Early major fracture care in polytrauma-priorities in the context of concomitant injuries: A Delphi consensus process and systematic review.

Pfeifer R, Klingebiel F, Balogh Z, Beeres F, Coimbra R, Fang C J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2024; 97(4):639-650.

PMID: 39085995 PMC: 11446538. DOI: 10.1097/TA.0000000000004428.


Risk factors for the need for advanced care among prescription and over-the-counter drug overdose patients.

Tanaka C, Tagami T, Nagano M, Nakayama F, Kaneko J, Kuno M Acute Med Surg. 2024; 11(1):e942.

PMID: 38500638 PMC: 10946162. DOI: 10.1002/ams2.942.


Application of Modest Hypothermia in Patients with Acute Traumatic Cervical Spine Injury: A Pilot Study.

Suresh P, Dhatt S, Kumar V, Salaria A, Neradi D, Samra T Spine Surg Relat Res. 2022; 6(5):453-459.

PMID: 36348686 PMC: 9605763. DOI: 10.22603/ssrr.2021-0137.


References
1.
Li Y, Walker C, Zhang Y, Shields C, Xu X . Surgical decompression in acute spinal cord injury: A review of clinical evidence, animal model studies, and potential future directions of investigation. Front Biol (Beijing). 2014; 9(2):127-136. PMC: 4041293. DOI: 10.1007/s11515-014-1297-z. View

2.
Janssen K, Donders A, Harrell Jr F, Vergouwe Y, Chen Q, Grobbee D . Missing covariate data in medical research: to impute is better than to ignore. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010; 63(7):721-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.12.008. View

3.
Umerani M, Abbas A, Sharif S . Clinical Outcome in Patients with Early versus Delayed Decompression in Cervical Spine Trauma. Asian Spine J. 2014; 8(4):427-34. PMC: 4149985. DOI: 10.4184/asj.2014.8.4.427. View

4.
Biglari B, Child C, Yildirim T, Swing T, Reitzel T, Moghaddam A . Does surgical treatment within 4 hours after trauma have an influence on neurological remission in patients with acute spinal cord injury?. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2016; 12:1339-46. PMC: 5012849. DOI: 10.2147/TCRM.S108856. View

5.
Papadopoulos S, Selden N, Quint D, Patel N, Gillespie B, Grube S . Immediate spinal cord decompression for cervical spinal cord injury: feasibility and outcome. J Trauma. 2002; 52(2):323-32. DOI: 10.1097/00005373-200202000-00019. View