» Articles » PMID: 31486057

Interactive NLP in Clinical Care: Identifying Incidental Findings in Radiology Reports

Overview
Publisher Thieme
Date 2019 Sep 6
PMID 31486057
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Despite advances in natural language processing (NLP), extracting information from clinical text is expensive. Interactive tools that are capable of easing the construction, review, and revision of NLP models can reduce this cost and improve the utility of clinical reports for clinical and secondary use.

Objectives: We present the design and implementation of an interactive NLP tool for identifying incidental findings in radiology reports, along with a user study evaluating the performance and usability of the tool.

Methods: Expert reviewers provided gold standard annotations for 130 patient encounters (694 reports) at sentence, section, and report levels. We performed a user study with 15 physicians to evaluate the accuracy and usability of our tool. Participants reviewed encounters split into intervention (with predictions) and control conditions (no predictions). We measured changes in model performance, the time spent, and the number of user actions needed. The System Usability Scale (SUS) and an open-ended questionnaire were used to assess usability.

Results: Starting from bootstrapped models trained on 6 patient encounters, we observed an average increase in F1 score from 0.31 to 0.75 for reports, from 0.32 to 0.68 for sections, and from 0.22 to 0.60 for sentences on a held-out test data set, over an hour-long study session. We found that tool helped significantly reduce the time spent in reviewing encounters (134.30 vs. 148.44 seconds in intervention and control, respectively), while maintaining overall quality of labels as measured against the gold standard. The tool was well received by the study participants with a very good overall SUS score of 78.67.

Conclusion: The user study demonstrated successful use of the tool by physicians for identifying incidental findings. These results support the viability of adopting interactive NLP tools in clinical care settings for a wider range of clinical applications.

Citing Articles

Natural Language Processing and Graph Theory: Making Sense of Imaging Records in a Novel Representation Frame.

Binsfeld Goncalves L, Nesic I, Obradovic M, Stieltjes B, Weikert T, Bremerich J JMIR Med Inform. 2022; 10(12):e40534.

PMID: 36542426 PMC: 9813822. DOI: 10.2196/40534.


Natural Language Processing Model for Identifying Critical Findings-A Multi-Institutional Study.

Banerjee I, Davis M, Vey B, Mazaheri S, Khan F, Zavaletta V J Digit Imaging. 2022; 36(1):105-113.

PMID: 36344632 PMC: 9984612. DOI: 10.1007/s10278-022-00712-w.


System-driven longitudinal follow-up of incidental imaging findings.

Fu T, Plecha D, Sommer J Br J Radiol. 2022; 96(1142):20220573.

PMID: 36063362 PMC: 9975520. DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20220573.


Inclusion of Clinicians in the Development and Evaluation of Clinical Artificial Intelligence Tools: A Systematic Literature Review.

Tulk Jesso S, Kelliher A, Sanghavi H, Martin T, Parker S Front Psychol. 2022; 13:830345.

PMID: 35465567 PMC: 9022040. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.830345.


Overview of Noninterpretive Artificial Intelligence Models for Safety, Quality, Workflow, and Education Applications in Radiology Practice.

Tadavarthi Y, Makeeva V, Wagstaff W, Zhan H, Podlasek A, Bhatia N Radiol Artif Intell. 2022; 4(2):e210114.

PMID: 35391770 PMC: 8980942. DOI: 10.1148/ryai.210114.


References
1.
Malmasi S, Sandor N, Hosomura N, Goldberg M, Skentzos S, Turchin A . Canary: An NLP Platform for Clinicians and Researchers. Appl Clin Inform. 2017; 8(2):447-453. PMC: 6241741. DOI: 10.4338/ACI-2017-01-IE-0018. View

2.
Heimerl F, Koch S, Bosch H, Ertl T . Visual Classifier Training for Text Document Retrieval. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph. 2015; 18(12):2839-48. DOI: 10.1109/TVCG.2012.277. View

3.
Chapman W, Nadkarni P, Hirschman L, DAvolio L, Savova G, Uzuner O . Overcoming barriers to NLP for clinical text: the role of shared tasks and the need for additional creative solutions. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011; 18(5):540-3. PMC: 3168329. DOI: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000465. View

4.
Chapman W, Bridewell W, Hanbury P, Cooper G, Buchanan B . A simple algorithm for identifying negated findings and diseases in discharge summaries. J Biomed Inform. 2002; 34(5):301-10. DOI: 10.1006/jbin.2001.1029. View

5.
Heer J . Agency plus automation: Designing artificial intelligence into interactive systems. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019; 116(6):1844-1850. PMC: 6369770. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1807184115. View