» Articles » PMID: 31483119

Validation of the New Classification Criteria for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus on a Patient Cohort from a National Referral Center: a Retrospective Study

Overview
Journal Croat Med J
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2019 Sep 5
PMID 31483119
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aim: To validate Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC)-12 and American College of Rheumatology (ACR)-97 classification criteria on a patient cohort from the University Hospital Center Zagreb.

Methods: This retrospective study, conducted from 2014 to 2016, involved 308 patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) (n=146) and SLE-allied conditions (n=162). Patients' medical charts were evaluated by an expert rheumatologist to confirm the clinical diagnosis, regardless of the number of the ACR-97 criteria met. Overall sensitivity and specificity, as well as the sensitivity and specificity according to disease duration, were compared between ACR-97 and SLICC-12 classifications. Predictive value for SLE for both classifications was assessed using logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.

Results: The SLICC-12 criteria had significantly higher sensitivity in early disase, which increased with disease duration. The ACR-97 criteria had higher specificity. The specificity of the SLICC-12 criteria was low and decreased with disease duration. Regression analysis demonstrated the superiority of the SLICC-12 classification criteria over the ACR-97 criteria, with areas under the ROC curve of 0.801 and 0.780, respectively.

Conclusion: Although the SLICC-12 criteria were superior to the ACR-97 and were more sensitive for diagnosing early SLE, their specificity in our population was too low. The sensitivity of the SLICC-12 classification is increased by better defined clinical features within each criterion. Our results contribute to the current initiative for developing new criteria for SLE.

Citing Articles

Diagnostic Dilemma of ANA-negative Pediatric Systemic Lupus Erythematosus in a South Asian Female.

Khan Q, Khan T, Abdi P, Farkouh C, Anthony M, Hadi F Clin Med Insights Case Rep. 2023; 16:11795476231174321.

PMID: 37205006 PMC: 10186573. DOI: 10.1177/11795476231174321.


Evaluating performance of the 2019 EULAR/ACR, 2012 SLICC, and 1997 ACR criteria for classifying adult-onset and childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Lerkvaleekul B, Chobchai P, Rattanasiri S, Vilaiyuk S Front Med (Lausanne). 2023; 9:1093213.

PMID: 36619627 PMC: 9813386. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.1093213.

References
1.
Costenbader K, Karlson E, Mandl L . Defining lupus cases for clinical studies: the Boston weighted criteria for the classification of systemic lupus erythematosus. J Rheumatol. 2002; 29(12):2545-50. View

2.
Sanchez M, Alarcon G, McGwin Jr G, Fessler B, Kimberly R . Can the weighted criteria improve our ability to capture a larger number of lupus patients into observational and interventional studies? A comparison with the American College of Rheumatology criteria. Lupus. 2003; 12(6):468-70. DOI: 10.1191/0961203303lu369oa. View

3.
Petri M . Review of classification criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2005; 31(2):245-54, vi. DOI: 10.1016/j.rdc.2005.01.009. View

4.
Singh J, Solomon D, Dougados M, Felson D, Hawker G, Katz P . Development of classification and response criteria for rheumatic diseases. Arthritis Rheum. 2006; 55(3):348-52. DOI: 10.1002/art.22003. View

5.
Cerovec M, Anic B, Padjen I, Cikes N . Prevalence of the American College of Rheumatology classification criteria in a group of 162 systemic lupus erythematosus patients from Croatia. Croat Med J. 2012; 53(2):149-54. PMC: 3342646. DOI: 10.3325/cmj.2012.53.149. View