» Articles » PMID: 31482476

Identification of the Clinically Most Relevant Postoperative Complications After Gastrectomy: a Population-based Cohort Study

Overview
Journal Gastric Cancer
Date 2019 Sep 5
PMID 31482476
Citations 17
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Postoperative complications frequently occur after gastrectomy for gastric cancer and are associated with poor clinical outcomes, such as mortality and reoperations. The aim of study was to identify the clinically most relevant complications after gastrectomy, using the population-attributable fraction (PAF).

Methods: Between 2011 and 2017, all patients who underwent potentially curative gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma were included from the Dutch Upper GI Cancer Audit. Postoperative outcomes (morbidity, mortality, recovery and hospitalization) were evaluated. The prevalence of postoperative complications (e.g., anastomotic leakage and pneumonia) and of the study outcomes were calculated. The adjusted relative risk and Confidence Interval (CI) for each complication-outcome pair were calculated. Subsequently, the PAF was calculated, which represents the percentage of a given outcome occurring in the population, caused by individual complications, taking both the relative risk and the frequency in which a complication occurs into account.

Results: In total, 2176 patients were analyzed. Anastomotic leakage and pulmonary complications had the greatest overall impact on postoperative mortality (PAF 29.2% [95% CI 19.3-39.1] and 21.6% [95% CI 10.5-32.7], respectively) and prolonged hospitalization (PAF 12.9% [95% CI 9.7-16.0] and 14.7% [95% CI 11.0-18.8], respectively). Anastomotic leakage had the greatest overall impact on re-interventions (PAF 25.1% [95% CI 20.5-29.7]) and reoperations (PAF 30.3% [95% CI 24.3-36.3]). Intra-abdominal abscesses had the largest impact on readmissions (PAF 7.0% [95% CI 3.2-10.9]). Other complications only had a small effect on these outcomes.

Conclusion: Surgical improvement programs should focus on preventing or managing anastomotic leakage and pulmonary complications, since these complications have the greatest overall impact on clinical outcomes after gastrectomy.

Citing Articles

A retrospective study of provisional outcomes of intracorporeal esophagojejunostomy versus extracorporeal anastomosis during laparoscopic total gastrectomy for gastric cancer. a single -center.

Diallo M, Shuai Z, Chen B, Yu Y, Yan Z, Sun Q World J Surg Oncol. 2024; 22(1):324.

PMID: 39627814 PMC: 11613794. DOI: 10.1186/s12957-024-03548-6.


Risk factor analysis and establishment of a predictive model for complications of elderly advanced gastric cancer with Clavien-Dindo classification ≥ II grade.

Liu Z, Ma W, Zhang J, Liu S, Duan X, Wang Z BMC Cancer. 2024; 24(1):1185.

PMID: 39333976 PMC: 11437802. DOI: 10.1186/s12885-024-12965-5.


Outcomes after gastrectomy according to the Gastrectomy Complications Consensus Group (GCCG) in the Dutch Upper GI Cancer Audit (DUCA).

Visser M, Voeten D, Gisbertz S, Ruurda J, van Berge Henegouwen M, van Hillegersberg R Gastric Cancer. 2024; 27(5):1124-1135.

PMID: 38943030 PMC: 11335793. DOI: 10.1007/s10120-024-01527-0.


Totally laparoscopic versus laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy: the KLASS-07: a randomized controlled trial.

Park S, Lee C, Hur H, Min J, Ryu S, Son Y Int J Surg. 2024; 110(8):4810-4820.

PMID: 38716987 PMC: 11325945. DOI: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000001543.


Impact of FDG-PET/CT and Laparoscopy in Staging of Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Cost Analysis in the Prospective Multicenter PLASTIC-Study.

de Jongh C, van der Meulen M, Gertsen E, Brenkman H, van Sandick J, van Berge Henegouwen M Ann Surg Oncol. 2024; 31(6):4005-4017.

PMID: 38526832 PMC: 11076388. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-15103-4.


References
1.
Busweiler L, Wijnhoven B, van Berge Henegouwen M, Henneman D, van Grieken N, Wouters M . Early outcomes from the Dutch Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Audit. Br J Surg. 2016; 103(13):1855-1863. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.10303. View

2.
Brenkman H, Gisbertz S, Slaman A, Goense L, Ruurda J, van Berge Henegouwen M . Postoperative Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Gastrectomy Versus Open Gastrectomy During the Early Introduction of Minimally Invasive Gastrectomy in the Netherlands: A Population-based Cohort Study. Ann Surg. 2017; 266(5):831-838. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002391. View

3.
Chen K, Zhai S, Pan J, Yu W, Pan Y, Chen Q . Short-term outcomes of laparoscopic total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a comparative study with laparoscopic distal gastrectomy at a high-volume center. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2017; 27(3):164-170. DOI: 10.1080/13645706.2017.1350718. View

4.
Hu Y, Huang C, Sun Y, Su X, Cao H, Hu J . Morbidity and Mortality of Laparoscopic Versus Open D2 Distal Gastrectomy for Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2016; 34(12):1350-7. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2015.63.7215. View

5.
Honda M, Kumamaru H, Etoh T, Miyata H, Yamashita Y, Yoshida K . Surgical risk and benefits of laparoscopic surgery for elderly patients with gastric cancer: a multicenter prospective cohort study. Gastric Cancer. 2018; 22(4):845-852. DOI: 10.1007/s10120-018-0898-7. View