» Articles » PMID: 31481882

Encoding and Perception of Electro-communication Signals in

Overview
Date 2019 Sep 5
PMID 31481882
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Animal communication plays an essential role in triggering diverse behaviors. It is believed in this regard that signal production by a sender and its perception by a receiver is co-evolving in order to have beneficial effects such as to ensure that conspecifics remain sensitive to these signals. However, in order to give appropriate responses to a communication signal, the receiver has to first detect and interpret it in a meaningful way. The detection of communication signals can be limited under some circumstances, for example when the signal is masked by the background noise in which it occurs (e.g., the cocktail-party problem). Moreover, some signals are very alike despite having different meanings making it hard to discriminate between them. How the central nervous system copes with these tasks and problems is a central question in systems neuroscience. Gymnotiform weakly electric fish pose an interesting system to answer these questions for various reasons: (1) they use a variety of communication signals called "chirps" during different behavioral encounters; (2) the central physiology of the electrosensory system is well known; and (3) most importantly, these fish give reliable behavioral responses to artificial stimuli that resemble natural communication signals, making it possible to uncover the neural mechanisms that lead to the observed behaviors.

Citing Articles

A perspective on neuroethology: what the past teaches us about the future of neuroethology.

Beetz M J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2024; 210(2):325-346.

PMID: 38411712 PMC: 10995053. DOI: 10.1007/s00359-024-01695-5.


Vocal and Electric Fish: Revisiting a Comparison of Two Teleost Models in the Neuroethology of Social Behavior.

Dunlap K, Koukos H, Chagnaud B, Zakon H, Bass A Front Neural Circuits. 2021; 15:713105.

PMID: 34489647 PMC: 8418312. DOI: 10.3389/fncir.2021.713105.


Synergistic population coding of natural communication stimuli by hindbrain electrosensory neurons.

Wang Z, Chacron M Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1):10840.

PMID: 34035395 PMC: 8149419. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-90413-1.


Population Coding of Natural Electrosensory Stimuli by Midbrain Neurons.

Metzen M, Chacron M J Neurosci. 2021; 41(17):3822-3841.

PMID: 33687962 PMC: 8084312. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2232-20.2021.


Spooky Interaction at a Distance in Cave and Surface Dwelling Electric Fishes.

Fortune E, Andanar N, Madhav M, Jayakumar R, Cowan N, Bichuette M Front Integr Neurosci. 2020; 14:561524.

PMID: 33192352 PMC: 7642693. DOI: 10.3389/fnint.2020.561524.


References
1.
Bastian J, Nguyenkim J . Dendritic modulation of burst-like firing in sensory neurons. J Neurophysiol. 2001; 85(1):10-22. DOI: 10.1152/jn.2001.85.1.10. View

2.
MacIver M, Sharabash N, Nelson M . Prey-capture behavior in gymnotid electric fish: motion analysis and effects of water conductivity. J Exp Biol. 2001; 204(Pt 3):543-57. DOI: 10.1242/jeb.204.3.543. View

3.
Bastian J, Schniederjan S, Nguyenkim J . Arginine vasotocin modulates a sexually dimorphic communication behavior in the weakly electric fish Apteronotus leptorhynchus. J Exp Biol. 2001; 204(Pt 11):1909-23. DOI: 10.1242/jeb.204.11.1909. View

4.
Engler G, Zupanc G . Differential production of chirping behavior evoked by electrical stimulation of the weakly electric fish, Apteronotus leptorhynchus. J Comp Physiol A. 2002; 187(9):747-56. DOI: 10.1007/s00359-001-0248-8. View

5.
Bastian J, Chacron M, Maler L . Receptive field organization determines pyramidal cell stimulus-encoding capability and spatial stimulus selectivity. J Neurosci. 2002; 22(11):4577-90. PMC: 6758818. DOI: 20026423. View