» Articles » PMID: 31477803

Accelerated Inbreeding Depression Suggests Synergistic Epistasis for Deleterious Mutations in Drosophila Melanogaster

Overview
Specialty Genetics
Date 2019 Sep 4
PMID 31477803
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Epistasis may have important consequences for a number of issues in quantitative genetics and evolutionary biology. In particular, synergistic epistasis for deleterious alleles is relevant to the mutation load paradox and the evolution of sex and recombination. Some studies have shown evidence of synergistic epistasis for spontaneous or induced deleterious mutations appearing in mutation-accumulation experiments. However, many newly arising mutations may not actually be segregating in natural populations because of the erasing action of natural selection. A demonstration of synergistic epistasis for naturally segregating alleles can be achieved by means of inbreeding depression studies, as deleterious recessive allelic effects are exposed in inbred lines. Nevertheless, evidence of epistasis from these studies is scarce and controversial. In this paper, we report the results of two independent inbreeding experiments carried out with two different populations of Drosophila melanogaster. The results show a consistent accelerated inbreeding depression for fitness, suggesting synergistic epistasis among deleterious alleles. We also performed computer simulations assuming different possible models of epistasis and mutational parameters for fitness, finding some of them to be compatible with the results observed. Our results suggest that synergistic epistasis for deleterious mutations not only occurs among newly arisen spontaneous or induced mutations, but also among segregating alleles in natural populations.

Citing Articles

Genetic linkage disequilibrium of deleterious mutations in threatened mammals.

Hu C, Liu G, Zhang Z, Pan Q, Zhang X, Liu W EMBO Rep. 2024; 25(12):5620-5634.

PMID: 39487369 PMC: 11624202. DOI: 10.1038/s44319-024-00307-2.


Multiple intermolecular interactions facilitate rapid evolution of essential genes.

Lai H, Yu Y, Jhou Y, Liao C, Leu J Nat Ecol Evol. 2023; 7(5):745-755.

PMID: 36997737 PMC: 10172115. DOI: 10.1038/s41559-023-02029-5.


Inferring Epistasis from Genetic Time-series Data.

Sohail M, Louie R, Hong Z, Barton J, McKay M Mol Biol Evol. 2022; 39(10).

PMID: 36130322 PMC: 9558069. DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msac199.


How much does the unguarded X contribute to sex differences in life span?.

Connallon T, Beasley I, McDonough Y, Ruzicka F Evol Lett. 2022; 6(4):319-329.

PMID: 35937469 PMC: 9346086. DOI: 10.1002/evl3.292.


The advantage of sex: Reinserting fluctuating selection in the pluralist approach.

Pierre J, Stoeckel S, Wajnberg E PLoS One. 2022; 17(8):e0272134.

PMID: 35917359 PMC: 9345338. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272134.


References
1.
Roze D, Lenormand T . Self-fertilization and the evolution of recombination. Genetics. 2005; 170(2):841-57. PMC: 1450426. DOI: 10.1534/genetics.104.036384. View

2.
Kelly J . Epistasis in monkeyflowers. Genetics. 2005; 171(4):1917-31. PMC: 1456113. DOI: 10.1534/genetics.105.041525. View

3.
Hemani G, Knott S, Haley C . An evolutionary perspective on epistasis and the missing heritability. PLoS Genet. 2013; 9(2):e1003295. PMC: 3585114. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003295. View

4.
Kouyos R, Silander O, Bonhoeffer S . Epistasis between deleterious mutations and the evolution of recombination. Trends Ecol Evol. 2007; 22(6):308-15. DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2007.02.014. View

5.
Simmons M, Crow J . Mutations affecting fitness in Drosophila populations. Annu Rev Genet. 1977; 11:49-78. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.ge.11.120177.000405. View