» Articles » PMID: 31475177

Deep Convolutional Neural Network Inception-v3 Model for Differential Diagnosing of Lymph Node in Cytological Images: a Pilot Study

Overview
Journal Ann Transl Med
Date 2019 Sep 3
PMID 31475177
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: In this study, we exploited the Inception-v3 deep convolutional neural network (DCNN) model to differentiate cervical lymphadenopathy using cytological images.

Methods: A dataset of 80 cases was collected through the fine-needle aspiration (FNA) of enlarged cervical lymph nodes, which consisted of 20 cases of reactive lymphoid hyperplasia, 24 cases of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL), 16 cases of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), and 20 cases of adenocarcinoma. The images were cropped into fragmented images and divided into a training dataset and a test dataset. Inception-v3 was trained to make differential diagnoses and then tested. The features of misdiagnosed images were further analysed to discover the features that may influence the diagnostic efficiency of such a DCNN.

Results: A total of 742 original images were derived from the cases, from which a total of 7,934 fragmented images were cropped. The classification accuracies for the original images of reactive lymphoid hyperplasia, NHL, SCC and adenocarcinoma were 88.46%, 80.77%, 89.29% and 100%, respectively. The total accuracy on the test dataset was 89.62%. Three fragmented images of reactive lymphoid hyperplasia and three fragmented images of SCC were misclassified as NHL. Three fragmented images of NHL were misclassified as reactive lymphoid hyperplasia, one was misclassified as SCC, and one was misclassified as adenocarcinoma.

Conclusions: In summary, after training with a large dataset, the Inception-v3 DCNN model showed great potential in facilitating the diagnosis of cervical lymphadenopathy using cytological images. Analysis of the misdiagnosed cases revealed that NHL was the most challenging cytology type for DCNN to differentiate.

Citing Articles

Artificial Intelligence in Temporomandibular Joint Disorders: An Umbrella Review.

Mehta V, Tripathy S, Noor T, Mathur A Clin Exp Dent Res. 2025; 11(1):e70115.

PMID: 40066511 PMC: 11894261. DOI: 10.1002/cre2.70115.


Development of an Artificial-Intelligence-Based Tool for Automated Assessment of Cellularity in Bone Marrow Biopsies in Ph-Negative Myeloproliferative Neoplasms.

DAbbronzo G, DAntonio A, De Chiara A, Panico L, Sparano L, Diluvio A Cancers (Basel). 2024; 16(9).

PMID: 38730640 PMC: 11083301. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16091687.


An Update on the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Digital Pathology for Oral Epithelial Dysplasia Research.

Alajaji S, Khoury Z, Jessri M, Sciubba J, Sultan A Head Neck Pathol. 2024; 18(1):38.

PMID: 38727841 PMC: 11087425. DOI: 10.1007/s12105-024-01643-4.


RobOCTNet: Robotics and Deep Learning for Referable Posterior Segment Pathology Detection in an Emergency Department Population.

Song A, Lusk J, Roh K, Hsu S, Valikodath N, Lad E Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2024; 13(3):12.

PMID: 38488431 PMC: 10946693. DOI: 10.1167/tvst.13.3.12.


Artificial intelligence performance in detecting lymphoma from medical imaging: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Bai A, Si M, Xue P, Qu Y, Jiang Y BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024; 24(1):13.

PMID: 38191361 PMC: 10775443. DOI: 10.1186/s12911-023-02397-9.


References
1.
Landgren O, Porwit MacDonald A, Tani E, Czader M, Grimfors G, Skoog L . A prospective comparison of fine-needle aspiration cytology and histopathology in the diagnosis and classification of lymphomas. Hematol J. 2004; 5(1):69-76. DOI: 10.1038/sj.thj.6200316. View

2.
Kocjan G . Best Practice No 185. Cytological and molecular diagnosis of lymphoma. J Clin Pathol. 2005; 58(6):561-7. PMC: 1770685. DOI: 10.1136/jcp.2004.019133. View

3.
Ciatto S, Brancato B, Risso G, Ambrogetti D, Bulgaresi P, Maddau C . Accuracy of fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) of axillary lymph nodes as a triage test in breast cancer staging. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2006; 103(1):85-91. DOI: 10.1007/s10549-006-9355-0. View

4.
Teramoto A, Tsukamoto T, Kiriyama Y, Fujita H . Automated Classification of Lung Cancer Types from Cytological Images Using Deep Convolutional Neural Networks. Biomed Res Int. 2017; 2017:4067832. PMC: 5572620. DOI: 10.1155/2017/4067832. View

5.
Momeni-Boroujeni A, Yousefi E, Somma J . Computer-assisted cytologic diagnosis in pancreatic FNA: An application of neural networks to image analysis. Cancer Cytopathol. 2017; 125(12):926-933. DOI: 10.1002/cncy.21915. View