» Articles » PMID: 31474789

Complications of Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Transmural Drainage of Pancreatic Fluid Collections and Their Management

Overview
Specialty Gastroenterology
Date 2019 Sep 3
PMID 31474789
Citations 18
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The development of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided drainage techniques and lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS) has markedly reduced the complication rate of endoscopic transmural drainage of pancreatic collections and made these procedures safer and more effective. Despite its improved safety profile, various types of complications, some even life-threatening, can occur after EUS-guided drainage of pancreatic fluid collections. Stent maldeployment/migration, bleeding, gastrointestinal perforation, and air embolism are important complications of EUS-guided drainage of pancreatic collections. Delayed complications weeks after the procedure, such as bleeding and buried LAMS due to the presence of prolonged indwelling transmural stents, have also been described. Careful patient selection, with proper assessment of the size, solid necrotic content and location of the collection, as well as an in-depth understanding of various risk factors that predict complications, are important for a safer and more effective endoscopic transmural drainage. For a better clinical outcome, it is important for the endoscopist to know about various complications of EUS-guided drainage of pancreatic collections, as well as their appropriate management strategies.

Citing Articles

Analysis of Adverse Events of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Lumen-Apposing Metal Stent Placement: Insights Across Various Indications and Techniques.

Abusuliman M, Jamali T, Nimri F, Chaudhary A, Elfert K, Saleem A Gastroenterology Res. 2025; 18(1):1-11.

PMID: 40051887 PMC: 11882228. DOI: 10.14740/gr1793.


Recurrent gastric intramural pseudocyst: A case report and comprehensive literature review of reported cases.

Soltani A, Salimi M, Nemati M, Mirshamsi A Radiol Case Rep. 2024; 19(11):5429-5441.

PMID: 39285981 PMC: 11403908. DOI: 10.1016/j.radcr.2024.08.041.


Association between acute peripancreatic fluid collections and early readmission in acute pancreatitis: A propensity-matched analysis.

Ali H, Inayat F, Rasheed W, Afzal A, Chaudhry A, Patel P World J Exp Med. 2024; 14(2):92052.

PMID: 38948418 PMC: 11212740. DOI: 10.5493/wjem.v14.i2.92052.


Endoscopic ultrasound-guided pancreatic fluid collection drainage: Where are we?.

Singh A, Manrai M, Kochhar R World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2024; 16(6):273-281.

PMID: 38946852 PMC: 11212513. DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v16.i6.273.


Infected pancreatic necrosis-Current trends in management.

Shah J, Fernandez Y Viesca M, Jagodzinski R, Arvanitakis M Indian J Gastroenterol. 2024; 43(3):578-591.

PMID: 38625518 DOI: 10.1007/s12664-023-01506-w.


References
1.
Varadarajulu S . EUS-guided retrieval of a migrated transgastric pancreatic stent. Endoscopy. 2007; 39 Suppl 1:E18-9. DOI: 10.1055/s-2006-944916. View

2.
Varadarajulu S, Christein J, Tamhane A, Drelichman E, Wilcox C . Prospective randomized trial comparing EUS and EGD for transmural drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc. 2008; 68(6):1102-11. DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.04.028. View

3.
Seifert H, Biermer M, Schmitt W, Jurgensen C, Will U, Gerlach R . Transluminal endoscopic necrosectomy after acute pancreatitis: a multicentre study with long-term follow-up (the GEPARD Study). Gut. 2009; 58(9):1260-6. DOI: 10.1136/gut.2008.163733. View

4.
van Santvoort H, Besselink M, Bakker O, Hofker H, Boermeester M, Dejong C . A step-up approach or open necrosectomy for necrotizing pancreatitis. N Engl J Med. 2010; 362(16):1491-502. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa0908821. View

5.
Varadarajulu S, Christein J, Wilcox C . Frequency of complications during EUS-guided drainage of pancreatic fluid collections in 148 consecutive patients. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011; 26(10):1504-8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2011.06771.x. View