» Articles » PMID: 31473793

A Bone Resorption Marker As Predictor of Rate of Change in Femoral Neck Size and Strength During the Menopause Transition

Overview
Journal Osteoporos Int
Date 2019 Sep 2
PMID 31473793
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Composite indices of the femoral neck's ability to withstand compressive (compression strength index, CSI) and impact (impact strength index, ISI) forces integrate DXA-derived femoral neck width (FNW), bone mineral density (BMD), and body size. During the menopause transition (MT), FNW increases, and CSI and ISI decrease. This proof-of-concept study assessed whether a bone resorption marker, measured early in the MT, is associated with rates of change in FNW, CSI and ISI during the MT.

Methods: We used previously collected bone resorption marker (urine collagen type I N-telopeptide [U-NTX]) and femoral neck strength data from 696 participants from the Study of Women's Health Across the Nation (SWAN), a longitudinal study of the MT in a multi-ethnic cohort of community-dwelling women.

Results: Adjusted for MT stage (pre- vs. early perimenopause), age, body mass index (BMI), bone resorption marker collection time, and study site in multivariable linear regression, bone resorption in pre- and early perimenopause was not associated with transmenopausal decline rate in femoral neck BMD. However, each standard deviation (SD) increase in bone resorption level was associated with 0.2% per year slower increase in FNW (p = 0.03), and 0.3% per year faster declines in CSI (p = 0.02) and ISI (p = 0.01). When restricted to women in early perimenopause, the associations of bone resorption with change in FNW, CSI, and ISI were similar to those in the full sample.

Conclusions: Measuring a bone resorption marker in pre- and early perimenopause may identify women who will experience the greatest loss in bone strength during the MT.

Citing Articles

Bioinspired core-shell nanofiber drug-delivery system modulates osteogenic and osteoclast activity for bone tissue regeneration.

Anjum S, Wang Y, Xin Y, Li X, Li T, Zhang H Mater Today Bio. 2024; 26:101088.

PMID: 38779556 PMC: 11109009. DOI: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2024.101088.


Association between Musculoskeletal Pain and Bone Turnover Markers in Long-Term Pb-Exposed Workers.

Kalahasthi R, Bagepally B, Barman T J Res Health Sci. 2021; 21(3):e00522.

PMID: 34698656 PMC: 8957687. DOI: 10.34172/jrhs.2021.55.


The Association between Fast Increase in Bone Turnover During the Menopause Transition and Subsequent Fracture.

Shieh A, Greendale G, Cauley J, Karlamangla A J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2019; 105(4).

PMID: 31840764 PMC: 7067542. DOI: 10.1210/clinem/dgz281.

References
1.
Szulc P, Seeman E, Duboeuf F, Sornay-Rendu E, Delmas P . Bone fragility: failure of periosteal apposition to compensate for increased endocortical resorption in postmenopausal women. J Bone Miner Res. 2006; 21(12):1856-63. DOI: 10.1359/jbmr.060904. View

2.
Riggs B, Melton Iii 3rd L, Robb R, Camp J, Atkinson E, Peterson J . Population-based study of age and sex differences in bone volumetric density, size, geometry, and structure at different skeletal sites. J Bone Miner Res. 2004; 19(12):1945-54. DOI: 10.1359/JBMR.040916. View

3.
Balena R, SHIH M, Parfitt A . Bone resorption and formation on the periosteal envelope of the ilium: a histomorphometric study in healthy women. J Bone Miner Res. 1992; 7(12):1475-82. DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.5650071216. View

4.
Ahlborg H, Johnell O, Turner C, Rannevik G, Karlsson M . Bone loss and bone size after menopause. N Engl J Med. 2003; 349(4):327-34. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa022464. View

5.
Leslie W, Lix L, Majumdar S, Morin S, Johansson H, Oden A . Total Hip Bone Area Affects Fracture Prediction With FRAX® in Canadian White Women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2017; 102(11):4242-4249. DOI: 10.1210/jc.2017-01327. View