» Articles » PMID: 31473609

Predicting the Risk of Stroke Among Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of C-statistics

Overview
Journal BMJ Open
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2019 Sep 2
PMID 31473609
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: Stroke is a major cause of disability and death worldwide. People with diabetes are at a twofold to fivefold increased risk for stroke compared with people without diabetes. This study systematically reviews the literature on available stroke prediction models specifically developed or validated in patients with diabetes and assesses their predictive performance through meta-analysis.

Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Data Sources: A detailed search was performed in MEDLINE, PubMed and EMBASE (from inception to 22 April 2019) to identify studies describing stroke prediction models.

Eligibility Criteria: All studies that developed stroke prediction models in populations with diabetes were included.

Data Extraction And Synthesis: Two reviewers independently identified eligible articles and extracted data. Random effects meta-analysis was used to obtain a pooled C-statistic.

Results: Our search retrieved 26 202 relevant papers and finally yielded 38 stroke prediction models, of which 34 were specifically developed for patients with diabetes and 4 were developed in general populations but validated in patients with diabetes. Among the models developed in those with diabetes, 9 reported their outcome as stroke, 23 reported their outcome as composite cardiovascular disease (CVD) where stroke was a component of the outcome and 2 did not report stroke initially as their outcome but later were validated for stroke as the outcome in other studies. C-statistics varied from 0.60 to 0.92 with a median C-statistic of 0.71 (for stroke as the outcome) and 0.70 (for stroke as part of a composite CVD outcome). Seventeen models were externally validated in diabetes populations with a pooled C-statistic of 0.68.

Conclusions: Overall, the performance of these diabetes-specific stroke prediction models was not satisfactory. Research is needed to identify and incorporate new risk factors into the model to improve models' predictive ability and further external validation of the existing models in diverse population to improve generalisability.

Citing Articles

CVD incidence and mortality among people with diabetes and/or hypertension: Results from the English longitudinal study of ageing.

Zaninotto P, Steptoe A, Shim E PLoS One. 2024; 19(5):e0303306.

PMID: 38820248 PMC: 11142434. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303306.


DNA methylation age acceleration is associated with risk of diabetes complications.

Vetter V, Spieker J, Sommerer Y, Buchmann N, Kalies C, Regitz-Zagrosek V Commun Med (Lond). 2023; 3(1):21.

PMID: 36765171 PMC: 9918553. DOI: 10.1038/s43856-023-00250-8.


Development and validation of a hypertension risk prediction model and construction of a risk score in a Canadian population.

Chowdhury M, Leung A, Sikdar K, OBeirne M, Quan H, Turin T Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1):12780.

PMID: 35896590 PMC: 9329335. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-16904-x.


Precision prognostics for the development of complications in diabetes.

Schiborn C, Schulze M Diabetologia. 2022; 65(11):1867-1882.

PMID: 35727346 PMC: 9522742. DOI: 10.1007/s00125-022-05731-4.


Prediction of hypertension using traditional regression and machine learning models: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Chowdhury M, Naeem I, Quan H, Leung A, Sikdar K, OBeirne M PLoS One. 2022; 17(4):e0266334.

PMID: 35390039 PMC: 8989291. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0266334.


References
1.
ODonnell M, Xavier D, Liu L, Zhang H, Chin S, Rao-Melacini P . Risk factors for ischaemic and intracerebral haemorrhagic stroke in 22 countries (the INTERSTROKE study): a case-control study. Lancet. 2010; 376(9735):112-23. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60834-3. View

2.
Lehto S, Ronnemaa T, Pyorala K, Laakso M . Predictors of stroke in middle-aged patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes. Stroke. 1996; 27(1):63-8. DOI: 10.1161/01.str.27.1.63. View

3.
Moons K, de Groot J, Bouwmeester W, Vergouwe Y, Mallett S, Altman D . Critical appraisal and data extraction for systematic reviews of prediction modelling studies: the CHARMS checklist. PLoS Med. 2014; 11(10):e1001744. PMC: 4196729. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001744. View

4.
Chowdhury M, Yeasmin F, Rabi D, Ronksley P, Turin T . Prognostic tools for cardiovascular disease in patients with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis of C-statistics. J Diabetes Complications. 2018; 33(1):98-111. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2018.10.010. View

5.
Tao L, Wilson E, Griffin S, Simmons R . Performance of the UKPDS outcomes model for prediction of myocardial infarction and stroke in the ADDITION-Europe trial cohort. Value Health. 2013; 16(6):1074-80. DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2013.06.001. View