» Articles » PMID: 31471729

Effectiveness of Shared Decision-making for Diabetes Prevention: 12-Month Results from the Prediabetes Informed Decision and Education (PRIDE) Trial

Overview
Publisher Springer
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2019 Sep 1
PMID 31471729
Citations 24
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Importance: Intensive lifestyle change (e.g., the Diabetes Prevention Program) and metformin reduce type 2 diabetes risk among patients with prediabetes. However, real-world uptake remains low. Shared decision-making (SDM) may increase awareness and help patients select and follow through with informed options for diabetes prevention that are aligned with their preferences.

Objective: To test the effectiveness of a prediabetes SDM intervention.

Design: Cluster randomized controlled trial.

Setting: Twenty primary care clinics within a large regional health system.

Participants: Overweight/obese adults with prediabetes (BMI ≥ 24 kg/m and HbA1c 5.7-6.4%) were enrolled from 10 SDM intervention clinics. Propensity score matching was used to identify control patients from 10 usual care clinics.

Intervention: Intervention clinic patients were invited to participate in a face-to-face SDM visit with a pharmacist who used a decision aid (DA) to describe prediabetes and four possible options for diabetes prevention: DPP, DPP ± metformin, metformin only, or usual care.

Main Outcomes And Measures: Primary endpoint was uptake of DPP (≥ 9 sessions), metformin, or both strategies at 4 months. Secondary endpoint was weight change (lbs.) at 12 months.

Results: Uptake of DPP and/or metformin was higher among SDM participants (n = 351) than controls receiving usual care (n = 1028; 38% vs. 2%, p < .001). At 12-month follow-up, adjusted weight loss (lbs.) was greater among SDM participants than controls (- 5.3 vs. - 0.2, p < .001).

Limitations: Absence of DPP supplier participation data for matched patients in usual care clinics.

Conclusions And Relevance: A prediabetes SDM intervention led by pharmacists increased patient engagement in evidence-based options for diabetes prevention and was associated with significantly greater uptake of DPP and/or metformin at 4 months and weight loss at 12 months. Prediabetes SDM may be a promising approach to enhance prevention efforts among patients at increased risk.

Trial Registration: This study was registered at clinicaltrails.gov (NCT02384109)).

Citing Articles

Cost-effectiveness of prevention program for type 2 diabetes mellitus in high risk patients in the Republic of Srpska, Bosnia and Herzegovina.

Grujic-Vujmilovic D, Veljkovic K, Gavric Z, Popovic-Pejicic S Libyan J Med. 2024; 20(1):2437226.

PMID: 39676503 PMC: 11650698. DOI: 10.1080/19932820.2024.2437226.


Patient and Provider Prediabetes Knowledge, Attitudes, and Behaviors in a Large Urban Family Medicine Practice.

Li E, Waters A, Cunningham A, Silverio A, Han J, Mills G Am J Lifestyle Med. 2024; 18(6):727-736.

PMID: 39507910 PMC: 11536499. DOI: 10.1177/15598276221123527.


Perceived Penalties for Sharing Patient Beliefs with Health Care Providers.

Marsh J, Asan O, Kleinberg S Med Decis Making. 2024; 44(6):617-626.

PMID: 39092564 PMC: 11346123. DOI: 10.1177/0272989X241262241.


Effectiveness of shared decision-making for glycaemic control among type 2 diabetes mellitus adult patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Geta E, Terefa D, Hailu W, Olani W, Merdassa E, Dessalegn M PLoS One. 2024; 19(7):e0306296.

PMID: 39083503 PMC: 11290692. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0306296.


Using the Translating Research into Practice framework to develop a diabetes prevention intervention in primary care: a mixed-methods study.

Tseng E, Smith K, Clark J, Segal J, Marsteller J, Maruthur N BMJ Open Qual. 2024; 13(2).

PMID: 38839396 PMC: 11163602. DOI: 10.1136/bmjoq-2024-002752.


References
1.
Allen J, Akinyemi I, Reich A, Fleary S, Tendulkar S, Lamour N . African American Women's Involvement in Promoting Informed Decision-Making for Prostate Cancer Screening Among Their Partners/Spouses. Am J Mens Health. 2018; 12(4):884-893. PMC: 6131450. DOI: 10.1177/1557988317742257. View

2.
Nelson K, Pitaro M, Tzellas A, Lum A . Practice profile. Transforming the role of medical assistants in chronic disease management. Health Aff (Millwood). 2010; 29(5):963-5. DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0129. View

3.
Weeks G, George J, MacLure K, Stewart D . Non-medical prescribing versus medical prescribing for acute and chronic disease management in primary and secondary care. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016; 11:CD011227. PMC: 6464275. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD011227.pub2. View

4.
Stacey D, Bennett C, Barry M, Col N, Eden K, Holmes-Rovner M . Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011; (10):CD001431. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub3. View

5.
Wu S, Crespi C, Wong W . Comparison of methods for estimating the intraclass correlation coefficient for binary responses in cancer prevention cluster randomized trials. Contemp Clin Trials. 2012; 33(5):869-80. PMC: 3426610. DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2012.05.004. View