» Articles » PMID: 31471405

First Reported Use of the Faxitron LOCalizer™ Radiofrequency Identification (RFID) System in Europe - A Feasibility Trial, Surgical Guide and Review for Non-palpable Breast Lesions

Overview
Journal In Vivo
Specialty Oncology
Date 2019 Sep 1
PMID 31471405
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background/aim: The problem of adequately marking any given lesion within a breast surgical site is commonly solved by introducing a titanium clip. However, clip dislocation and/or stereotactic hook-wire dislocation are common problems. An ideal solution would be a clip that can be easily found without the use of stereotactic intervention. This work reviews the available data on radiofrequency identification devices (RFID) in breast surgery, reports initial experience data in Europe and discusses surgical pitfalls, advantages and disadvantages.

Patients And Methods: This study represents a single center, consecutively recruited, initiation trial with subsequent surgeon questionnaire for the first institution in Europe to report Faxitron LOCalizer™ chip data. Four patients with non-palpable tumors were marked with the system and were correlated via mammography, pre- and intra-operative ultrasound and pathology. Data were then compared to available literature and a literature review was added.

Results: The four patients marked with this RFID system, displayed a 100% success location rate at a 0% complication rate. Surgeons evaluated the new system as being safe to use and only slightly more difficult to place compared to a standard clip. A significant improvement in ultrasound localization and intraoperative localization was also reported for the LOCalizer™ system when compared to a standard titanium clip.

Conclusion: This trial added a small number of consecutively recruited patients to an existing number of available data, resulting in a total of 121 evaluated and reviewed Faxitron LOCalizer™ marked non-palpable in-breast lesions worldwide.

Citing Articles

Patient satisfaction with radio-frequency identification (RFID) tag localization compared with wire localization for nonpalpable breast lesions: the RFID trial.

Pete R, Pinard C, Sirodot F, Molnar I, Dressaire M, Ginzac A BMC Cancer. 2025; 25(1):123.

PMID: 39844175 PMC: 11753160. DOI: 10.1186/s12885-025-13453-0.


Evolution of localization methods for non-palpable breast lesions: a literature review from a translational medicine perspective.

Cheung B, Co M, Lui T, Kwong A Transl Breast Cancer Res. 2024; 5:12.

PMID: 38751684 PMC: 11093046. DOI: 10.21037/tbcr-23-49.


A Radiological Clip Design Using Ultrasound Identification to Improve Localization.

Cario J, Kou Z, Miller R, Dickenson A, Lee C, Oelze M IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2024; 71(9):2699-2707.

PMID: 38607722 PMC: 11384548. DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2024.3388203.


Image-guided Localization Techniques for Nonpalpable Breast Lesions: An Opportunity for Multidisciplinary Patient-centered Care.

Davis K, Raybon C, Monga N, Waheed U, Michaels A, Henry C J Breast Imaging. 2024; 3(5):542-555.

PMID: 38424951 PMC: 11256989. DOI: 10.1093/jbi/wbab061.


Radiofrequency localization of nonpalpable breast cancer in a multicentre prospective cohort study: feasibility, clinical acceptability, and safety.

Christenhusz A, den Dekker B, van Dalen T, Jongen L, van der Schaaf M, Alic L Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2023; 201(1):67-75.

PMID: 37322358 PMC: 10300157. DOI: 10.1007/s10549-023-07006-x.


References
1.
Ersoy Y, Kadioglu H . Review of Novel Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Techniques in Breast Cancer Patients Treated With Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy. Clin Breast Cancer. 2018; 18(4):e555-e559. DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2018.01.004. View

2.
Dauphine C, Reicher J, Reicher M, Gondusky C, Khalkhali I, Kim M . A prospective clinical study to evaluate the safety and performance of wireless localization of nonpalpable breast lesions using radiofrequency identification technology. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015; 204(6):W720-3. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.14.13201. View

3.
Santiago L, Candelaria R, Huang M . MR Imaging-Guided Breast Interventions: Indications, Key Principles, and Imaging-Pathology Correlation. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2018; 26(2):235-246. DOI: 10.1016/j.mric.2017.12.002. View

4.
DiNome M, Kusske A, Attai D, Fischer C, Hoyt A . Microchipping the breast: an effective new technology for localizing non-palpable breast lesions for surgery. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2019; 175(1):165-170. DOI: 10.1007/s10549-019-05143-w. View

5.
Sikosek N, Dovnik A, Arko D, Takac I . The role of intraoperative ultrasound in breast-conserving surgery of nonpalpable breast cancer. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2014; 126(3-4):90-4. DOI: 10.1007/s00508-013-0470-8. View