» Articles » PMID: 31466315

Electromagnetic Energy Absorption in a Head Approaching a Radiofrequency Identification (RFID) Reader Operating at 13.56 MHz in Users of Hearing Implants Versus Non-Users

Overview
Journal Sensors (Basel)
Publisher MDPI
Specialty Biotechnology
Date 2019 Aug 31
PMID 31466315
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The aim of this study was to model the absorption in the head of an electromagnetic field (EMF) emitted by a radiofrequency identification reader operating at a frequency of 13.56 MHz (recognized as an RFID HF reader), with respect to the direct biophysical effects evaluated by the specific absorption rate (SAR), averaged over the entire head or locally, over any 10 g of tissues. The exposure effects were compared between the head of a user of a hearing implant with an acoustic sensor and a person without such an implant, used as a referenced case. The RFID HF reader, such as is used in shops or libraries, was modeled as a loop antenna (35 × 35 cm). SAR was calculated in a multi-layer ellipsoidal model of the head-with or without models of hearing implants of two types: Bonebridge (MED-EL, Austria) or bone anchored hearing aid attract (BAHA) (Cochlear, Sweden). Relative SAR values were calculated as the ratio between the SAR in the head of the implant user and the non-user. It was found that the use of BAHA hearing implants increased the effects of 13.56 MHz EMF exposure in the head in comparison to non-user-up to 2.1 times higher localized SAR in the worst case exposure scenario, and it is statistically significant higher than when Bonebridge implants are used (Kruscal-Wallis test with Bonferroni correction, p < 0.017). The evaluation of EMF exposure from an RFID reader with respect to limits established for the implant non-user population may be insufficient to protect an implant user when exposure approaches these limits, but the significant difference between exposure effects in users of various types of implants need to be considered.

Citing Articles

Modelling and Evaluating Electromagnetic Field Exposure in the Multiple-Source Scenario of Using IoT HF RFID Readers.

Zradzinski P Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(6).

PMID: 35328961 PMC: 8955348. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19063274.


Occupational exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields.

Stam R Ind Health. 2021; 60(3):201-215.

PMID: 34789598 PMC: 9171125. DOI: 10.2486/indhealth.2021-0129.


Systemic Overview of Microstrip Patch Antenna's for Different Biomedical Applications.

Arora G, Maman P, Sharma A, Verma N, Puri V Adv Pharm Bull. 2021; 11(3):439-449.

PMID: 34513618 PMC: 8421620. DOI: 10.34172/apb.2021.051.


Modelling and Evaluation of the Absorption of the 866 MHz Electromagnetic Field in Humans Exposed near to Fixed I-RFID Readers Used in Medical RTLS or to Monitor PPE.

Zradzinski P, Karpowicz J, Gryz K, Owczarek G, Ramos V Sensors (Basel). 2021; 21(12).

PMID: 34205808 PMC: 8233764. DOI: 10.3390/s21124251.


An Evaluation of Electromagnetic Exposure While Using Ultra-High Frequency Radiofrequency Identification (UHF RFID) Guns.

Zradzinski P, Karpowicz J, Gryz K, Ramos V Sensors (Basel). 2020; 20(1).

PMID: 31905869 PMC: 6982864. DOI: 10.3390/s20010202.

References
1.
Kumar R, Lerski R, Gandy S, Clift B, Abboud R . Safety of orthopedic implants in magnetic resonance imaging: an experimental verification. J Orthop Res. 2006; 24(9):1799-802. DOI: 10.1002/jor.20213. View

2.
Virtanen H, Keshvari J, Lappalainen R . The effect of authentic metallic implants on the SAR distribution of the head exposed to 900, 1800 and 2450 MHz dipole near field. Phys Med Biol. 2007; 52(5):1221-36. DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/52/5/001. View

3.
Fiocchi S, Markakis I, Ravazzani P, Samaras T . SAR exposure from UHF RFID reader in adult, child, pregnant woman, and fetus anatomical models. Bioelectromagnetics. 2013; 34(6):443-52. DOI: 10.1002/bem.21789. View

4.
De Santis V, Douglas M, Nadakuduti J, Benkler S, Chen X, Kuster N . Human exposure from pulsed magnetic field therapy mats: a numerical case study with three commercial products. Bioelectromagnetics. 2015; 36(2):149-61. DOI: 10.1002/bem.21894. View

5.
Zradzinski P, Karpowicz J, Gryz K, Leszko W . [Evaluation of hazards caused by magnetic field emitted from magnetotherapy applicator to the users of bone conduction hearing prostheses]. Med Pr. 2017; 68(4):469-477. DOI: 10.13075/mp.5893.00399. View