Understanding the Effects of PBF Process Parameter Interplay on Ti-6Al-4V Surface Properties
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Ti-6Al-4V is commonly used in orthopaedic implants, and fabrication techniques such as Powder Bed Fusion (PBF) are becoming increasingly popular for the net-shape production of such implants, as PBF allows for complex customisation and minimal material wastage. Present research into PBF fabricated Ti-6Al-4V focuses on new design strategies (e.g. designing pores, struts or lattices) or mechanical property optimisation through process parameter control-however, it is pertinent to examine the effects of altering PBF process parameters on properties relating to bioactivity. Herein, changes in Ti-6Al-4V microstructure, mechanical properties and surface characteristics were examined as a result of varying PBF process parameters, with a view to understanding how to tune Ti-6Al-4V bio-activity during the fabrication stage itself. The interplay between various PBF laser scan speeds and laser powers influenced Ti-6Al-4V hardness, porosity, roughness and corrosion resistance, in a manner not clearly described by the commonly used volumetric energy density (VED) design variable. Key findings indicate that the relationships between PBF process parameters and ultimate Ti-6Al-4V properties are not straightforward as expected, and that wide ranges of porosity (0.03 ± 0.01% to 32.59 ± 2.72%) and corrosion resistance can be achieved through relatively minor changes in process parameters used-indicating volumetric energy density is a poor predictor of PBF Ti-6Al-4V properties. While variations in electrochemical behaviour with respect to the process parameters used in the PBF fabrication of Ti-6Al-4V have previously been reported, this study presents data regarding important surface characteristics over a large process window, reflecting the full capabilities of current PBF machinery.
Adak D, Sreeramagiri P, Roy S, Balasubramanian G Materials (Basel). 2023; 16(16).
PMID: 37629971 PMC: 10456614. DOI: 10.3390/ma16165680.
Shange M, Yadroitsava I, du Plessis A, Yadroitsev I 3D Print Addit Manuf. 2023; 9(4):288-300.
PMID: 36660231 PMC: 9831547. DOI: 10.1089/3dp.2020.0097.
Gaur B, Ghyar R, Bhallamudi R Indian J Orthop. 2022; 56(5):797-804.
PMID: 35547343 PMC: 9043156. DOI: 10.1007/s43465-021-00577-1.
Young Z, Coday M, Guo Q, Qu M, Hojjatzadeh S, Escano L Materials (Basel). 2022; 15(2).
PMID: 35057247 PMC: 8779089. DOI: 10.3390/ma15020530.