» Articles » PMID: 31464649

Validation of the Italian Version of the Abbreviated Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC-26) in Men with Prostate Cancer

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Public Health
Date 2019 Aug 30
PMID 31464649
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: This study aims to validate and evaluate the psychometric properties and reliability of the Italian version of the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite - Short Form (EPIC-26), a measure of quality of life (QoL) for prostate cancer patients.

Methods: Two hundred and eighty-four prostate cancer patients completed the Italian version of the EPIC-26 questionnaire at 45 days (T1) and 3 months (T2) after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). Psychometric properties were evaluated using structural equation modeling: the goodness of fit of the correlated five-factor model (CFFM) for the EPIC-26 was assessed using the confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), while longitudinal invariance was conducted to assess the ability of the EPIC-26 to measure QoL construct over time. Test-retest reliability was assessed as well by considering intraclass correlations.

Results: At T1, the CFFM model displayed a good fit to data. Similarly, the model showed an adequate fit also at T2. Results of the reliability analysis attested the acceptable internal consistency and test-retest reliability of each dimension: all Cronbach's alphas could be classified as acceptable (i.e., above .65) except for low Cronbach's alpha for hormonal dysfunction at T1 (i.e., .638) and urinary irritation at both waves. (i.e., respectively .585 and .518). Finally, psychometric properties were invariant over time and each of the five dimensions of QoL displayed from moderate (all ICCs above .500) to good test-retest reliability (i.e. ICC for urinary incontinence = .764).

Conclusions: Results of the CFA and the measurement invariance analysis demonstrated the validity of the Italian version of the EPIC-26 to assess QoL in prostate cancer patients. Its reliability and good psychometric qualities are well-supported, thus providing a valid tool to assess health-related quality of life and its change over time in prostate cancer patients.

Citing Articles

Development and validation of a questionnaire to measure the congenital heart disease of children's family stressor.

Zhang Y, Zhou H, Bai Y, Chen Z, Wang Y, Hu Q Front Public Health. 2024; 12:1365089.

PMID: 38751578 PMC: 11094312. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1365089.


Psychometric validation of the Spanish version of the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite-26.

Zamora V, Garin O, Suarez J, Jove J, Castells M, Ferrer F World J Urol. 2023; 41(12):3511-3518.

PMID: 37947846 PMC: 10693511. DOI: 10.1007/s00345-023-04691-7.


Urologic latency time during uroflow stop test with electromyography: an incontinence detector in rehabilitation after robotic radical prostatectomy.

Boni A, Gervasoni F, LoMauro A, Del Zingaro M, Maiolino G, Galletti C Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2022; 59(1):94-102.

PMID: 36305651 PMC: 10035442. DOI: 10.23736/S1973-9087.22.07365-8.


Creation and validation of the harmonized Arabic version of the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite for Clinical Practice (EPIC-CP).

Awad M, Hallgarth L, Barayan G, Shahait M, Abu-Hijlih R, Farkouh A Arab J Urol. 2022; 20(2):88-93.

PMID: 35530568 PMC: 9067989. DOI: 10.1080/2090598X.2021.2002636.


A novel mHealth App (RyPros) for prostate cancer management: an accessibility and acceptability study.

Wang G, Wu B, Chen J, Yu G, Lin D, Wang G Transl Androl Urol. 2021; 10(10):3723-3736.

PMID: 34804816 PMC: 8575583. DOI: 10.21037/tau-21-459.


References
1.
Wei J, Dunn R, Litwin M, Sandler H, Sanda M . Development and validation of the expanded prostate cancer index composite (EPIC) for comprehensive assessment of health-related quality of life in men with prostate cancer. Urology. 2000; 56(6):899-905. DOI: 10.1016/s0090-4295(00)00858-x. View

2.
Beaton D, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz M . Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000; 25(24):3186-91. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014. View

3.
Miller D, Sanda M, Dunn R, Montie J, Pimentel H, Sandler H . Long-term outcomes among localized prostate cancer survivors: health-related quality-of-life changes after radical prostatectomy, external radiation, and brachytherapy. J Clin Oncol. 2005; 23(12):2772-80. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.07.116. View

4.
Takegami M, Suzukamo Y, Sanda M, Kamoto T, Namiki S, Arai Y . [The Japanese translation and cultural adaptation of Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC)]. Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi. 2005; 96(7):657-69. DOI: 10.5980/jpnjurol1989.96.657. View

5.
Hsiao C, Loescher L, Moore I . Symptoms and symptom distress in localized prostate cancer. Cancer Nurs. 2007; 30(6):E19-32. DOI: 10.1097/01.NCC.0000300163.13639.bc. View