» Articles » PMID: 31464548

Early Feasibility Study to Evaluate the Viveve System for Female Stress Urinary Incontinence: Interim 6-Month Report

Overview
Date 2019 Aug 30
PMID 31464548
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The purpose of this prospective, investigator-initiated feasibility study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of nonablative, cryogen-cooled, monopolar radiofrequency (CMRF) treatment for stress urinary incontinence (SUI). Subjects meeting all the inclusion and exclusion criteria were enrolled and divided into two groups. Subjects in Group 1 received a single SUI treatment, and subjects in Group 2 received two SUI treatments ∼6 weeks apart. Follow-up visits are planned for 1, 4, 6, and 12 months post-treatment. At each study visit, subjects are asked to perform a 1-hour pad-weight test (PWT) and to complete the Urogenital Distress Inventory-6 (UDI-6), Incontinence Impact Questionnaire-Short Form (IIQ-7), and International Consultation on Incontinence Modular Questionnaire-Urinary Incontinence-Short Form (ICIQ-UI-SF) questionnaires. In addition, subjects completed 7-day bladder voiding diary and safety assessments. Preliminary data indicate an improvement in SUI symptoms and quality of life for subjects, as determined by validated SUI-related patient-reported outcomes and the objective 1-hour PWT, with a >50% reduction in pad weight for 68.8% of the Group 1 subjects and 69.2% of the Group 2 subjects at 6 months. Initial review of the bladder voiding diaries suggests that subjects are having fewer urine leakage episodes per day. In addition to efficacy, the CMRF Viveve System was well tolerated and safe. The endpoints evaluated indicate an improvement in SUI symptoms and quality of life. The sustained benefit of the CMRF vaginal treatment at 6 months suggests potential use as a nonsurgical approach to treat SUI.

Citing Articles

Effect of monopolar capacitive resistive radiofrequency in treating stress urinary incontinence: A pilot randomized control trial.

Elhosary E, Hamada H, Ali AlMubali F, Lopez Sanchez G, Ahmed S Front Psychol. 2023; 13:1062363.

PMID: 36687887 PMC: 9851078. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1062363.


A 12-month feasibility study to investigate the effectiveness of cryogen-cooled monopolar radiofrequency treatment for female stress urinary incontinence.

Allan B, Bell S, Husarek K Can Urol Assoc J. 2020; 14(7):E313-E318.

PMID: 32017688 PMC: 7337709. DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.6145.

References
1.
Uebersax J, Wyman J, Shumaker S, McClish D, Fantl J . Short forms to assess life quality and symptom distress for urinary incontinence in women: the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire and the Urogenital Distress Inventory. Continence Program for Women Research Group. Neurourol Urodyn. 1995; 14(2):131-9. DOI: 10.1002/nau.1930140206. View

2.
Guralnick M, Kelly H, Engelke H, Koduri S, OConnor R . InTone: a novel pelvic floor rehabilitation device for urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J. 2014; 26(1):99-106. DOI: 10.1007/s00192-014-2476-9. View

3.
Berjano E, Navarro E, Ribera V, Gorris J, Alio J . Radiofrequency heating of the cornea: an engineering review of electrodes and applicators. Open Biomed Eng J. 2009; 1:71-6. PMC: 2701077. DOI: 10.2174/1874120700701010071. View

4.
Tahtinen R, Cartwright R, Tsui J, Aaltonen R, Aoki Y, Cardenas J . Long-term Impact of Mode of Delivery on Stress Urinary Incontinence and Urgency Urinary Incontinence: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Eur Urol. 2016; 70(1):148-158. PMC: 5009182. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.01.037. View

5.
Salonia A, Zanni G, Nappi R, Briganti A, Deho F, Fabbri F . Sexual dysfunction is common in women with lower urinary tract symptoms and urinary incontinence: results of a cross-sectional study. Eur Urol. 2004; 45(5):642-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2003.11.023. View