» Articles » PMID: 31464516

High Prevalence of Skin Reactions Among Pediatric Patients with Type 1 Diabetes Using New Technologies: The Alarming Role of Colophonium

Overview
Date 2019 Aug 30
PMID 31464516
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In the past few years, the increasing use of devices for diabetes treatment, such as continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion pumps, flash glucose monitoring, continuous glucose monitoring systems, sensor-augmented pumps, and automated insulin delivery devices, has resulted in important improvements in disease management. Meanwhile, the longer a patient uses a device, the greater the likelihood of developing a skin reaction. Allergic contact dermatitis is the most frequently described skin side effect caused by adhesive tapes contained in the insulin infusion sets or glucose sensor sets and used to connect these devices to the body. We describe 18 patients, followed up at our Pediatric Diabetes Centre, who experienced dermatological complications due to diabetes device use from January 2018 to December 2018. All the patients were patch tested with allergens from a "standard" series and from a "plastics and glues" series. Patch tests resulted positive in 66.7% of patients. Colophonium was the most frequently isolated sensitizing allergen (41.1% of cases). It is a complex mixture of 100 compounds derived from pine trees. Colophonium is commonly used, in both unmodified and modified forms, as a fast-acting adhesive for industrial, medical, or other commercial uses. Its presence in the adhesive of the insulin sets and glucose sensors was confirmed by the manufacturer of some devices brand. On the basis of our results, we stress the importance of contacting manufacturers for product information. We also highlight that there should be stricter legal restrictions to label medical adhesives, even if only small amounts of colophonium are used.

Citing Articles

Allergic contact dermatitis caused by glucose sensors and insulin pumps: A full review: Part 2. Case reports and case series, clinical features, patch test procedures, differentiation from irritant dermatitis, management of allergic patients and....

de Groot A, van Oers E, Ipenburg N, Rustemeyer T Contact Dermatitis. 2024; 92(3):164-175.

PMID: 39600134 PMC: 11795346. DOI: 10.1111/cod.14697.


Insulin Pump Therapy and Adverse Skin Reactions With Focus on Allergic Contact Dermatitis in Individuals Living With Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Clinical-Based Update.

von Kobyletzki L, Ulriksdotter J, von Kobyletzki E, Mowitz M, Jendle J, Svedman C J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2024; 18(6):1300-1312.

PMID: 38853748 PMC: 11535278. DOI: 10.1177/19322968241252613.


Device-Related Skin Reactions Increase Emotional Burden in Youths With Type 1 Diabetes and Their Parents.

Passanisi S, Galletta F, Bombaci B, Cherubini V, Tiberi V, Minuto N J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2024; 18(6):1293-1299.

PMID: 38804535 PMC: 11535255. DOI: 10.1177/19322968241253285.


Perceptions of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Systems in the T1D Exchange Diabetes Registry: Satisfaction, Concerns, and Areas for Future Improvement.

Holt E, Nguyen H, Bispham J, Liu J, Chapman K, Grady M Clin Diabetes. 2024; 42(1):104-115.

PMID: 38230340 PMC: 10788666. DOI: 10.2337/cd23-0005.


Diabetes Technology Meeting 2021.

Xu N, Nguyen K, DuBord A, Pickup J, Sherr J, Teymourian H J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2022; 16(4):1016-1056.

PMID: 35499170 PMC: 9264449. DOI: 10.1177/19322968221090279.