» Articles » PMID: 31456213

Having Your Cake and Eating It Too: Flexibility and Power with Mass Univariate Statistics for ERP Data

Overview
Specialty Psychiatry
Date 2019 Aug 29
PMID 31456213
Citations 34
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

ERP studies produce large spatiotemporal data sets. These rich data sets are key to enabling us to understand cognitive and neural processes. However, they also present a massive multiple comparisons problem, potentially leading to a large number of studies with false positive effects (a high Type I error rate). Standard approaches to ERP statistical analysis, which average over time windows and regions of interest, do not always control for Type I error, and their inflexibility can lead to low power to detect true effects. Mass univariate approaches offer an alternative analytic method. However, they have thus far been viewed as appropriate primarily for exploratory statistical analysis and only applicable to simple designs. Here, we present new simulation studies showing that permutation-based mass univariate tests can be employed with complex factorial designs. Most importantly, we show that mass univariate approaches provide slightly greater power than traditional spatiotemporal averaging approaches when strong a priori time windows and spatial regions are used. Moreover, their power decreases only modestly when more exploratory spatiotemporal parameters are used. We argue that mass univariate approaches are preferable to traditional spatiotemporal averaging analysis approaches for many ERP studies.

Citing Articles

The influence of signal strength on conscious and nonconscious neural processing of emotional faces.

Schlossmacher I, Herbig M, Dellert T, Straube T, Bruchmann M Neurosci Conscious. 2025; 2025(1):niaf001.

PMID: 39916700 PMC: 11799861. DOI: 10.1093/nc/niaf001.


Emotional Evaluations from Partners and Opponents Differentially Influence the Perception of Ambiguous Faces.

Ran D, Zhang Y, Hao B, Li S Behav Sci (Basel). 2025; 14(12.

PMID: 39767309 PMC: 11673254. DOI: 10.3390/bs14121168.


Webcams as Windows to the Mind? A Direct Comparison Between In-Lab and Web-Based Eye-Tracking Methods.

Slim M, Kandel M, Yacovone A, Snedeker J Open Mind (Camb). 2024; 8:1369-1424.

PMID: 39654819 PMC: 11627531. DOI: 10.1162/opmi_a_00171.


Using cluster-based permutation tests to estimate MEG/EEG onsets: How bad is it?.

Rousselet G Eur J Neurosci. 2024; 61(1):e16618.

PMID: 39617724 PMC: 11670281. DOI: 10.1111/ejn.16618.


Neurocognitive dynamics of preparatory and adaptive cognitive control: Insights from mass-univariate and multivariate pattern analysis of EEG data.

Garcia Alanis J, Guth M, Chavanon M, Peper M PLoS One. 2024; 19(10):e0311319.

PMID: 39432477 PMC: 11493265. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0311319.


References
1.
Judd C, Westfall J, Kenny D . Treating stimuli as a random factor in social psychology: a new and comprehensive solution to a pervasive but largely ignored problem. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2012; 103(1):54-69. DOI: 10.1037/a0028347. View

2.
Urbach T, Kutas M . Interpreting event-related brain potential (ERP) distributions: implications of baseline potentials and variability with application to amplitude normalization by vector scaling. Biol Psychol. 2006; 72(3):333-43. DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2005.11.012. View

3.
Servan-Schreiber D, Cohen J, Steingard S . Schizophrenic deficits in the processing of context. A test of a theoretical model. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1996; 53(12):1105-12. DOI: 10.1001/archpsyc.1996.01830120037008. View

4.
Bullmore E, Suckling J, Overmeyer S, Rabe-Hesketh S, Taylor E, Brammer M . Global, voxel, and cluster tests, by theory and permutation, for a difference between two groups of structural MR images of the brain. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1999; 18(1):32-42. DOI: 10.1109/42.750253. View

5.
Nickerson R . Null hypothesis significance testing: a review of an old and continuing controversy. Psychol Methods. 2000; 5(2):241-301. DOI: 10.1037/1082-989x.5.2.241. View