» Articles » PMID: 31455749

1q21 Gain Combined with High-Risk Factors Is a Heterogeneous Prognostic Factor in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma: A Multicenter Study in China

Overview
Journal Oncologist
Specialty Oncology
Date 2019 Aug 29
PMID 31455749
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The prognostic value of 1q21 gain in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) remains controversial. Our aim was to investigate the prognostic value of 1q21 gain in a Chinese population.

Materials And Methods: We retrospectively identified 565 patients with NDMM from multiple centers in China.

Results: We detected 1q21 gain in 222 (39.3%) patients, among whom 144 had three copies of 1q21, 57 had four copies of 1q21, and 21 had at least five copies of 1q21. Copy number variation did not show any effect on the disease outcome. Multivariate analysis indicated that 1q21 gain was an independent factor for poor prognosis, but we found that 1q21 gain was strongly associated with other high-risk factors, such as del(17p), t(4;14), t(14;16), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) level >300 U/L and International Scoring System (ISS) stage II-III ( < .001). Further analysis revealed that in the absence of other high-risk factors, isolated 1q21 gain resulted in similar progression-free survival (PFS; 52.0 vs. 52.8 months, = .810) and overall survival (OS; not reached vs. not reached, = .833); additionally, when present with other high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities or increased LDH levels, 1q21 gain lost its prognostic power. However, the presence of 1q21 gain increased the adverse impact of ISS stage. Furthermore, 1q21 gain predicted poor PFS and OS in patients who received bortezomib-based regimens. Moreover, autologous stem cell transplantation reversed the poor prognosis in patients with 1q21 gain.

Conclusion: Our results show that heterogeneity exists among patients with 1q21 gain and suggest that we should assess the impact of 1q21 gain on prognosis according to different treatment regimens and accompanying high-risk factors.

Implications For Practice: 1q21 gain is one of the most common chromosomal aberrations in multiple myeloma (MM); however, the prognostic value of 1q21 gain remains controversial. This study investigated the prognostic value of 1q21 gain in a Chinese population with newly diagnosed MM. The results showed that heterogeneity exists among patients with 1q21 gain and suggested that the impact of 1q21 gain on prognosis should be assessed according to different treatment regimens and accompanying high-risk factors. These results could help stratify risk in patients with MM and guide treatment decisions.

Citing Articles

The prognostic impact of 1q21 gain/amplification in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: a retrospective study based on a single center in China.

Li Y, Deng J, Chen W Ann Hematol. 2025; 104(1):503-513.

PMID: 39753831 DOI: 10.1007/s00277-024-06164-2.


The Genetic and Molecular Drivers of Multiple Myeloma: Current Insights, Clinical Implications, and the Path Forward.

Ram M, Fraser M, Vieira Dos Santos J, Tasakis R, Islam A, Abo-Donia J Pharmgenomics Pers Med. 2024; 17:573-609.

PMID: 39723112 PMC: 11669356. DOI: 10.2147/PGPM.S350238.


Impact of bortezomib on 1q21+ in multiple myeloma: A meta-analysis of treatment outcomes and prognostic implications.

Zheng X, Lin S, Lu K, Hou J, Liu T Oncol Lett. 2024; 29(1):18.

PMID: 39492930 PMC: 11526441. DOI: 10.3892/ol.2024.14764.


Chromosome 1q21 Aberrations Are Poor Prognostic Factors for Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Patients.

Wang T, Geng C, Yang G, Zhou H, Zhang Z, Jian Y J Clin Lab Anal. 2024; 38(17-18):e25072.

PMID: 39263925 PMC: 11484708. DOI: 10.1002/jcla.25072.


The numerous facets of 1q21 in multiple myeloma: Pathogenesis, clinicopathological features, prognosis and clinical progress (Review).

Liu N, Xie Z, Li H, Wang L Oncol Lett. 2024; 27(6):258.

PMID: 38646497 PMC: 11027100. DOI: 10.3892/ol.2024.14391.


References
1.
Lim A, Krishnan S, Lim T, See K, Ng Y, Tan Y . Amplification of 1q21 and other abnormalities in multiple myeloma patients from a tertiary hospital in singapore. Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus. 2014; 30(4):253-8. PMC: 4243399. DOI: 10.1007/s12288-013-0294-8. View

2.
Mikhael J, Dingli D, Roy V, Reeder C, Buadi F, Hayman S . Management of newly diagnosed symptomatic multiple myeloma: updated Mayo Stratification of Myeloma and Risk-Adapted Therapy (mSMART) consensus guidelines 2013. Mayo Clin Proc. 2013; 88(4):360-76. DOI: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2013.01.019. View

3.
Shah G, Landau H, Londono D, Devlin S, Kosuri S, Lesokhin A . Gain of chromosome 1q portends worse prognosis in multiple myeloma despite novel agent-based induction regimens and autologous transplantation. Leuk Lymphoma. 2017; 58(8):1823-1831. PMC: 5554510. DOI: 10.1080/10428194.2016.1260126. View

4.
An G, Xu Y, Shi L, Shizhen Z, Deng S, Xie Z . Chromosome 1q21 gains confer inferior outcomes in multiple myeloma treated with bortezomib but copy number variation and percentage of plasma cells involved have no additional prognostic value. Haematologica. 2013; 99(2):353-9. PMC: 3912967. DOI: 10.3324/haematol.2013.088211. View

5.
Greipp P, San Miguel J, Durie B, Crowley J, Barlogie B, Blade J . International staging system for multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol. 2005; 23(15):3412-20. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.04.242. View